January 8, 2009

ProtectMarriage.com Files Suit to Hide Identities of Campaign Donors

H/T to both H.R. and Chino!

There’s nothing I can say that Justin McLachlan doesn’t say better — although I’ll add, as I always do: The Anti-Gays can’t have it both ways — and if they don’t want anyone to know what flaming bigots they are, the soltuion is simple: Stop funding the hate movement.

Protectmarriage.com sues to hide
its campaign donor records

The ballot measure committee Protectmarriage.com and the National Organization for Marriage California have asked a federal court to force California to remove campaign donor records from public view (expunge them completely, actually).

They want the court to declare that the state’s campaign disclosure law — insomuch as it makes them file reports after the election is over and allows/requires those reports be publicly available after the election — violates the First Amendment.

They’ve also asked the court to prevent the state from requiring them to file upcoming reports, due on Jan. 31, that they say will reveal the names of previously undisclosed campaign donors and they want protection from filing reports that reveal the names of their treasurer and campaign officers, like registration documents.

The groups said in their complaint that “there is a reasonable probability that the Act’s compelled disclosure requirements will result in threats, harassment, and reprisals, similar to those already suffered by supporters of Proposition 8.” …

BTW, Protectmarriage.com is the same group that used public campaign disclosure records to threaten a San Diego business that donated to the “No on prop. 8″ before the campaign.

Which was only part of a larger blackmail scheme by Protectmarriage.com, attempting to extort money out of No On 8 contributors, lest they be painted as “in opposition to traditional marriage.”

More from Justin at the link, including the full complaint filed by the Alliance Defense Fund.

Here is today’s press release from the ADF itself — which would be laughable if these gay-haters weren’t resorting to the same old tired fearmongering-and-smear tactics:

ADF attorneys file suit to stop harassment of Calif. marriage amendment supporters

ProtectMarriage.com suit challenges campaign finance law’s requirement to publicly disclose identity and employer of donors giving as little as $100

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Alliance Defense Fund allied attorneys together with ADF attorneys filed a lawsuit Wednesday on behalf of ProtectMarriage.com and the National Center for Marriage California to prevent harassment of citizens who gave as little as $100 to support Proposition 8. The lawsuit documents incidents of harassment and retaliation by opponents who have targeted Proposition 8 supporters after their identities and employers were made public by the state as required by California campaign finance law.

“Putting the names and employers of the people who supported Proposition 8 on the Internet for anyone to see has caused serious problems. No one should worry about getting a death threat because of the way he or she votes,” said James Bopp, Jr., lead attorney for the supporters of Proposition 8. “This lawsuit will protect the right of all people to help support causes they agree with, without having to worry about harassment or threats.”

In November, over 7 million Californians approved Proposition 8. Under a California law, people who gave money to support Proposition 8 had their names, employers, and other personal information listed on the Web site of the Secretary of State of California.

After Proposition 8 passed, people who did not support Proposition 8 used the list of names to go after people who supported Proposition 8. Some people who supported Proposition 8 had their homes and churches vandalized, were forced to resign their jobs, and were even threatened with violence and death. To stop this harassment and these threats, this lawsuit asks the court to stop the release of the names and personal information of people who gave money to support Proposition 8.

“Our laws should ensure free participation in the democratic process, and not result in compromising the free speech and association rights of guaranteed to all Americans,” said ADF Legal Counsel Tim Chandler, who is serving as local counsel in the case. “Citizens shouldn’t have to choose between being involved in the democratic process and subjecting themselves to acts of vengeance.”

The lawsuit challenges parts of California’s campaign finance laws that require people who donate as little as $100 to have personal information revealed on the Internet as unconstitutional violations of free speech. The lawsuit also challenges parts of the campaign finance laws that require reporting of donations after a proposition has been voted on as unconstitutional.

A copy of the complaint filed with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division, in the lawsuit ProtectMarriage.com v. Bowen is available at www.telladf.org/UserDocs/ProtectMarriageComplaint.pdf.

ADF is a legal alliance of Christian attorneys and like-minded organizations defending the right of people to freely live out their faith. Launched in 1994, ADF employs a unique combination of strategy, training, funding, and litigation to protect and preserve religious liberty, the sanctity of life, marriage, and the family.