July 12, 2009

South Korean News Reports Kim Jong-Il Has Pancreatic Cancer

Honestly (and all perfunctory “wouldn’t wish it on anybody” statements aside), I don’t know if the presumably imminent departure of Kim Jong-Il (the five-year survival rate of people with pancreatic cancer is a mere 4%) and the rise of his son, Kim Jong Un (whom Kim Jong-Il named as his successor last month — which is no secret to anyone but the North Korean people, who apparently haven’t yet been told) is a good thing, or a bad thing.

What I do remember are the warnings we heard when Kim Il-Sung, Kim Jong-Il’s father, was dying, and Kim Jong-Il was poised to assume power — which can be boiled down to: “If you think the father is crazy, wait ’til you get a load of the son.”

What do we know about Kim Jong Un, and what can we expect — or fear?

Read more »»»

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Asia, Barack Obama, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush, Guantanamo Bay, Iraq, Latin America, PNAC & PNACers


June 23, 2009

Two Giants Call Out Obama: Helen Thomas and Bob Herbert

There is a very small cadre of mainstream journalists who have more than earned the highest level of respect and deserve the undivided attention of every American who cares about truth over spin, and substance over style. They’ll never lie to you, or tell you what they think you want to hear. (I said it was a very small cadre.) Paul Krugman is one. Molly Ivins was another.

Two of this exclusive group, writing about two separate issues, ask the same essential question about Barack Obama: Why such unwillingness — or cowardice — to do the job the people hired him to do: reverse the offenses of his predecessor, and work for the best interests of the American people?

When Helen Thomas and Bob Herbert speak, I listen. If only Obama would too:

Read more »»»

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Afghanistan, Barack Obama, Civil Rights, George W. Bush, Guantanamo Bay, Health & Wellness, Homeland Insecurity, Insurance, Iraq


January 12, 2009

Leading Rights Groups Urge Obama to Stop Guantánamo Proceedings Against Child Soldiers

Remember the child detainees of Gitmo? No? Well, it has been a while — long enough for these boys to grow into adults while awaiting trial (any trial, even the kangarro court otherwise known as a “secret military tribunal”). Here’s our coverage of the child detainees when we first leaned about them… nearly six years ago:

If This Doesn’t Outrage You, You’re Not Human
April 24, 2003

Children held at Camp Xray, US admits

And think about this: If there is even one child under the age of 16 now, it means he was captured, transported to Cuba, and has been rotting in a cage at Gitmo for nearly a year and a half — or since he was between 13 and 14 years old. …

 

AI Weighs in on Gitmo Children
April 24, 2003

Most of the 600-plus detainees in Guantanamo are confined to tiny cells for virtually 24 hours a day and reportedly allowed to exercise in shackles for only 15 minutes twice a week…

 

Gitmo Update: Rummy, Myers Dis Concerns
for Child Welfare

April 27, 2003

A senior United Nations envoy has called on the United States to take prompt action over the fate of three teenage boys being held with other terror suspects in its prison camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. …

US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has defended the detention of the boys — aged between 13 and 15 — at Camp Delta, saying they are “enemy combatants”, captured while fighting for the Taleban or al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. …

One of the youths has been identified by Canadian media reports as a Canadian citizen wanted by the US over a grenade attack in Afghanistan which killed a US soldier. …

Which brings us to a long-awaited update about that very Canadian, Omar Khadr:

Leading Rights Groups Urge Obama to Stop Guantánamo Proceedings Against Child Soldiers

WASHINGTON, D.C. — January 12, 2009 — Five leading human rights and civil liberties groups sent a letter to President-elect Barack Obama today, urging him to suspend the Guantánamo Bay military commissions and to ensure that the upcoming trial of Omar Khadr, a 22-year-old Canadian, does not proceed. The trial is scheduled to begin on January 26, six days after the presidential inauguration.

Khadr is slated to be tried before the widely discredited military commissions for war crimes he is alleged to have committed when he was 15. There is broad global recognition that the recruitment and use of children in armed conflict is a serious abuse in itself. This is reflected in the fact that no existing international tribunal has ever prosecuted a child for war crimes.

The groups — the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International, the Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, Human Rights First and Human Rights Watch — urged Obama to drop the military commission charges against Khadr and either repatriate him to Canada or, if there is evidence to support it, to prosecute him in U.S. federal courts in accordance with international juvenile justice and fair trial standards.

The groups also called on Obama to immediately suspend pending proceedings against Mohammed Jawad, an Afghan who is also charged before the military commissions for crimes allegedly committed when he was 16 or 17. A military judge twice ruled that statements Jawad made following his arrest were not admissible at trial because they were obtained through torture. However, the government has challenged the ruling and the Court of Military Commission Review in Washington, D.C., is scheduled to hear arguments on Tuesday, January 13.

The letter from the groups to President-elect Barack Obama is below and can also be found online at: www.aclu.org/safefree/detention/…

More information on the ACLU’s work to close Guantánamo can be found online at: www.aclu.org



January 12, 2009

President-elect Barack Obama
Obama-Biden Transition Project
Washington, DC 20720

Dear President-elect Obama:

We write to you regarding Omar Khadr, the 22-year-old Canadian national slated to be tried by military commission at Guantánamo for crimes allegedly committed when he was aged 15. If the trial, now scheduled for January 26, 2009, is allowed to go forward, Omar Khadr will become the first person in recent years to be tried by any western nation for war crimes allegedly committed as a child.

We urge that upon taking office, you act quickly to suspend the military commissions, drop the military commission charges against Khadr, and either repatriate him for rehabilitation in Canada or transfer him to federal court and prosecute him in accordance with international juvenile justice and fair trial standards.

Background

United States forces captured Khadr on July 27, 2002, after a firefight in Afghanistan that resulted in the death of US Army Sergeant First Class Christopher Speer, as well as injuries to other soldiers. Khadr, who was seriously wounded, was initially detained at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. There, according to his lawyers, he was forced into painful stress positions, threatened with rape, and hooded and confronted with barking dogs.

In October 2002, US officers transported Khadr to Guantánamo, where the abusive interrogations continued, and where he has been ever since. Khadr told his lawyers that his interrogators shackled him in painful positions, threatened to send him to Egypt, Syria, or Jordan for torture, and used him as a “human mop” after he urinated on the floor during one interrogation session. He was not allowed to meet with a lawyer until November 2004, more than two years after he was first captured.

During his third year of detention, Khadr was charged with murder and other related crimes under the first set of military commissions authorized by President Bush. Those charges were dismissed when the Supreme Court ruled the commissions unlawful in the case of Hamdan v. Rumsfeld. In 2007, under newly authorized commissions, the United States government charged him with murder, attempted murder in violation of the laws of war, conspiracy, providing material support for terrorism, and spying. He faces a possible life prison sentence.

Violations of Human Rights and Juvenile Justice Standards

Khadr’s prolonged detention in Guantánamo Bay contravenes the United States’ binding legal obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and international juvenile justice standards. Although these international standards allow for detention of juveniles only as a last resort and require prompt determination of juvenile cases, Khadr was detained for more than two years before being provided access to an attorney, and for more than three years before being charged before the first military commission. After more than six years the lawfulness of this detention still has not been judicially reviewed on the merits.

Further, despite international standards requiring treatment of children in accordance with their age, as well as segregation of children and adults, Khadr has been housed with adult detainees, even when other child detainees were being housed together in Guantánamo’s Camp Iguana. The abusive interrogations and prolonged detention in solitary confinement violated both international juvenile justice standards and general humane treatment standards, including Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, and other binding prohibitions against torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment.

Failure to Comply with Obligations under the Optional Protocol

International law requires the United States to recognize the special situation of children who have been recruited or used in armed conflict. The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (”Optional Protocol”), which the United States ratified in 2002, explicitly prohibits the recruitment or use of children under the age of 18 in armed conflict by non-state armed groups and requires state parties to criminalize such conduct. It also requires the rehabilitation of former child soldiers within a signatory’s jurisdiction, including “all appropriate assistance for their physical and psychological recovery and their social reintegration.”

Yet in its dealings with Khadr, the US government has ignored its legal obligations under the Optional Protocol. For years, Khadr was denied access to education, vocational training, counseling, or any family contact. Instead, he was held in isolation and abused.

Last May, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, which oversees compliance with the Optional Protocol, criticized the United States’ treatment and military prosecutions of children held at Guantánamo, and called on the US government to treat children in its custody in accordance with international juvenile justice standards.

Military Trial Moving Ahead

Despite widespread criticism of the military commission system and its treatment of Omar Khadr, the outgoing Bush administration has continued to move his case toward trial. Motions hearings are now set for January 19, with a trial date scheduled for January 26. Unless you act quickly to suspend the commissions, Khadr will become the first person in recent history to be prosecuted for war crimes allegedly committed as a child, before a system that you have consistently criticized as “flawed.”

As you are aware, you voted against the legislation passed by Congress in October 2006 to authorize the commissions, calling it a “betrayal of American values.” When charges against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the 9/11 co-conspirators were announced in February 2008, you criticized that decision on the grounds that “[t]hese trials are too important to be held in a flawed military commission system” and that the men should be tried in federal court or by courts-martial, in order to “demonstrate our commitment to the rule of law.” Just five months ago, after the conviction of Salim Hamdan, you reiterated your criticism of the commission process, stating it is “time to better protect the American people and our values by bringing swift and sure justice to terrorists through our courts and our Uniform Code of Military Justice.”

You have also co-sponsored legislation (the Child Soldier Prevention Act, S. 1175, which was subsequently incorporated into the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, and the Child Soldier Accountability Act, S. 2135) designed to help end the use of child soldiers. These measures, both signed into law in 2008, commit the US government to expand services to rehabilitate child soldiers and reintegrate them back into their communities, and allow the United States to prosecute the individuals responsible for the recruitment of children as soldiers.

Now is the chance to ensure America’s commitment to the rule of law by putting an immediate halt to Omar Khadr’s trial. If there is evidence that Khadr committed a federal crime, he should be transferred to a federal court and prosecuted in accordance with international juvenile justice and fair trial standards; if not, he should be repatriated for rehabilitation and integration.

This is also the course you should take with the other known juvenile detainee, Mohammed Jawad, an Afghan, who has been in Guantánamo for six years, reportedly subjected to torture, sleep deprivation, and other abuse, and charged with attempted murder by the military commission for acts allegedly committed when he was either 16 or 17 years old. No trial date is currently set in his case.

We hope that you will act quickly on this matter in the interest of justice, protection of human rights, and the rule of law.

Sincerely,

American Civil Liberties Union
Amnesty International
Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers
Human Rights First
Human Rights Watch

cc:
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates
Eric Holder

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Afghanistan, Barack Obama, Canada, Civil Rights, Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush, Guantanamo Bay, Homeland Insecurity, Press Releases, Youth


May 25, 2003

Dear Iraqis…

Greetings from America!

How are things? Oops, sorry — I guess that was a pretty insensitive question. Things suck, don’t they?

I hear Uncle Sam’s been fudging the number of civilians slaughtered by coalition troops — not, of course, that this comes as news to you or me; I’ve been tortured sick since Day One of Georgie Boy’s “war” by the few reports that did manage to trickle out — but I did want to let you know that at least now the truth is finally beginning to come out in American news sources:

Evidence is mounting to suggest that between 5,000 and 10,000 Iraqi civilians may have died during the recent war, according to researchers involved in independent surveys of the country. …

Such a range would make the Iraq war the deadliest campaign for noncombatants that US forces have fought since Vietnam. …

By one measure of violence against noncombatants, as compared with resistance faced by soldiers, the war in Iraq was particularly brutal. In Operation Just Cause, the 1989 US invasion of Panama, 13 Panamanian civilians died for every US military fatality. If 5,000 Iraqi civilians died in the latest war, that proportion would be 33 to 1. …

The US Department of Defense has refused to give any sort of estimate on deaths. …

Surveys pointing to high civilian death toll in Iraq
Christian Science Monitor
May 22, 2003

(Hey, now, don’t let the “Christian” in “Christian Science Monitor” turn you off — it’s a damned darned good source of information.)

I also hear that those of you left alive and in captivity by the U.S. are being treated as badly as — if not worse than — the Gitmo prisoners (if that’s even possible, in light of the news that the U.S. “has floated plans to turn Guantanamo Bay into a death camp, with its own death row and execution chamber”):

The United States is illegally holding thousands of Iraqi prisoners of war and other captives without access to human rights officials at compounds close to Baghdad airport, The Observer has learnt.

There have also been reports of a mutiny last week by prisoners at an airport compound, in protest against conditions. The uprising was ‘dealt with’ by the Americans, according to a US military source.

The International Committee of the Red Cross so far has been denied access to what the organisation believes could be as many as 3,000 prisoners held in searing heat. All other requests to inspect conditions under which prisoners are being held have been met with silence or been turned down.

There is circumstantial evidence that prisoners are being gagged and hooded, in the manner of the Afghans and other captives held at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba — treatment in itself questionable under international law. …

Red Cross denied access to PoWs
The Observer
May 25, 2003

My God, I’m sorry. I’m especially sorry there’s not a damned thing I can do about it. I’ll just keep bringing such atrocities to light here, in the hopes of awakening a few sleepyheads among the nearly 288 million Americans happily encased in their big, collective coma.

That’s all I can do.

Now, listen, Iraqis, I know the last you need is any more bad news, but frankly, I’m concerned about your health. No, no, I’m not being facetious — I mean, if you’ve read along this far, it means you’re still alive, and have at least one working eye (unless you’ve been blinded in a bomb blast, and somebody has to read this to you). In any case, aside from the possibility that you’re starving to death, missing a limb or two, and in danger of getting your ass shot off in the streets of Baghdad tonight, I’m worried about your longterm health prospects.

You see, there’s a whole lot of depleted uranium (DU) lying around your neighborhood right now. DU is, simply, “a very dense metal fashioned from low-level radioactive waste, allows [conventional munitions] to easily pierce armor and buildings that would deflect other projectiles.”

Yeah, well, the problem is, that “low-level radioactive waste” has pierced more than a few human bodies, too, and some of you folks are walking around (or lying in your hospital beds) with radioactive shrapnel in your bellies.

The really scary thing, though, is that you didn’t have to take a hit from U.S. fire to be affected by DU. The U.S. government plays down the dangers of exposure to DU, but — come on — is there a single Pentagon official who’d be willing to have the stuff lying around his backyard in order to prove there’s no risk?

Go talk to the widows of the tens of thousands of Gulf War I veterans who died after returning home from Kuwait — or talk to those who lived long enough to sire babies with “severe deformities, including missing eyes, blood infections, respiratory problems, and fused fingers.” (Just what do you think “Gulf War Syndrome” is, anyway?) Or go talk to the Afghans who show “‘astonishing’ levels of uranium in their urine.”

You can speculate all you like about what the longterm health hazards of DU exposure might be, or — like the terminally corrupt American media and the idiots who lap it up — you can swallow the official propaganda and blow off the idea that all those tons of DU we left lying around Kuwait and Iraq in ‘91 are dangerous.

So, dear Iraqis, if your local hospital hasn’t been bombed out of existence, ransacked, or filled beyond capacity already, I urge you to go get tested as soon as poss—

Wait, what am I saying? You’re just trying to stay alive at this point, aren’t you?

Damn, sorry. I forgot that for a second. That’s too easy to do in the comfort of my nice, big, American house, with a PBS special on Mexican music providing pleasant white noise in the background, as I kick back with my keyboard on my lap, and wonder idly what I’m going to make for dinner tonight.

See, Iraqis, that’s the problem with us Americans: We’re too fat and sleepy and ignorant to realize you don’t have a lot of choice in anything anymore. Betcha never thought this was what “liberation” and “democracy” were all about, didja?

I apologize. I’ll do better. I can’t promise my fellow countrymen will do better, but I’ll try. Really I will.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Afghanistan, Chemical Weapons/DU, Civil Rights, George W. Bush, Guantanamo Bay, Health & Wellness, Iraq


April 27, 2003

Gitmo Update: Rummy, Myers Dis Concerns for Child Welfare

A senior United Nations envoy has called on the United States to take prompt action over the fate of three teenage boys being held with other terror suspects in its prison camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Olara Otunnu, the special representative for the rights of children in war, told BBC News that the UN expected America to fulfil its obligations under international law.

US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has defended the detention of the boys — aged between 13 and 15 — at Camp Delta, saying they are “enemy combatants”, captured while fighting for the Taleban or al-Qaeda in Afghanistan.

General Richard Myers, chairman of the US military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the boys were being held “for a very good reason — for our safety”.

“They may be juveniles — but they’re not on a Little League team anywhere,” he said at a news conference along with Mr Rumsfeld at the Pentagon on Friday.

“They’re on a major league team, and it’s a terrorist team. Some have killed. Some have stated they’re going to kill again.” …

If the teenagers were found to have been fighting as child soldiers, Mr Otunnu said, they should be demobilised, reintegrated and rehabilitated. …

“We do not sentence children to jail. We do not punish them. We give them healing and get them rehabilitated.”

One of the youths has been identified by Canadian media reports as a Canadian citizen wanted by the US over a grenade attack in Afghanistan which killed a US soldier. …

That the US sees nothing wrong with holding children at Guantanamo and interrogating them is a shocking indicator of how cavalier the Bush administration has become about respecting human rights,” [Amnesty International] spokesman Alistair Hodgett told the Associated Press news agency.

US challenged over boy prisoners
BBC News
April 26, 2003

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Afghanistan, Donald Rumsfeld, Guantanamo Bay, Youth


April 24, 2003

AI Weighs in on Gitmo Children

Children Detained at Guantanamo Should Be Released, Says Amnesty International

Amnesty International today called for the immediate release of the children in detention at Camp Delta in Guantanamo Bay. If the US military will not release the children, then they should be charged with a recognizable offense, provided with full judicial safeguards applying to youthful offenders, and transferred to a suitable juvenile detention facility, the organization stated. …

Most of the 600-plus detainees in Guantanamo are confined to tiny cells for virtually 24 hours a day and reportedly allowed to exercise in shackles for only 15 minutes twice a week — conditions which in their totality Amnesty International believes can amount to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. These conditions are of concern for all detainees, but are particularly shocking when applied in the case of juveniles — some of whom may have been held there for many months, with no end in sight.

Even if the children are held in a less restrictive section of the facility, the general conditions of their detention, coupled with the denial of access to courts, families or lawyers, is in serious breach of the special protections that should be afforded to juvenile detainees. Amnesty International is particularly disturbed by reports about the interrogation of the children. …

The United States last year ratified the treaty on the involvement of children in armed conflict, which reaffirms that “the rights of children require special protection” …

Amnesty USA
April 23, 2003

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Cuba, Guantanamo Bay, Youth


If This Doesn’t Outrage You, You’re Not Human

You’re not going to believe this. I’m reeling in shock — although, frankly, I’m surprised anything could shock me anymore.

Children held at Camp Xray, US admits

The US military has revealed it is holding juveniles at its high-security prison for terrorists at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, known as Camp Xray.

The commander of the joint task force at Guantanamo, Major General Geoffrey Miller, says more than one child under the age of 16 is at the detention centre.

However, Maj Gen Miller has revealed little more about their welfare.

Maj Gen Miller says the US is holding “juvenile enemy combatants” at the centre, confirming rumours of children being held.

He has refused to reveal how many there are, their exact ages or their countries of origin. …

The children are still being interrogated and will continue to be held at Guantanamo. …

ABC (Australia)
April 22, 2003

And think about this: If there is even one child under the age of 16 now, it means he was captured, transported to Cuba, and has been rotting in a cage at Gitmo for nearly a year and a half — or since he was between 13 and 14 years old.

I am so angry right now, I can’t even write. I’m sure it’s best I don’t even try.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Cuba, Guantanamo Bay, Youth


 

 
The newest and sexiest books are just a click away.
 

Latest Comments to
The Lavender Newswire
and
The Gaytheist Agenda


 

 

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 1075 access attempts in the last 7 days.