April 17, 2008

The Bahamas Gets It, and Now Oklahoma is Getting It (Hiya, Sally Kern!)

Last October, I mentioned that The Bahamas was (were?) finally started to wake up to the reality that if you treat homos like garbage, homos won’t spend their vacation dollars in your island/country/town.

It ain’t rocket science.

Of course, not too many homo-haters in this country, the Grand Ol’ U.S. of A., are even close to rocket scientists. Sally Kern — about whom Buffy has written extensively on The Gaytheist Agenda — would be lucky to pass a course in the Science of Tying One’s Shoes.

Luckily, Oklahoma is not filled with Sally Kerns (although we do question the very humanity of the dipsticks stupid — or just hateful — enough to vote for her), and is beginning to understand that homophobic hatred could cost the Sooner State some serious money.

Not that we Sneaky Homosexual Agendaists were planning to descend en masse and rename the place Oklahomo; no, it’s this, via The Journal-Record:

OKC Chamber: Kern spooks big biz relocation consultant

OKLAHOMA CITY — A San Francisco Bay-area financial services company has not yet ruled out Oklahoma City for a major office relocation, a vice president of a real estate search firm confirmed. A decision is expected in three to four weeks.

But Tom Maloney, vice president of California-based Staubach Co., would neither confirm nor deny that the 1,000-employee, AAA-rated client company’s top executive is a lesbian who expressed concern over Oklahoma Rep. Sally Kern’s recent anti-homosexual statements, as has been the topic circulating among local business leaders.

Roy Williams, president of the Greater Oklahoma City Chamber, said the issue is a major concern the chamber is trying to address. He confirmed a Staubach consultant was troubled by Kern’s comments during a recent visit to the city.

“He told us straight up … ‘I cannot recommend to any of my clients that they should consider Oklahoma City because of that,’” Williams said. “When you have one of the nation’s premier relocation experts making those statements, you should pay attention to that and not dismiss it.

“And that’s immediately what happened: People said, ‘Well, then tell them not to come here.’ …”

At the Commerce Department, Business Services Deputy Director Sandy Pratt said … Kern’s comments have not been raised as a concern: “It did not come up in any of the governor’s economic development team meetings with consultants or discussions we’ve had with consultants,” Pratt said. …

As for Kern’s comments, “They no doubt send a message out there that no city wants to send, and that is one of divisiveness instead of unitedness,” [Williams] said. For the last five years, the chamber has made a greater effort “to embrace differences and embrace diversity, to build a community that is open and welcoming to anyone.”

Well, that’s a very nice sentiment, Mr. Williams, but while Oklahoma City may be “open and welcoming to anyone,” the state of Oklahoma is very much stuck in the Dark Ages, thanks to your constitutional ban on marriage equality.

Sally Kern aside — and seriously, who is Sally Kern but just another dunderheaded bigot who’s done us the favor of showing the public just how mean and stupid homophobes can be? Sally Kern is a flyspeck in the cosmos. It’s the people of Oklahoma — the ones who decided to legislate their own gay and lesbian neighbors into permanent second-class citizenship — who are the problem. It’s nearly impossible to comprehend that the marriage ban isn’t Staubach’s biggest concern: Staubach’s LGBT employees will have no rights in Oklahoma.

Interestingly, Indianapolis is also on Staubach’s list of potential new homes. Wake up, Staubach — Indiana is hardly better than Oklahoma; aside from the fact that Indiana refuses to recognize any same-sex marriage, civil union, or domestic partnership established in another state, and aside from the fact that a state constitutional ban on marriage equality failed in February, the issue is far from dead: Both houses of the state legislature favor a ban, and there’s an ongoing push to put the issue to the voters. And (especially when you consider that over the past seven years, only one state, Arizona, was able to beat back a marriage amendment) you know what that means; to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin (and mix in a little Ayn Rand), when you allow the majority to vote on the rights of a minority, you’ve got two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.

Staubach, you need to reconsider this move. I’m assuming you want to leave California because it would be cheaper to do business somewhere else.

But you’ve got to ask yourselves which is more important: money, or doing the right thing.

Meh, I know: It’s business. And money always trumps the right thing.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

|

 |   |  Category: Caribbean, Employment/ENDA, Hate Speech, Indiana, Marriage Equality, Oklahoma, United States






September 25, 2007

Like none of the other churches they insure take any “controversial positions”?

Company Refuses To Insure Church Over Denomination’s Support For Gay Marriage

(Adrian, Michigan) A company that specializes in church insurance has refused to provide coverage to a United Church of Christ congregation over the denomination’s support for same-sex marriage.

The UCC said that West Adrian United Church of Christ was told that its gay-affirming stances made it a “higher risk” for property and liability insurance.

“Our company’s decision to not submit a quote to your organization arose out of information that was supplied in a supplemental application, indicating that your organization ‘publicly endorses or practices the marriage of same-sex couples’ and ‘publicly endorses or practices the ordination of the homosexual clergy,’” Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company, based in Fort Wayne, Indiana said in a letter to the church.

“[Brotherhood Mutual has] an obligation to serve as stewards of our policyholder’s funds, and to avoid knowingly insuring organizations that are at higher risk of loss based on the controversial positions that they have taken,” the letter, signed by Marci J. Fretz, a regional underwriter for the company, said.

Founded in 1917, Brotherhood Mutual, bills itself as one of the nation’s leading insurers of churches and related ministries. It provides insurance to 30,000 congregations in 29 states and the District of Columbia.

Discuss this story

Posted by: Sapphocrat

|

 |   |  Category: Indiana, Marriage Equality, Michigan, Random Bigotry, UCC, United States






September 22, 2007

Nabbed in the Nick of Time

Lady of Justice, Flag and Columns

From the South Bend (Indiana) Tribune:

[In] a move that proves it’s never too late to seek justice, prosecutors on Wednesday filed murder charges against a 47-year-old Mishawaka man in the killing of [Gerald G. Gherardi], who was then 28.

Daniel Kevin Seltzer, who is serving a prison sentence for an unrelated 1983 murder, has been charged with strangling Gherardi to death on March 28, 1981, in the victim’s apartment.

. . .

Gerry Gherardi, then an organist and choir director at St. Patrick Catholic Church in South Bend, had failed to show up for services Saturday night and Sunday morning. It was unusual for him to be absent without calling.

. . .

While it’s unclear what, if any, new evidence may have allowed investigators to pursue charges against Seltzer, a probable cause affidavit filed on Wednesday in support of the charges makes mention of DNA analysis, first used in a criminal case after Gherardi’s killing, in 1988.

. . .

On Nov. 2, 1983, Seltzer was sentenced to 50 years in prison for [the murder of 34-year-old George Lamphere, also of Mishawaka].

. . .

According to Tribune archived stories, Lamphere, also an organist, had been beaten before he was choked. He was the musical director of two area churches. Like Gherardi, Lamphere allegedly was gay and was believed to have “picked up” Seltzer and taken him to his apartment.

Discuss this story

Posted by: Sapphocrat

|

 |   |  Category: Hate Crimes, Indiana






September 13, 2007

40-Year Sentence For Gay ‘Butchery’ Upheld

A unanimous Indiana Court of Appeals panel upheld a 40-year prison term for Shawntrell Norington, who pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter charges in the 2003 murder of Roderick Shreve, an HIV-positive gay man, after they had sex. The court also upheld additional prison time for Norington’s guilty pleas to other offenses, totaling 60 years.

According to Judge Cale J. Bradford’s opinion for the court, the two men met in September 2003, while Norington was already wanted on a robbery and weapons charge stemming from a liquor store hold-up. The two went to Shreve’s home in Indianapolis where they had sex. Afterward, Shreve “revealed to Norington that he was HIV positive.”

“Norington became enraged,” Bradford wrote. “He responded by beating and stabbing Shreve multiple times with such force that at some point he broke a knife off in Shreve’s body, grabbed another knife, and continued stabbing and slashing, ultimately causing Shreve’s death.” Norington later returned to Shreve’s house with a friend and stole two cars, a safe, Shreve’s wallet, and a telephone.

. . .

At sentencing in May 2004, in front of Marion Superior Court Judge Grant Hawkins, the prosecutor argued that Norington’s “butchery” of Shreve was an aggravating factor meriting a much longer sentence than normal for voluntary manslaughter, a “heat of passion” charge applied in a murder provoked by the victim’s conduct. The liquor store robbery also involved aggravating factors, as Norington pulled a gun on the clerk, and he had prior theft and weapons convictions. …

More from Gay City News

Discuss this story

Posted by: Sapphocrat

|

 |   |  Category: Hate Crimes, Indiana