August 4, 2009

Erik Prince, Murderer?

The blockbuster article from The Nation is too complex to excerpt coherently, so just read on — and then, after the jump, take a look at a very abbreviated map that explains just a few more reasons we detest everything Erik Prince (and, in fact, his entire, theocratic, un-American family) stands for.

Blackwater Founder Implicated in Murder
Jeremy Scahill, The Nation, August 4, 2009

Read more »»»

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: California, Christianity, Civil Rights, Crime, Iraq, Islam, Marriage, Proposition 8, Radical Religious Right, Republicans


July 31, 2009

Marriage Equality: Albania Latest Country Poised to Leave U.S. in the Dust

Albania? Albania?!

Albania ‘to approve gay marriage’

Albanian Prime Minister Sali Berisha has announced his party will propose a law legalising same-sex marriage.

It is an unexpected move in a country that is still one of the most conservative in Europe and where homosexuality was illegal until 1995.

Mr Berisha acknowledged the proposed law might provoke debate but maintained that discrimination in modern Albania had to end. …

In a predominantly Muslim country with almost no open homosexual community, the announcement by a conservative PM has taken people by surprise.

Goran Miletic, a Belgrade-based human rights lawyer, working partly on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) issues said it was an important step forward for the country. …

More at the link.

Albania?!?!

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Civil Rights, Europe, Islam, Marriage


July 3, 2009

Gay Sex Decriminalized in India After 150 Years

Not that India’s radical religionists aren’t going batpoo ballistic — they are, of course:

Read more »»»

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Civil Rights, Hinduism, India, Islam, Privacy, Radical Religious Right, Religion & Spirituality


June 22, 2009

Christian Chaplains Proselytizing Muslims: “Growing” Controversy?

“Growing” controversy? “Growing”? What, has no one been paying attention since we invaded Iraq? This has been a major “controversy” to me for, oh, I dunno, like six freaking years:

Now, this is one good Christian… Not!, April 6, 2003

Franklin Graham, Christian Crusader, April 21, 2003

One more excellent read on Franklin Graham…, April 21, 2003

Well, better late than never, I suppose, that the U.S. MSM is finally shedding some light on this (six years ago, I had to rely on independent bloggers and the British papers for most of my information) — no matter how annoyed I get that it takes so bloody long for the MSM to catch up with us crazy lefties who’ve been saying “I told you so” all along:

Read more »»»

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Afghanistan, Christianity, Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush, Iraq, Islam, Radical Religious Right, Republicans, September 11


June 20, 2009

R.I.P. Ali Akbar Khan (1922-2009)

I know he was Muslim, but he was also Bangladeshi — and when it comes right down to it, death— er, being absorbed into the absolute — is The Great Equalizer, so who cares in the end if I don’t know which language to use? All that matters is, he was brilliant, and his music inspirational beyond words.

So here’s a rough (very rough) translation to Sanskrit:

Sanskrit Rest In Peace

Read more »»»

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Asia, India, Islam, Music, R.I.P., Religion & Spirituality


May 29, 2009

Moqtada al-Sadr: “Eradicate Homosexuality”

AMY GOODMAN: Were you a supporter of Saddam Hussein?

ALI HILI: No, no, no, no. Actually, I’m personally, I have big hate for this person. He is the worst thing that ever happened to Iraq, maybe, until we saw these religious mullahs who were brought to the government to lead this country. We were much better off in the Saddam time, although he’s a tyrant.

Iraqi Exile Speaks Out Against the
Targeting of Gay Iraqis by Shia Death Squads

March 23, 2006

So, this is what we “liberated” Iraq for? Betcha Obama won’t have any more to say about this than Bush did — although I’d love to hear The Big O’s reasoning about the way we should respect all deeply-held religious beliefs:

Read more »»»

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Hate Crimes, Hate Speech, Homophobia, Iraq, Islam, Radical Religious Right


May 7, 2009

More Evidence the Anti-Gays Are Coming to Terms With Reality. Sort Of.

They’re not happy about it, of course, and there will always be that core stubbornly stuck in LaLaLand, but we’re seeing more of them come around, and admit they’re losing the war.

From Hot Air — the most aptly-named right-wing blog on the Intertubes, which surprised me to no end with this piece that is essentially rational (albeit shrouded in the ever-present veil of imagined persecution):

Read more »»»

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Celebrities, Christianity, Church-State Separation, Civil Rights, Free Speech, Homophobia, Islam, LGBT History, Marriage, Methodists, National Organization for Marriage/Maggie Gallagher, Polygamy & Polyamory, Radical Religious Right, Religion & Spirituality


May 2, 2009

Whose Idea of “Traditional Marriage” Again? (Again)

Marriage of Saudi Arabian girl, eight, annulled

An eight-year old Saudi Arabian girl who was married off by her father to a man in his 50s has had the union annulled, it was reported yesterday. …

The child, who has not been named, had been told by a court last December that she would not be allowed to divorce her husband until she reached puberty. …

The previous judge had ruled for the second time earlier this month that the marriage was legal. The father is said to have married the child to a friend to pay a financial debt. …

In many Saudi child marriages, girls are given away to older men in return for dowries, or following the custom by which a father promises his daughters and sons in marriage while still children. …

No figures are available for the number of arranged marriages involving pre-adolescents in the kingdom, where the strictly conservative Wahhabi version of Sunni Islam holds sway and polygamy is common. …

Related:

Whose Idea of “Traditional Marriage”?, February 28, 2009

Whose Idea of “Traditional Marriage” Again?, March 18, 2009

Whose Idea of “Traditional Marriage” Again? Marital Rape Now A-OK in Afghanistan, March 31, 2009

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Islam, Marriage, Saudi Arabia, Youth


March 31, 2009

Whose Idea of “Traditional Marriage” Again? Marital Rape Now A-OK in Afghanistan

Not that the brainless drones of the Martha Peace Stepford Cult and the tyrants of the Dennis Prager School of Wifely Subjugation would object to returning to the days of legal marital rape in the U.S. — they’d welcome it. But the point stands, regardless:

Hamid Karzai signs law
‘legalising rape in marriage’

President Hamid Karzai has signed a law the UN says legalises rape in marriage and prevents women from leaving the house without permission.

The law, which has not been publicly released, is believed to state women can only seek work, education or doctor’s appointments with their husband’s permission.

Only fathers and grandfathers are granted custody of children under the law, according to the United Nations Development Fund for Women.

Opponents of the legislation governing the personal lives of Afghanistan’s Shia minority have said it is “worse than during the Taliban”.

Mr Karzai has been accused of electioneering at the expense of women’s rights by signing the law to appeal to crucial Shia swing voters in this year’s presidential poll. …

Gee, kinda like a U.S. presidential candidate — or a sitting U.S. President — sucking up to our own homegrown Talibornagains for votes and other favors at the expense of women and gays, innit?

The bill passed both houses of the Afghan parliament, but was so contentious that the United Nations and women’s rights campaigners have so far been unable to see a copy of the approved bill. … “[T]hey didn’t want to discuss it because Karzai wants to please the Shia before the election.” …

A spokesman for President Hamid Karzai would not comment.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Afghanistan, Christianity, Civil Rights, Crime, Heterosexuality, Islam, Marriage, Radical Religious Right, Women


March 18, 2009

Whose Idea of “Traditional Marriage” Again?

Riddle me this, all you “defenders of traditional marriage”: Wouldn’t you say this is a violation of this man’s “religious freedom”?

Cleric Arrested Over Marriage to 12-Year-Old

A Muslim cleric who took a 12-year-old girl as his second wife has been arrested for gross indecency with a minor, Semarang [Indonesia] Police said on Tuesday.

“We have collected enough evidence to charge him with underage obscenity under the Criminal Code,” chief detective Royhardi Siahaan said.

He said that Pujiono Cahyo Widianto, who married the girl in August, may face up to 15 years imprisonment for Criminal Code offenses and for breaching the Child Protection Law, namely the sexual and economic exploitation of a child.

The 43-year-old cleric was declared a suspect after police collected documents officially showing the girl’s age, and after the religious court refused his attempt to register the second marriage. …

Oh, I’m so sorry, Anti-Gays — in your book, “freedom of religion” doesn’t apply to non-Christians, does it?

Related:

Whose Idea of “Traditional Marriage”?, February 28, 2009

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Asia, Christianity, Crime, Islam, Marriage


January 8, 2009

Senegal Sentences Nine Gay Men to Eight Years

What “criminal organization”? Sounds to us like Senegal demonized an HIV/AIDS organization in order to impose the harshest sentence possible:

Senegal jails gay men

Nine gay men were each jailed for eight years by a court in Senegal, the highest such sentence in a country where homosexuality is outlawed, their lawyer and gay rights groups said Wednesday.

The nine, all aged under 30, appeared in court Tuesday charged with “indecent conduct and unnatural acts and membership of a criminal organisation”. They were arrested in December in the Dakar suburb of Mbao.

“This is the first time that the Senegalese legal system hands down such a harsh sentence against gays,” said Issa Diop, one of four defence lawyers representing the men. …

Homosexual acts are punishable with a maximum sentence of five years in Senegal, where 95 percent of the population is Muslim.

However, the judge in the case raised the sentence to eight years after taking into account their “membership of a criminal organisation”. Most of the men belonged to an association set up to fight HIV/AIDS.

A legal source told AFP the men were arrested after police got an anonymous tip-off. “They were arrested while they were in the act and they had pornographic pictures,” the source said. …

Senegalese gay activists say homophobic sentiments have surged in the last year.

In February 2008 a local magazine focusing on celebrity and nightlife published pictures of what it said was a gay marriage. In the ensuing furore, several men seen in the images fled their homes and in some cases the country.

In August, a Belgian and a Senegalese man were sentenced to two-year prison sentences for “unnatural acts”.

And after an HIV-AIDS conference in Dakar in December, an Islamic group denounced as “inappropriate” the part icipation of gays during its proceedings.

More at the link.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Africa, Civil Rights, HIV/AIDS, Homophobia, Islam


December 31, 2008

You Might Think We’d Put “The Battle Over Gay Marriage” At Number One, But No — AU’s Got the Top Ten Spot-On

Role Of Religion In Presidential Campaign Heads 2008 ‘Top Ten’ List Of Church-State Stories

The role of religion in the presidential campaign tops the 2008 “Top Ten” list of top church-state stories, according to the editors of Church & State.

The monthly magazine, published by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, is the nation’s only news periodical devoted exclusively to the intersection of religion and government.

Said Church & State publisher Barry W. Lynn, “It was a wild and crazy year. To tell you the truth, I’m glad it’s coming to a close. I’m hopeful 2009 will be a lot better.”

After studying the past 12 months of news, the editors selected the following 10 stories as the most important and most interesting church-state developments for the year.

1. The Role of Religion in the Presidential Campaign: Not since 1960 when John F. Kennedy the first Roman Catholic president was elected, has religion played such a large role in a presidential campaign. News media representatives grilled candidates on what sins they had committed and what their favorite Bible verses were. Barack Obama fought false rumors that he is secretly a Muslim, and Mitt Romney’s Mormonism became a controversial topic. Candidates were held accountable for the incendiary comments of their pastors and their clergy supporters, such as the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and TV preacher John Hagee. Many observers thought the whole thing was an unholy mess, especially in a nation that separates religion and government.

2. The Resurgence of the Religious Right: While pundits and progressives have proclaimed the demise of the Religious Right, the fundamentalist political movement remained extraordinarily powerful. Republican John McCain found it necessary to name evangelical Sarah Palin as his running mate to mollify the GOP’s restive religious base, and Religious Right forces rammed through bans on same-sex marriage in California, Florida and Arizona. Moderate evangelical Richard Cizik was forced out as government affairs representative at the National Association of Evangelicals after coming under fire from Religious Right forces.

3. The Battle Over Gay Marriage: Bans on same-sex marriage were approved in California, Florida and Arizona with conservative religious forces leading the drive. California’s approval of Proposition 8, with massive funding from members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, was particularly contentious. The Mormons, joined by the Roman Catholic hierarchy and evangelical Protestant congregations, were successful in passing a constitutional amendment that takes away the right of same-sex couples to marry and reflects church doctrine in civil law. The issue now moves back to the state Supreme Court.

4. The Ascendancy of Rick Warren: Once known primarily as a mega-church pastor and best-selling author (The Purpose Driven Life), the Rev. Rick Warren has rapidly moved into position as the nation’s most prominent preacher, despite right-wing views on reproductive freedom, gay rights and church-state separation. Warren, a Southern Baptist who heads Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, Calif., is viewed by progressives as Jerry Falwell in a Hawaiian shirt with an ace PR team. After hosting a presidential debate stacked toward John McCain and being asked to give the invocation at Barack Obama’s inauguration, many think Warren seems destined to be the new Billy Graham.

5. Religious Right Influence at Justice Department: Religious Right influence at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) was exposed this year. According to an internal DOJ investigation reported in the media in July, senior aides in the department used religious and political criteria to hire staff members for non-political positions. Monica Goodling, a top adviser to the attorney general, checked to see if job applicants were “pro-God in public life” and held right-wing views on abortion, homosexuality and other issues. (Goodling is a graduate of TV preacher Pat Robertson’s Regent University.) DOJ also posted a legally dubious memorandum this year insisting that the federal government may give grants to “faith-based” social service agencies that discriminate in hiring, even if Congress has explicitly banned such bias.

6. Battles Over Creationism in Public Schools: New battles have erupted over the teaching of evolution in public schools. Blocked by the courts from teaching fundamentalist religious concepts directly in biology classes, Religious Right forces are trying a backdoor strategy. They are demanding that schools teach the “strengths and weaknesses” of evolution, a euphemism for creationist ideas. Over the heated objections of educators, scientists and civil liberties activists, the Louisiana legislature approved an “academic freedom” law encouraging such instruction in the state’s schools. Now the Texas State Board of Education is debating a similar proposal as part of its 10-year review of science standards.

7. Church Politicking Plot: The Religious Right’s dream of building a fundamentalist church-based political machine took a big step forward in 2008 when more than 30 pastors used their pulpits to endorse Republican political candidates. They acted at the behest of the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), a wealthy Religious Right legal outfit that wants to challenge the federal tax law ban on partisan politicking by tax-exempt groups. The ADF, which was founded by TV preachers and other religious broadcasters, hopes the Internal Revenue Service will revoke participating churches’ tax exemptions leading to a court showdown.

8. Defeat of Jeb Bush Referenda: Florida Gov. Jeb Bush saw his school voucher subsidies for religious and other private schools overturned by the state Supreme Court in 2006. Undeterred, the now former governor’s allies on an obscure tax commission engineered two measures onto the November 2008 ballot that would have repealed the state constitution’s ban on public funding of religion as well as diluted its provision for a strong system of public schools. To Bush’s dismay, the state Supreme Court on Sept. 3 struck the referenda from the ballot, derailing the scheme.

9. Blocking of ‘Christian’ License Plate: The South Carolina legislature unanimously approved a special “Christian” license plate featuring a bright yellow cross, a stained-glass church window and the words “I Believe.” Backed by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, four local clergy and two minority faith groups challenged the government favoritism toward one faith. On Dec. 11, a federal district court blocked issuance of the plates. The judge’s action may forestall similar sectarian plates under consideration in other states.

10. The Christmas Wars: It has become an annual holiday tradition Religious Right groups and their allies in the right-wing media launch a yearly crusade to stop the alleged secularization of Christmas and to pressure government to include Christian symbols in the holiday mix. They rail against stores’ use of the term “Happy Holidays” and insist that advertisements say “Merry Christmas” instead. This year, much of the attention focused on a Washington State battle where an atheist Winter Solstice sign was positioned near a Christian Nativity scene in the state capital. Fox News pundit Bill O’Reilly and an array of Religious Right scolds lambasted Gov. Christine Gregoire for allowing the anti-religious sentiment. Ironically, credit for the atheist display actually should go to the Alliance Defense Fund, a Religious Right legal group that sued Gregoire last year, insisting that the Capitol is an open forum where a Nativity scene (and all other forms of speech) must be allowed.

Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom. Americans Unitied for Separation of Church and State Links: Homepage; Americans United (Press Center); Americans United (Action Center)

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Alliance Defense Fund, Arizona, Barack Obama, California, Catholicism, Church-State Separation, Civil Rights, Creationism, Education/Schools, Election 2008, Florida, Homophobia, Islam, Jeremiah Wright, John McCain, LDS/Mormons, Marriage, Mitt Romney, Press Releases, Proposition 8, Radical Religious Right, Republican Sexcapades, Sarah Palin, Science, Nature & Tech, South Carolina, Texas


December 22, 2008

Obama Thinks He’s Throwing Us A Bone, But He’s Still Just Boning Us

B.F.D.

And I’m disappointed in Tammy Baldwin for allowing her name to be attached to the latest event in the ongoing Obama Bigotfest:

Tammy Baldwin named
honorary inaugural co-chair

President-Obama is nothing if not politically savvy.

Perhaps as a bone to gays upset over Rick Warren’s invitation to give the opening prayer during the inaugural ceremony, the openly lesbian Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) has been named one of 15 honorary co-chairs of the inaugural committee.

Of course, honorary co-chairs are just that - honorary. They don’t do anything. Their names are just on the stationary.

In other Warren news, Katha Pollitt points out that Warren has also disrespected Jewish people -they will burn in hell, he has said - and that Muslim leaders should basically be killed for being “evil.”

Do you think that once Warren’s anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim views become more widespread, Obama will stop defending him?

Answer: Only when he thinks he’s in danger of losing Jewish and Muslim voters, too.

Read Pollitt’s piece, too. (“Speaking of Jews, Warren has publicly stated his belief that they will burn in hell, presumably along with everyone else who hasn’t accepted his particular brand of Christianity (i.e., the vast majority of people in the world). And forget about evolution — the existence of homosexuals, he’s argued, disproves Darwin. And while we may not know how old the Earth is, the Saddleback website assures us that dinosaurs and humans coexisted. Warren claims that his views are mainstream…”)

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Barack Obama, Christianity, Creationism, Hate Speech, Homophobia, Islam, Judaism, Radical Religious Right, Tammy Baldwin


December 9, 2008

Of Course the Vatican Would Rather Execute Us — That’s the Catholic Tradition, After All

Dear Catholics: Before you get all huffy and submit that nasty comment:

1. I’m an ex-Catholic (by choice, not excommunication — yet), so I get to say whatever I want about the Catholic church. (I’d have the right anyway, but lest you think I don’t know what I’m talking about, I was you, so challenging my Catholic cred is a waste of your time.)

2. There’s no other way to read the Vatican statement than the way it’s summed up in the following headline — I couldn’t say it better myself:

Vatican would rather gay people
were executed than married

(and it doesn’t want disabled people to be protected, either, in case it promotes abortion)

The full extent of the regressive nature of the Vatican under Ratzinger was made clear this week when it was revealed that the Vatican had opposed two United Nations resolutions aimed at protecting gay and disabled people from discrimination and death.

When France proposed a resolution seeking all nations to decriminalise homosexuality, the Vatican immediately said it would oppose the resolution. This is despite the fact that up to 70 nations still have legal punishments for gay people including, in some instances, the death penalty. In a number of Islamic countries such as Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Yemen, homosexual acts are still a capital offence.

The UN resolution is due to be proposed by France later this month on behalf of the 27-nation European Union. But Archbishop Celestino Migliore said the Vatican opposed the resolution because it would “add new categories of those protected from discrimination” and could lead to reverse discrimination against traditional heterosexual marriage. …

A strongly worded editorial in Italy’s mainstream La Stampa newspaper said the Vatican’s reasoning was “grotesque”.

Franco Grillini, founder and honorary president of Arcigay, Italy’s leading gay rights group, said the Vatican’s reasoning smacked of “total idiocy and madness”. Mr Grillini said the resolution had nothing to do with gay marriage, but was aimed at stopping the execution of gay people in Islamic countries.

An editorial in Rome’s left-leaning La Repubblica newspaper said the Vatican’s position “leaves one dumbstruck”. Margherita Boniver, a leading member of Italy’s leftist Democratic Party, called it “alarmingly anachronistic”.

The gay rights activist, Grillini, said he feared what he called another “Holy Alliance” between the Vatican and Islamic states at the United Nations to oppose the proposed resolution. …

Meh, I’m not at all “dumbstruck” — it’s nothing more or less than I’d expect from the Holy Roman Inquisitors.

But — oh, yeah — it is indeed “grotesque” “idiocy and madness.”

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Afghanistan, Catholicism, Civil Rights, Europe, Homophobia, Iran, Islam, Marriage, Middle East, Radical Religious Right, Saudi Arabia


November 25, 2008

Must-Read: Richard Rodriguez on Why Churches Fear Gay Marriage

“The crusade for Proposition 8 was fueled by the broken American family, explains gay Catholic author Richard Rodriguez.”

While conservative churches are busy trying to whip up another round of culture wars over same-sex marriage, Rodriquez says the real reason for their panic lies elsewhere: the breakdown of the traditional heterosexual family and the shifting role of women in society and the church itself. As the American family fractures and the majority of women choose to live without men, churches are losing their grip on power and scapegoating gays and lesbians for their failures. …

“American families are under a great deal of stress. The divorce rate isn’t declining, it’s increasing. And the majority of American women are now living alone. We are raising children in America without fathers. …

“The possibility that a whole new generation of American males is being raised by women without men is very challenging for the churches. I think they want to reassert some sort of male authority over the order of things. I think the pro-Proposition 8 movement was really galvanized by an insecurity that churches are feeling now with the rise of women. …

“In such a world, we need to identify the relationship between feminism and homosexuality. … I know a lot of black churches take offense when gay activists say that the gay movement is somehow analogous to the black civil rights movement. And while there is some relationship between the persecution of gays and the anti-miscegenation laws in the United States, I think the true analogy is to the women’s movement. What we represent as gays in America is an alternative to the traditional male-structured society. The possibility that we can form ourselves sexually — even form our sense of what a sex is — sets us apart from the traditional roles we were given by our fathers. …

“…[T]he real challenge to the family right now is male irresponsibility and misbehavior toward women. If the Hispanic Catholic and evangelical churches really wanted to protect the family, they should address the issue of wife beating in Hispanic families and the misbehaviors of the father against the mother. But no, they go after gay marriage. It doesn’t take any brilliance to notice that this is hypocrisy of such magnitude that you blame the gay couple living next door for the fact that you’ve just beaten your wife.

“The pro-8 campaign calls itself the Protect Family Movement, even though the issue of family was the very reason gays needed to have marriage. There are partners in gay unions now who have children, and those children need to be protected. …

“Religions have the capacity for being noble and ennobling but they are also the expression of some of the darkest impulses in us — to go after the “other.” For Christians, if the other isn’t the Muslim, it’s the homosexual. That is the most discouraging part. …

“Then there is the Roman Catholic Church, my own church, which has just come off this extraordinary season of sexual scandal and misbehavior in the rectory against children. The church is barely out of the court and it’s trying to assume the role of governor of sexual behavior, having just proved to America its inability to govern its own sexual behavior.

“Look at the evangelicals. In their insistence that people be born again, they know Americans are broken. …

“Now these churches are going after homosexuals as a way of insisting on their own propriety. They are insisting that they have a role to play in the general society as moral guardians, when what we have seen in the recent past is just the opposite. I mean, it’s one thing for the churches to insist on their right to define the sacrament of marriage for their own members. But it’s quite another for them to insist that they have a right to define the relationships of people outside their communities. That’s really what’s most troubling about Proposition 8. It was a deliberate civic intrusion by the churches. …”

Much, much more:

Why churches fear gay marriage
Jeanne Carstensen, Salon.com

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: California, Catholicism, Christianity, Church-State Separation, Civil Rights, Heterosexuality, Homophobia, Islam, LDS/Mormons, Marriage, Polygamy & Polyamory, Proposition 8, Race/Ethnic Issues, Radical Religious Right, Religion & Spirituality, Women


November 21, 2008

Mormon Lesson of the Day: What Mormons Really Think of Catholics and Protestants

Secret Truths Revealed

Before this election, most non-members knew very little about the Mormon Church outside of the Word of Wisdom and its history of polygamy. However, during this election, the casual viewer of popular message boards will learn many false rumors about the Mormon Church. However, they can also learn many of the somewhat secret truths that the Mormon Church doesn’t publicize. Even long-time members may be learning some of the controversial aspects of Mormon history for the first time.

— Ben, Encino, CA
The 6 Consequences of Prop 8 for the Mormon Church
Signing for Something

Reprinted in full with permission from Rethinking Mormonism:

What has the Mormon Church historically taught about Christianity?

While some current church leaders portray the LDS Church as Christian, the church actually has a long history of condemning Christianity. The church has also stated repeatedly that no one can be saved without the permission of Joseph Smith. The church has even suggested that Islam is better than Christianity.

Mormon Church Condemns Christians

“This is not just another Church. This is not just one of a family of Christian churches. This is the Church and kingdom of God, the only true Church upon the face of the earth…” — Prophet Ezra Taft Benson, Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p.164-165

“In bearing testimony of Jesus Christ, President Hinckley spoke of those outside the Church who say Latter-day Saints ‘do not believe in the traditional Christ.’ ‘No, I don’t. The traditional Christ of whom they speak is not the Christ of whom I speak. For the Christ of whom I speak has been revealed in this the Dispensation of the Fullness of Times. He together with His Father, appeared to the boy Joseph Smith in the year 1820, and when Joseph left the grove that day, he knew more of the nature of God than all the learned ministers of the gospel of the ages.’” — Prophet Gordon B. Hinckley, LDS Church News, June 20, 1998, p.7

“My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right (for at this time it had never entered into my heart that all were wrong)—and which I should join.”

“I was answered by God that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong; and the Personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt; that: “they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.” He again forbade me to join with any of them;…” — Prophet Joseph Smith, Joseph Smith History 1:18-20

“What is it that inspires professors of Christianity generally with a hope of salvation? It is that smooth, sophisticated influence of the devil, by which he deceives the whole world” — Prophet Joseph Smith, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p.270

“…all the priests who adhere to the sectarian religions of the day with all their followers, without one exception, receive their portion with the devil and his angels.” — Prophet Joseph Smith, The Elders Journal, Joseph Smith Jr., editor, vol.1, no.4, p.60

“For centuries men gathered and argued concerning the nature of Deity. Constantine assembled scholars of various factions at Nicaea in the year 325. After two months of bitter debate, they compromised on a definition which for generations has been the doctrinal statement among Christians concerning the Godhead.

“I invite you to read that definition and compare it with the statement of the boy Joseph. He simply says that God stood before him and spoke to him. Joseph could see Him and could hear Him. He was in form like a man, a being of substance. Beside Him was the resurrected Lord, a separate being, whom He introduced as His Beloved Son and with whom Joseph also spoke.

“I submit that in the short time of that remarkable vision Joseph learned more concerning Deity than all of the scholars and clerics of the past.

“This knowledge of Deity, hidden from the world for centuries, was the first and great thing which God revealed to His chosen servant. And upon the reality and truth of this vision rests the validity of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.” — Prophet Gordon B. Hinckley, “The Great Things Which God Has Revealed,” Spring Church Confernece 2005

“Both Catholics and Protestants are nothing less than the ‘whore of Babylon’ whom the Lord denounces by the mouth of John the Revelator as having corrupted all the earth by their fornications and wickedness. Any person who shall be so corrupt as to receive a holy ordinance of the Gospel from the ministers of any of these apostate churches will be sent down to hell with them, unless they repent” — Apostle Orson Pratt, The Seer, p. 255

“And the angel of God said unto me: Behold there are save two churches only; the one is the church of the Lamb of God, and the other is the church of the devil; wherefore, whoso belongeth not to the church of the Lamb of God belongeth to that great church, which is the mother of abominations; and she is the whore of all the earth. And it came to pass that I looked and beheld the whore of all the earth, and she sat upon many waters; and she had dominion over all the earth, among all nations, kindreds, tongues, and people.” — Book of Mormon, 1 Nephi 14:10-11

“After the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was organized, there were only two churches upon the earth. They were known respectively as the Church of the Lamb of God and Babylon. The various organizations which are called churches throughout Christendom, though differing in their creeds and organizations, have one common origin. They all belong to Babylon” — Apostle George Q. Cannon, Gospel Truth, p.324

“When the light came to me I saw that all the so-called Christian world was grovelling in darkness.” — Prophet Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 5:73

“With a regard to true theology, a more ignorant people never lived than the present so-called Christian world.” — Prophet Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 8:199

“The Christian world, so-called, are heathens as to the knowledge of the salvation of God” — Prophet Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 8:171

“Brother Taylor has just said that the religions of the day were hatched in hell. The eggs were laid in hell, hatched on its borders, and then kicked on to the earth.” — Prophet Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 6:176

“Christians — those poor, miserable priests brother Brigham was speaking about — some of them are the biggest whoremasters there are on the earth, and at the same time preaching righteousness to the children of men. The poor devils, they could not get up here and preach an oral discourse, to save themselves from hell; they are preaching their fathers’ sermons — preaching sermons that were written a hundred years before they were born. … You may get a Methodist priest to pour water on you, or sprinkle it on you, and baptize you face foremost, or lay you down the other way, and whatever mode you please, and you will be damned with your priest.” — Apostle Heber C. Kimball, Journal of Discourses, 5:89

“The Gospel of modern Christendom shuts up the Lord, and stops all communication with Him. I want nothing to do with such a Gospel, I would rather prefer the Gospel of the dark ages, so called” — Prophet Wilford Woodruff, Journal of Discourses, vol. 2, p.196

“But as there has been no Christian Church on the earth for a great many centuries past, until the present century, the people have lost sight of the pattern that God has given according to which the Christian Church should be established, and they have denominated a great variety of Christian Churches … But there has been a long apostasy, during which the nations have been cursed with apostate churches in great abundance” — Apostle Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, 18:172

“Christianity…is a perfect pack of nonsense…the devil could not invent a better engine to spread his work than the Christianity of the nineteenth century.” — Prophet Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 6, p.167

“Where shall we look for the true order or authority of God? It cannot be found in any nation of Christendom.” — Prophet John Taylor, Journal of Discourses, 10:127

“What! Are Christians ignorant? Yes, as ignorant of the things of God as the brute beast.” — Prophet John Taylor, Journal of Discourses 13:225

“What does the Christian world know about God? Nothing… Why so far as the things of God are concerned, they are the veriest fools; they know neither God nor the things of God.” — Prophet John Taylor, Journal of Discourses 13:225

“Doctrines were corrupted, authority lost, and a false order of religion took the place of the gospel of Jesus Christ, just as it had been the case in former dispensations, and the people were left in spiritual darkness.” (p. 266). “For hundreds of years the world was wrapped in a veil of spiritual darkness, until there was not one fundamental truth belonging to the place of salvation …Joseph Smith declared that in the year 1820 the Lord revealed to him that all the ‘Christian’ churches were in error, teaching for commandments the doctrines of men.” — Prophet Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 3, p.282

“Instead of having apostles, prophets, and other inspired men in the church now, receiving visions, dreams, revelations, ministry of angels and prophesies for the calling of officers, and for the government of the church–they have a wicked, corrupt, uninspired pope, or uninspired archbishops, bishops, clergymen, etc., who have a great variety of corrupt forms of godliness, but utterly deny the gift of revelation, and every other miraculous power which always characterized Christ’s Church.

“These manmade, powerless, hypocritical, false teachers, make merchandise of the people, by preaching for large salaries, amounting in many instances to tens of thousands of dollars annually. They and their deluded followers are reprobate, denouncing the faith once delivered to the Saints.” — Apostle Orson Pratt, “Divine Authenticity of the Book of Mormon,” page 20

“…the Book of Mormon remains secure, unchanged and unchangeable, …But with the Bible it was not and is not so….it was once in the sole and exclusive care and custody of an abominable organization (Christianity), founded by the devil himself, likened prophetically unto a great whore, whose great aim and purpose was to destroy the souls of men in the name of religion. In these hands it ceased to be the book it once was.” — Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, The Joseph Smith Translation, pp. 12, 13

“Must we, under the broad folds of the American Constitution, be compelled to bow down to the narrow contracted notions of Apostate Christianity? Must we shut up our consciences in a nut shell, and be compelled to submit to the bigoted notions, and whims, and customs of the dark ages of popery, transferred to us through the superstitious of our fathers? Must we be slaves to custom and render homage to the soul-destroying, sickening influences of modern Christianity? No!” — Apostle Orson Pratt, The Seer, Vol.1, No.7, p.111

“And also those to whom these commandments were given, might have power to lay the foudation of this (Mormon) church, and to bring it forth out of obscurity and out of darkness, the only true and living church upon the face of the whole earth…” — Supposedly Jesus Christ Himself, Doctrine and Covenants 1:30

Salvation not Through Jesus Christ, but Joseph Smith?

“If we get our salvation, we shall have to pass by the Prophet Joseph Smith; if we enter our glory, it will be through the authority he has received. We cannot get around him.” — 1988 Melchizedek Priesthood Study Guide, p. 142, Apostle George Q. Cannon quoted

“Our entire case as members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints rests on the validity of this glorious First Vision. … Nothing on which we base our doctrine, nothing we teach, nothing we live by is of greater importance than this initial declaration. I submit that if Joseph Smith talked with God the Father and His Beloved Son, then all else of which he spoke is true. This is the hinge on which turns the gate that leads to the path of salvation and eternal life.” — Prophet Gordon B. Hinckley, Ensign, Nov. 1998, pp.70-71

[There is] “no salvation without accepting Joseph Smith. If Joseph Smith was verily a prophet, and if he told the truth…no man can reject that testimony without incurring the most dreadful consequences, for he cannot enter the kingdom of God” — Prophet Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 1, p.190

“No man or woman in this dispensation will ever enter into the celestial kingdom of God without the consent of Joseph Smith…every man and woman must have the certificate of Joseph Smith, junior, as a passport to their entrance into the mansion where God and Christ are… [Joseph Smith] reigns there as supreme a being in his sphere, capacity, and calling, as God does in heaven. Many will exclaim—”Oh, that is very disagreeable! It is preposterous! We cannot bear the thought!” But it is true.” — Prophet Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 7, p.289-91

“He that confesseth not that Jesus has come in the flesh and sent Joseph Smith with the fullness of the Gospel to this generation, is not of God, but is anti-christ” — Prophet Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 9, p.312

“I tell you, Joseph holds the keys, and none of us can get into the celestial kingdom without passing by him. We have not got rid of him, but he stands there as the sentinel, holding the keys of the kingdom of God; and there are many of them beside him. I tell you, if we get past those who have mingled with us, and know us best, and have a right to know us best, probably we can pass all other sentinels as far as it is necessary, or as far as we may desire. But I tell you, the pinch will be with those that have mingled with us, stood next to us, weighed our spirits, tried us, and proven us: there will be a pinch, in my view, to get past them. The others, perhaps, will say, If brother Joseph is satisfied with you, you may pass. If it is all right with him, it is all right with me. Then if Joseph shall say to a man, or if brother Brigham say to a man, I forgive you your sins, “Whosoever sins ye remit they are remitted unto them;” if you who have suffered and felt the weight of transgression—if you have generosity enough to forgive the sinner, I will forgive him: you cannot have more generosity than I have. I have given you power to forgive sins, and when the Lord gives a gift, he does not take it back again.” — Apostle Orson Hyde, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 6, p.154-155

“It is to be feared that in course of a century, some gifted man like Paul, some splendid orator, who will be able by his eloquence to attract crowds of the thousands who are ever ready to hear, and be carried away by, the sounding brass and tinkling cymbal of sparkling oratory, may command a hearing, may succeed in breathing a new life into this modern Mahometanism, and make the name of the martyred Joseph ring as loud, and stir the souls of men as much, as the mighty name of Christ itself. Sharon, Palmyra, Manchester, Kirtland, Far West, Adam-ondi-Ahman, Ramus. Nauvoo, and the Carthage Jail, may become holy and venerable names, places of classic interest, in another age; like Jerusalem, the Garden of Gethsemane, the Mount of Olives, and Mount Calvary to the Christian, and Mecca and Medina to the Turk.” — Prophet Brigham Young, History of the Church, Vol. 7, p.40-41

Islam Better than Chistianity?

“The Greek and Roman Churches, which have been called Christian, and which take the name of Christians as a cloak, have worshipped innumerable idols. On this account, on the simple subject of the Deity and His worship, if nothing more, I should rather incline, of the two, after all my early traditions, education, and prejudices, to the side of Mahomet, for on this point he is on the side of truth, and the Christian world on the side of idolatry and heathenism.” — Apostle Parley P. Pratt, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 3, p.38

“..instead of saying that Mahometanism prevailed against Christianity, and that Christianity was in danger of being done away by its prevalence, we would rather say, that where Mahometanism prevailed, it taught and established one truth at least, viz., the true and living God, and so far as this went, it did preserve people from worshipping idols. And had the crescent waved on the tower of London, or on the church of St. Paul, instead of the cross, and had the Mahometan religion been enforced instead of the Roman religion that was enforced for a series of generations, and had tradition riveted what the sword enforced, then that nation and the surrounding nations would have been worshippers of one true God instead of idols; they would have recognized it in theory at least, whether they would have worshipped Him in spirit and in truth or not. But now [Christians] do not recognize Him in theory, for they acknowledge as their god an imaginary being without body, parts, or passions.” — Apostle Parley P. Pratt, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 3, p.39

“Now, if we take Mahometanism during those dark ages, and the corruptions that are so universally prevalent over the earth, and the idolatrous systems of religion, falsely called Christianity, and weigh them in a balance; with all my education in favor of Christian nations and Christian powers, and Christian institutions, so called, with all my prejudices of early youth, and habits of thought and reading, my rational faculties would compel me to admit that the Mahometan history and Mahometan doctrine was a standard raised against the most corrupt and abominable idolatry that over perverted our earth, found in the creeds and worship of Christians, falsely so named.” — Apostle Parley P. Pratt, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 3, p.40

“Though Mahometan institutions are corrupt enough, and need reforming by the Gospel, I am inclined to think, upon the whole, leaving out the corruptions of men in high places among them, that they have better morals and better institutions than many Christian nations; and in many localities there have been high standards of morals. So far as that one point is concerned, of worshipping the one true God under the name of Mahometanism, together with many moral precepts, and in war only acting on the defensive, I think they have exceeded in righteousness and truthfulness of religion, the idolatrous and corrupt church that has borne the name of Christianity.” — Apostle Parley P. Pratt, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 3, p.41

But wait! There’s more!

From the always-enlightening ExMormon.org:

Behold the Great and Abominable Church

Subject: Behold the Great and Abominable Church (references)

Here are some references to Mormon leaders and scriptures that refer to the “Great and Abominable Church” and “Great Whore of All the Earth”

What would you think of Catholicism if you believed this stuff?

Both Catholics and Protestants are nothing less than the “whore of Babylon” whom the Lord denounces…”
- The Seer, Vol.2, No.4, p.255

The Roman Catholic, Greek, and Protestant church is the great corrupt ecclesiastic power, represented by great Babylon which has made all nations drunk with her wickedness, and she must fall, after she has been warned with the sound of the everlasting gospel. Her overthrow will be by a series of the most terrible judgments which will quickly succeed each other, and sweep over the nations where she has her dominion, and at last she will be utterly burned by fire, for thus hath the Lord spoken. Great, and fearful, and most terrible judgments are decreed upon these corrupt powers, the nations of modern Christendom; for strong is the Lord God who shall execute His fierce wrath upon them, and He will not cease until He has made a full end, and until their names be blotted out from under heaven.”
- Apostle Orson Pratt, Divine Authenticity of the Book of Mormon, p.84 - p.85

1 Nephi 13:5-6:
And the angel said unto me: Behold the formation of a church which is most abominable above all other churches, which slayeth the saints of God, yea, and tortureth them and bindeth them down, and yoketh them with a yoke of iron, and bringeth them down into captivity. And it came to pass that I beheld this great and abominable church; and I saw the devil that he was the founder of it.

. . .

Subject: Here’s some more favorites for missionaries to bash Catholics…

“It was the apostate Catholics that first originated the idea and by them the fatal delusion has been handed down from generation to generation; and all the children that she has brought forth, or that have left her communion, have, more or less, imbibed the same great features of the apostasy. Well might the Revelator John, speaking by the spirit of prophecy, call her “the Mother of Harlots and abominations of the earth!” It is her true name, for all the “harlots” which she has brought forth have walked in the footsteps of their “Mother” in declaring against new revelation, and in pretending that ancient revelation is a sufficient rule of faith. It is to be expected that as is the Mother, so will be her Harlot daughters. …In the meantime, another harlot daughter of the Catholics–the Lutherans…”
- Apostle Orson Pratt, Divine Authenticity of the Book of Mormon, p.40

. . .

“Babylon, literally understood, is the gay world; spiritual wickedness, the golden city, and the glory of the world, The priests of Egypt, who received a portion gratis from Pharaoh; the priests of Baal, and the Pharisees, and Sadducees, with their “long robes,” among the Jews, are equally included in their mother’s family, with the Roman Catholics, Protestants, and all that have not had the keys of the kingdom and power thereof, according to the ordinances of God.
- Prophet John Taylor, Times and Seasons, Vol.6, No.1, p.939

. . .

Much, much more of what the Mormon church really thinks of Catholics and Protestants, at the link.

Mormon Lesson of the Day #1:
How the Mormon Church Mobilizes Its Members Politically — And Why It Works

Mormon Lesson of the Day #2:
Forget the Milk — Let’s Skip Right to the Meat

Mormon Lesson of the Day #3:
Sword-Wielding Angel Forced Joseph Smith Into Polygamy With Teenagers & Women Who Were Already Married

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: California, Catholicism, Christianity, Civil Rights, Hate Speech, Islam, LDS/Mormons, Marriage, Proposition 8, Radical Religious Right


October 4, 2008

AU Listens in on Jim Garlow/Concerned Women for America’s Game Plan to Subvert Legal Marriage in California

Sandhya Bathija at Americans United reports on the October 2nd conference call led by “Pastor Jim Garlow of Skyline Wesleyan Church in La Mesa who is the leader and initiator of Proposition 8″:

My Call From God’s Army:
CWA ‘Draftees’ Aim To Pass California’s Proposition 8

… “None of us really want to be doing this” Garlow said. “I could have been sitting on the beach. But I didn’t volunteer, God drafted me. I don’t have a choice. And God drafted you too, or you wouldn’t be in the CWA.”

Pastor Garlow said he would refer to the CWA women campaigning for Proposition 8 not as mere volunteers but as “draftees.”

This militaristic-type rhetoric continued throughout the call. Garlow continued with a story emphasizing why CWA women needed to fight for Proposition 8.

“When I find myself up past the midnight hour,” he said, “asking ‘why am I doing this?’ I think of the conversation that took place in Cairo, Egypt, between an Egyptian Christian pastor who has been severely persecuted by Islam and a man named Lou Engle” (Engle is the theocracy-minded founder of The Call, a fundamentalist youth movement, who is leading a 40-day fast to pass Proposition 8.)

“When Lou was in Cairo, Egypt,” Garlow continued, “this pastor said to him, as a pastor that suffers at the hands of radical Islam, he said, ‘The eyes of the world are on California. We’re watching California and the vote on marriage. Because if you fail there to stop it, if you fail to stop it, what will be unleashed across the world will be a spirit worse than radical Islam.’”

Wow. So same-sex marriage is worse than terrorism? What kind of radical worldview is that? …

“God’s hand is on this project, CWA founder Beverly LaHaye said on this conference call. …

More bone-chilling insanity at the link.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: California, Christianity, Church-State Separation, Civil Rights, Concerned Women, Hate Speech, Homophobia, Islam, Marriage, Proposition 8, Radical Religious Right


September 28, 2008

Baghdad Safe-House Coordinator Bashar, 27, Assassinated

From UK Gay News, Peter Tatchell’s statement of September 25:

This morning, I received news from Iraq that the coordinator of Iraqi LGBT in Baghdad, Bashar, aged 27, a university student, has been assassinated in a barber shop.

Militias burst in and sprayed his body with bullets at point blank range.

He was the organiser of the safe houses for gays and lesbians in Baghdad. His efforts saved the lives of dozens of people.

Bashar was a kind, generous and extremely brave young man — a true hero who put his life on the line to save the lives of others.

My thoughts go out to his loved ones and to the other members of Iraqi LGBT.

Their courage is an inspiration to all people everywhere fighting against injustice.

See also:

Newsweek Brings Murderous Oppression of Gay Iraqis to Forefront
August 28, 2008

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Hate Crimes, Homophobia, Iraq, Islam, Middle East, R.I.P., Radical Religious Right


August 28, 2008

Newsweek Brings Murderous Oppression of Gay Iraqis to Forefront

Good on Newsweek. There are still far too many people (especially on the so-called Left) who stick their fingers in their ears and go “Lalalalalalala!” when it comes to the government-sanctioned slaughter of our Middle Eastern brothers and sisters.

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Do Kill

Nobody wants to talk about gays in Iraq,
much less who is killing them.

When militiamen from the Mahdi Army came by the compact, two-story stone home in the Doura neighborhood of Baghdad, they weren’t looking for Sunnis to harass. They were hunting gays. “Bring us your son’s cell phone,” one ordered the middle-aged man who came to the gate. … This time they left, but vowed to come back if they found any evidence he was gay — or was talking to undesirable foreigners. Now that Iraq’s sectarian war has cooled off, it’s open season on homosexuals and others who infuriate religious hardliners. …

Iraqi authorities scoffed at the subject [of gays in Iraq] — when not scolding a reporter for even asking about it. …

As with a number of Muslim societies where homosexuality is officially nonexistent but widely practiced, the policy in Iraq during Saddam Hussein’s rule was “don’t ask, don’t tell.” But that has changed. Iraqi LGBT, the London NGO that Nadir works for, says more than 430 gay men have been murdered in Iraq since 2003. …

The only recourse for Iraqi gays seems to come from activists abroad. Iraqi LGBT, which was founded to defend the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Iraqis, looks after about 40 young men between the ages of 14 and 28 in several Baghdad safe houses. There they are fed, can watch TV, hang out and sleep in cramped quarters, their beds inches apart. They stay away from neighbors and rarely leave their immediate area. …

Saif, one of the older residents at an Iraqi LGBT house, recalls Saddam’s repressive but secular regime wistfully. “Those were the most beautiful days of our lives,” he says. “The fall [of Saddam] was the worst thing to happen.”

Most people seem to prefer that the subject just go away. A written request for an interview at the Legal Section of the Ministry of Human Rights was greeted with a suggestion to delete the word “gays.” A sympathetic senior government official warned that a direct request to talk to a minister about gays could result in a short conversation. “I would ask about women, displaced people, children and others before you get to that,” he offered. …

Even relatively liberal people in Iraq seem to have harsh attitudes toward this subject. “These people are not welcome in the society because they are against the social, natural and religious rules,” said one well-educated Iraqi who did not want to be identified more closely. A Baghdad executive said religion and tradition have made the overwhelming majority of Iraqis hostile to homosexuals. “Nobody is interested in talking about this at all,” he says with a grim chuckle. …

More at the link.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Hate Crimes, Homophobia, Iraq, Islam


June 18, 2008

Overzealous Obamaniacs bar Muslims from Obama photo-op

Shameful:

Muslims barred from picture at Obama event

Two Muslim women at Barack Obama’s rally in Detroit Monday were barred from sitting behind the podium by campaign volunteers seeking to prevent the women’s headscarves from appearing in photographs or on television with the candidate.

The campaign has apologized to the women, both Obama supporters who said they felt betrayed by their treatment at the rally.

“This is of course not the policy of the campaign. It is offensive and counter to Obama’s commitment to bring Americans together and simply not the kind of campaign we run,” said Obama spokesman Bill Burton. “We sincerely apologize for the behavior of these volunteers.”

Building a human backdrop to a political candidate, a set of faces to appear on television and in photographs, is always a delicate exercise in demographics and political correctness. Advance staffers typically pick supporters out of a crowd to reflect the candidate’s message.

When Obama won North Carolina amid questions about his ability to connect with white voters, for instance, he stood in front of a group of middle-aged white women waving small American flags. On the Republican side, a Hispanic New Hampshire Democrat, Roberto Fuentes, told Politico that he was recently asked, and declined, to contribute to the “diversity” of the crowd behind Sen. John McCain at a Nashua event.

But for Obama, the old-fashioned image-making contrasts with his promise to transcend identity politics and to embrace all elements of America. The incidents in Michigan, which has one of the largest Arab and Muslim populations in the country, also raise an aspect of his campaign that sometimes rubs Muslims the wrong way: The candidate has vigorously denied a false, viral rumor that he himself is Muslim. But the denials seem to some at times to imply that there is something wrong with the faith, though Obama occasionally adds that he means no disrespect to Islam.

“I was coming to support him, and I felt like I was discriminated against by the very person who was supposed to be bringing this change, who I could really relate to,” said Hebba Aref, a 25-year-old lawyer who lives in the Detroit suburb of Bloomfield Hills. “The message that I thought was delivered to us was that they do not want him associated with Muslims or Muslim supporters.”

In Detroit on Monday, the two different Obama volunteers — in separate incidents — made it clear that headscarves wouldn’t be in the picture. The volunteers gave different explanations for excluding the hijabs, one bluntly political and the other less clear.

In Aref’s case, there was no ambiguity. …

Good for Camp O with the quick apology — but you’ve got to wonder what drives some of these volunteers; aren’t they required to, er, graduate from Camp Obama Basic Training or anything before being given this kind of (ir)responsibility? If not, why not? And if so, are they not getting the message — or is there something wrong with the message itself?

In any case, that’s some Unity Pony they got goin’ there.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Barack Obama, Election 2008, Islam, Michigan, Random Bigotry, Random Stupidity


April 21, 2008

Hey, Barack! How do you plan to “reach out” to this guy?

Church Sign Causes Controversy

A sign is causing heated arguments outside of a church in Jonesville (South Carolina).

Pastor Roger Byrd of Jonesville Church of God put the sign up which reads “Obama Osama humm are they brothers?”

Pastor Byrd says the sign is not meant to be racial or political but rather to make people think. “His name is so close to Osama I have a feeling he might be Islamic therefore he doesn’t recognize Christ,” Pastor Byrd said. …

Pastor Byrd told News Channel 7 he would ask his congregation to vote on whether to keep the sign. They voted unanimously to keep the sign up Sunday night.

Jonesville Church of God does not have any African American members.

Well, Barry, is this one of those “voices of those who still need to be convinced”?

After all, aren’t there a lot of “good, decent, moral people in this country who do not yet embrace their” Muslim or black “brothers and sisters as full members of our shared community”?

If reaching out to rabid homophobes and overlooking the most flagrant, rank episodes of sexism and hate speech from anybody who can raise a quick buck or give you a hint of street cred with your constituents are integral parts of your master game plan, then you must have already figured out how you’re going to bring the rest of the Christofacists (and racists! don’t forget racists!) into your mythical big tent.

Let’s see what kind of “uniter” you are now, Barry.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Barack Obama, Islam, Race/Ethnic Issues, Radical Religious Right, Random Bigotry


April 7, 2008

I take back everything I said about Barack Obama…

…not being a homophobe. He is a homophobe.

How many times have you heard one of the anti-gay brigades (oh, I don’t know — just pick your favorite gay-hater, like Pat Robertson, or some idiot from the American Family Association) protest, “I am not homophobic!” quickly followed by the explanation that a “phobia” means you’re really a-skeered of something? “I’m not homophobic,” they say, “because I am not afraid of homosexuals.”

You know, and I know, that that’s just so much horse puckey, as the definition of “homophobia” has evolved to mean an aversion to — and usually outright hostility toward — homsexuality, and gay people.

But the tighty righties do have a point. If we’re going to do a Greg Brady and live by exact words (or definitions), then technically the gay-haters of the world are not homophobic — they don’t (usually) run screaming in fear at the sight of k.d. lang.

So, until now, I’ve been, yes, defending Barack Obama as not-a-homophobe. In truth, he fits the non-literal, right-winger definition of a homophobe — one who is averse to gay and lesbian people, but not necessarily scared of us.

Well, I take it back. Obama is scared of us. I’m certain of it.

What happened to make me so certain occurred a few days ago, but I’m glad I waited to blog about it, because some other interesting stuff has come to light since.

I’m talking about the April 4-16, 2008, issue of the Philadelphia Gay News. Here’s the front page:


The headline says: “Clinton talks; Obama balks.”

The little box in the middle of the big white space says (misspelling of “Barack” deliberate or not): “It’s been 1,522 days since Sen. Barak Obama has spoken with local gay press. See EDITORIAL, Page 11.”

And on page 11, we find:

At this point in the Democratic presidential campaign, we’re able to view the candidates by their actions. And we have found that Sen. Barack Obama would rather talk at the LGBT community than with it. While Sen. Hillary Clinton has been accessible to the local LGBT press with numerous “no rules” interviews, Obama simply has not. The fact is that Obama has spoken with the gay press only twice, and one of those interviews, which appeared in chicago’s Windy City Times, was in 2004 before he became a U.S. senator. The other limited interview occurred after controversy erupted when his campaign added an anti-gay minister to his tour of the South. It has now been 1,522 days since Obama has been accessible to our community. The question is now this: Is he trying to play it safe or has he become a managed candidate?

But there’s more to this story.

The LGBT press, which has been fighting for respect since its inception, expected this to be the year that candidates would respond to us as they do to the Hispanic, black and other community press… The local gay press is to our community what churches are to the black community — our lifeline for information. The local gay press now has a national weekly audience of some 2.2. million readers, not including our Web sites. Collectively, we reach more LGBT people than any other source. While Obama has issued numerous statements, he has only granted one interview in this campaign. This begs the question, is he uncomfortable with the LGBT community? …

So whom has he spoken with in that time? Christianity Today, local Philadelphia sports radio station, Grist and Paris Match. Guess he’s going for the French vote.

After giving PGN the runaround, PGN complained to Obama’s communications director that the campaign’s “actions, not just to PGN, but to the entire LGBT press, have been disrespectful,” noting that Republicans Bob Casey and Arlen Specter (no friends to the gay community, they) and even “nightstick-carrying” former Mayor Frank Rizzo have granted interviews to PGN.

“The last candidate running for office that refused an interview with PGN,” the paper reminds us, “was Sen. Rick Santorum.”

PGN then speaks directly to Obama, whomping him over the head with this hard little truth: “We were treated with more respect by Republican John McCain’s campaign than yours.”

The lone interview Obama has given during this campaign was to The Advocate, in which he made a pitifully lame attempt to defuse the outrage over the Donnie McClurkin insult (and during which he stepped even deeper into his own doo-doo by suggesting that queers and Democrats — as if the two groups were mutually exclusive — are “hermetically sealed from the faith community”).

And that interview was six months ago.

(And, for the record, the pandering, meaningless campaign ads he took out in gay print publications just prior to the Ohio and Texas primaries do not count as “interviews.” Neither does his appearance at the LOGO debate; for one thing, his absence would have been more than conspicuous, and for another, the questions lobbed at him weren’t even softballs, but wiffle balls.)

So what, you say? So, Obama hasn’t given an interview to the gay media (even the outlets that support him) since.

And it’s not like he hasn’t been asked. Repeatedly.

Which brings us to Gay People’s Chronicle reporter Eric Resnick, whose guest article for The Bilerico Project — written a full month before the PGN story — details his exasperation with the Obama campaign’s genuine homo-phobia:

Immediately following the February 18 Wisconsin presidential primary, I began, on behalf of the Gay People’s Chronicle, to work on getting interviews with Democrats Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. …

Both candidates were approached for interviews through multiple routes, including calls and e-mail directly to their Ohio and national press offices, through the Ohio Democratic Party, and through LGBT individuals working at high levels with the campaigns.

Initially, both campaigns were thrilled to be asked for interviews.

The Obama campaign stopped being “thrilled” after Resnick laid out two simple ground rules: no surrogates, and live interviews only — “no written statements or written questions.” (Resnick reflects: “Having candidates only speak through open letters and privately to small groups offering endorsement does not build confidence.”)

That was Wednesday. On Thursday, the Obama campaign offered an open letter in lieu of an interview. I told them no. I can’t ask a letter questions. Then they suggested written questions, even though I told them earlier that wouldn’t be acceptable. Again, I told them no.

By Friday, about the time it would take for them to figure out the [New Jersey Civil Union Review Commission report] contradicts their candidate, the Obama campaign stopped returning my calls. When I was lucky enough to reach press staff, they were very quick to tell me they didn’t think they could work an interview into the candidate’s schedule.

Resnick (who, it must be noted, is a Kucinich supporter with no dog in this fight) wisely follows his editor’s edict not to “speculate in the article as to why the Obama campaign got cold” — but adds that “reasonable people can come to reasonable conclusions.”

Resnick goes on to compare the way Obama “denounced” and “rejected” the endorsement of Louis Farrakhan (albeit under heavy pressure from Tim Russert and finally Hillary Clinton, whose support was not solicited, with the way Obama refused to do the same with Donnie McClurkin, whose support was solicited.

Had Obama used the same rationale to explain Farrakhan, the Jewish community would have been irate.

Resnick wanted to ask Obama to “explain the difference between McClurkin and Farrakhan.” A fair question indeed — but one with which the Obama campaign took umbrage:

The Obama campaign, however, treated the question with indignation, claimed that the reporter mischaracterized events, and erroneously claimed that “Senator Obama spoke out against the hateful views of both Donnie McClurkin and Louis Farrakhan.”

As far as the Obama campaign is concerned, the issue was resolved last January:

It is also apparent that Obama sees his obligation to the LGBT community as fulfilled since his Martin Luther King Day speech at Ebenezer Baptist Church where he called on African-Americans to work against homophobia. …

Obama spokespeople pivot to the MLK Day speech as though it settles every debt to the LGBT community, past and future.

This attitude is mirrored, ad nauseam, by Obama supporters. (If we had a nickel for every Obamabot who rails hysterically against any mention of McClurkin with “Obama spoke out against homophobia! In a black church! What more do you want from him?!” we would have many, many nickels.)

Finally, Resnick’s frustration explodes, and rightfully so:

In my 12 years as a reporter, I have never experienced anything quite like Obama’s national communication director Robert Gibbs, either.

I wasn’t biting on the crap he tried to feed me, and he got offended.

When I stood there not writing any of it down, Gibbs said to me, “Let me tell you how this works. I talk and you write down what I say.”

“I’ll write down what you say when you answer the question,” I responded, adding that “I’m no campaign’s stenographer.”

Gibbs actually took the pen and pad out of my hands and wrote his own answer!

Take a moment to catch your breath. No matter how many times I read that last sentence, I’m still flabbergasted.

I’m not so sure what I’m flabbergasted by, however — that the media contact for a major presidential campaign would act like such a jerk, or by the now-obvious fact that the bullying so characteristic of Obama supporters is not some strange fluke, some spontaneously-generated anomaly, something isolated or unusual, but comes from the top down.

I’ve long believed that there was no way the Obama campaign could possibly be as nasty as Obama’s supporters — but that there must be something about Obama that evokes such nastiness.

(What kind of nastiness? How about the reason behind the exodus of Hillary supporters from DailyKos? How about the reason for the similar exodus of Hillary supporters from Democratic Underground (which really should be renamed “Obama Underground”)? How about the treatment of Hillary supporters at various state caucuses? How about Randi Rhodes calling Hillary Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro “effing whores“? How about the way one relatively levelheaded Obama supporter gets the crap kicked out of her for daring to “beg” her fellow Obamanuts to “stop the hatred”? And they wonder why we call them a cult?)

Back in January, I mused:

It’s no secret that the Obama cult is creeping us out. In meatspace conversations, I’ve opined, many times, that while Obama himself may not be entirely responsible for the drooling infatuation of far too many slack-jawed, glassy-eyed Obamaniacs (who react with sheer hostility when you ask them to cut the “He’s so inpirational!” crap and actually define their idol’s policies), he’s not doing anything to tamp down the frenzy, either.

You have to wonder what “inspires” this kind of cult-like frenzy in the first place. Obviously, there’s something The Man is saying, or doing, that taps into some primeval instinct devoid of rationale. Do they implant chips in Obamaniacs’ brains at every rally? Are they beaming some sort of subliminal signal through the TV during Obama’s speeches that turns viewers’ brains to mush?

Ironically, when I wrote that, the answer was staring me right in the face: I was blogging about the indocrination of Obama supporters by campaign organizers.

I didn’t fully realize then that the hate is coming from the top. (Can you say “monster“? Can you say “Barack & Randi, Cozy As Can Be“?)

The Obama campaign is based in Hillary Hate, and Obama’s supporters are soaking in it.

But I digress. As usual. Back to the rightfully-exasperated Mr. Resnick, and the practical slap in the face he got from Obama mouthpiece Robert Gibbs:

Would Gibbs treat a New York Times reporter this way? How about a Cleveland Plain Dealer reporter?

Look, both senators Obama and Clinton are opportunists. Either would throw us under the bus for their own political advancement. That’s why, both lawyers who know that separate is not equal, continue to claim that civil unions are equal to marriage. …

Both campaigns knew that talking to me wasn’t going to be like the made for Saturday Night Live performance of Melissa Etheridge on the Logo forum. (This is not an insult to Etheridge. I can’t sing. We should all do what we’re good at.)

Nonetheless, it was Hillary Clinton, with her much longer record of talking to our community, who stepped up to the guillotine, and Obama who refused.

Here’s another article you’ll want to read on this subject:

Segal: Obama Hasn’t Spoken to Gay Press Since 2004

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Barack Obama, Donnie McClurkin, Election 2008, Hate Speech, Hillary Clinton, Homophobia, Islam, John McCain, Media, Rick Santorum


March 11, 2008

Who is Sally Kern, and Why Did Oklahomans Elect Such a Hate-Filled Sow to the State House?

Republican (of course) Oklahoma state Representative Sally Kern — “representative” of no one but lying, delusional, gay-bashing bigots — got caught on tape bashing queers with her perverted brand of Christianity, repeating outright lies from the Paul Cameron School of Making Up Shit for Fun and Profit, and then claiming she’s not a lying, delusional, gay-bashing bigot.

Oh, and Muslims? She slammed you, too. Big-time.

Buffy’s got the audio, and Kern’s contact info should you care to share your reaction.

And here, out of Kern’s rambling style peppered with lots of “ums” and “ers” and “okays,” are the choicest bits of her vile spew:

The homosexual agenda is destroying this nation. ‘k? It’s just a fact. Not everybody’s lifestyle is equal, just like not all religions are equal. Y’know?

. . .

I’m not gay-bashing, but according to God’s word that is not the right kind of lifestyle. It has deadly consequences for those people involved in it, they have more suicides, uh, and they’re more discouraged, there’s more illness, they’re have — lifespans are shorter.

. . .

It’s not a lifestyle that is good for this nation. As a matter of fact, studies show that no society that has totally embraced homosexuality has lasted more than, you know, a few decades. So it’s the death knell of this country.

. . .

I honestly think it’s the biggest threat … that our nation has, even more so than terrorism. Or Islam, which I think is a big threat.

. . .

What’s happening now, they’re going after … in schools, two year-olds! You know why they’re trying to get early childhood education? They want to get our young children into the government schools so they can indoctrinate them.

. . .

They’re going after our young children, as young as two years of age, to try to teach them that the homosexual lifestyle is the acceptable lifestyle.

. . .

Gays are infiltrating city councils. … Have you heard that the City Council of Eureka Springs is now controlled by gays? … There are some others … Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Tacoma … in Vermont, Oregon, West Palm Beach, Florida…

. . .

One of the things I did with in our legislature … a bill last year, that would notify parents … what clubs their students were involved in. And the reason I did that bill, primarily, was this: we have the gay-straight alliance coming into our schools. Kids are getting involved in these groups, their lives are being ruined, their parents don’t know about it! So I introduced a bill that said, you have to notify all clubs and things. And one of my colleagues said, “Well, you know we don’t have a gay problem in my county. So that’s why I’m voting against that bill.” Well you know what? To me that is so dumb. If you’ve got cancer or something in your little toe, do you say, “Well, I’m just gonna forget about it, ’cause the rest of you is fine”? It spreads! Okay? And this, this stuff is deadly and it’s spreading and it will destroy our young people and it will destroy this nation.

What a hateful, mean, stupid human being.

We’ll follow up on the fallout (which has already begun) shortly.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Family Research Council, Hate Speech, Homophobia, Islam, Oklahoma, Radical Religious Right, Republicans


October 31, 2007

When You Can’t Get A Date In Your Own Country…

…without taking the chance of being put to death, maybe rejection makes you crazy enough to beat the crap out of the object of your lust so he won’t tell your brother you violated Sharia law:

UAE sheikh to stand trial for ’sexually motivated’ assault

The brother of the ruler of the United Arab Emirates, one of the richest men in the world, is to stand trial in Switzerland for an alleged assault on an Italian-American businessman in the bar of an exclusive Geneva hotel [four years ago].

. . .

[Silvano Orsi], 39, claims that he was repeatedly attacked after refusing homosexual advances from [37-year-old Sheikh Falah bin Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan] and has since been unable to work because of his injuries. The sheikh, in evidence to a pre-trial closed hearing last year, claimed that he merely had a 30-second scuffle after he was accused of being gay.

. . .

Mr Orsi, of Rochester, New York, says he was having a late evening drink with a Saudi friend when the sheikh sent over an unsolicited bottle of champagne. It remained unopened on the table and a few minutes later, according to Mr Orsi, the shiekh came over and accosted him. When he resisted, the sheikh attacked him and beat him savagely his belt.

Despite the sheikh’s bodyguards trying to intervene Mr Orsi says the assault continued as he retreated to the reservation desk. He says he sustained a herniated disc, nerve damage in his right leg and post-traumatic stress disorder. Before he left the hotel, Mr Orsi says, the Emirate’s consul in Geneva arrived at the hotel and offered him €13,000 to keep quiet.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Crime, Islam, Middle East


October 17, 2007

Uganda Wants to Send Gays to Island, So “They Die Out There”

AllAfrica.com brings us the latest plan in the all-consuming campaign to eradicate queers from Uganda:

Uganda: Mufti Wants Gays Abandoned On Islands

The Mufti, Sheikh Ramathan Shaban Mubajje wants gays marooned on an island in Lake Victoria until they die. Sheikh Mubajje told journalists on Friday at Old Kampala Mosque that he sold his proposal to President Yoweri Museveni when they met last week at Hotel Africana.

“I asked President Museveni to get us an island on Lake Victoria and we take these homosexuals and they die out there,” Sheikh Mubajje said during a press briefing after Idd el Fitr prayers.

“If they [gays] die there then we shall have no more homosexuals in the country.”

. . .

Sheikh Mubajje said homosexuality could lead to moral decay in the society if left to blossom.

. . .

The Mufti’s statement correlates with recent plans by the Muslim Tabliq youth to form what they called an ‘Anti-Gay Squad to fight homosexuality in the country.

. . .

“We are ready to act swiftly and form this squad. It is the work of the community to put an end to bad practices like homosexuality.” he said.

To “If they [gays] die there then we shall have no more homosexuals in the country,” Buffy replies: “As if no more would be born in the future, you idiot.”

Discuss this story

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Africa, Hate Speech, Homophobia, Islam, Radical Religious Right


 

 
The newest and sexiest books are just a click away.
 

Latest Comments to
The Lavender Newswire
and
The Gaytheist Agenda


 

 

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 1145 access attempts in the last 7 days.