September 30, 2008

If Prayer Worked, We Would Have Prayed Away Sarah Palin A Long Time Ago

She only grows more ignorant, hateful and utterly revolting by the minute:

The governor told us though she’s not a member of any church, she visits a couple of them regularly when she’s home. She took issue with news reports that one of them, The Wasilla Bible Church, sponsored a conference where gays could be made straight through prayer.
 
Palin: Well, it matters though, Katie, when the media gets it wrong. It frustrates Americans who are just trying to get the facts and … be able to make up their mind on, about a person’s values. So it does matter.

But what you’re talking about, I think, value here, what my position is on homosexuality and you can pray it away, because I think that was the title that was listed on that bulletin. And you know, I don’t know what prayers are worthy of being prayed. I don’t know what’s prayers are going to be asked and answered. But as for homosexuality, I am not going to judge Americans and the decisions that they make in their adult personal relationships. I have one of my absolute best friends for the last 30 years happens to be gay, and I love her dearly. And she is not my “gay friend,” she is one of my best friends, who happens to have made a choice that isn’t a choice that I have made. But I am not going to judge people.

You know, George W. Bush is sounding like the paragon of tolerance — and intelligence — compared to this stupid she-thug.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: "Ex-Gays", Election 2004, Hate Speech, Homophobia, Radical Religious Right, Random Stupidity, Republicans, Sarah Palin






Language to avoid at all costs: “Ban same-sex marriage.”

For your perusal, talking points (aimed at a federal ban on marriage equality) from the National Organization for Marriage (the anti-gay cell led by professional gay basher Maggie Gallagher, who was busted for taking money to promote the Bush administration marriage program through her syndicated UPI column):

MARRIAGE AND THE FMA:
Answering the Toughest Questions

F’rinstance:

Language to avoid at all costs: “Ban same-sex marriage.” Our base loves this wording. So do supporters of SSM. They know it causes us to lose about ten percentage points in polls. Don’t use it. Say we’re against “redefining marriage” or in favor or “marriage as the union of husband and wife” NEVER “banning same-sex marriage.”

The first line is the biggest crack-up:

Extensive and repeated polling agrees that the single most effective message is:

“Gays and Lesbians have a right to live as they choose, they don’t have the right to redefine marriage for all of us.”

We say: Oppressive old busybodies who can’t keep their own marriages intact have the right to live as they choose — but they don’t have the right to redefine marriage for all of us.

As usual, it’s just another crapfest from Gallagher and her Bigot Brigade — but worth reading, as even their “best” arguments are as weak as a sick kitten.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: Homophobia, Marriage, Radical Religious Right






One Man’s Reaction to Anti-Gay Propaganda

Lance Christian Johnson:

I’ve got gay marriage on my mind again. Why? Well, you know, now that it’s legal in California, I’m looking to end my marriage with my wife so I can marry a dude. That’s what it’s all about, right?

Nah, it’s not that. …

What got me thinking about this issue is that I heard the first ad (I was in the other room from the television) urging voters to vote yes on Proposition 8 - the proposition that would amend the state constitution to outlaw gay marriage. In all honesty, it made my stomach turn and left me with a rather morose feeling that dragged on for the rest of the day.

I was going to post a couple of video clips on this blog so I could compare and contrast the rhetoric of the anti-gay marriage crowd with the pro-gay marriage crowd. The problem was, when I watched some of the anti-gay videos, I just started to feel depressed. I’m so sick of these people and their specious arguments. Stop talking about “protecting” marriage. Stop talking about “values.” Shoot, one video I saw showed Newt Gingrich comparing the “Yes on 8″ cause to the cause of the American Revolutionaries. I had to stop, as I feared that such a concentrated dose of hatred and stupidity would melt my brain if I continued to watch it. Good thing he didn’t say “judicial tyranny” ’cause that makes me want to vomit fire.

The thing is, I’m really starting to hate these people. I honestly don’t think that hate is a useful emotion, and I realize that it does more harm to me than it does to them, but I can’t help but feel this way. This whole thing is so colossaly unfair. It’s not just unfair, but the arguments of those who are against same-sex marriage are so completely illogical. The combination of ignorance, hatred and irrationality is too much for me. Basically, I need to stop thinking about it, as I tend to dwell on things that depress me - and these people depress me. …

No, Lance, don’t stop thinking about it.

Lance, the smartest thing I ever heard about depression was this: Depression is anger turned inward.

The cure: Turn it outward. Direct it at the source.

The hate is easy to understand — the gay-bashers are doing everything within their power to incite hate. But allowing them to make you feel depressed and hopeless is exactly what they want.

Don’t let them do that to you.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: California, Hate Speech, Homophobia, Marriage, Proposition 8, Radical Religious Right






New York Times Takes Clear, Strong Stand Against Prop 8 (and Prop 102 and Amdt 2)

Just beautiful — and well worth the click and full read:

Preserving California’s Constitution

California voters will have a chance in November to protect the rights of gay men and women, and to preserve the state’s Constitution. They should vote against Proposition 8, which seeks to amend that Constitution to prevent people of the same sex from marrying. …

Opponents of giving gay couples the protections, dignity and respect that come with marriage are working furiously to try to overturn the court ruling through Proposition 8. It is our fervent hope that Californians will reject this mean-spirited attempt to embed second-class treatment of one group of citizens in the State Constitution. …

The proponents of Proposition 8 make the familiar claim that legalizing same-sex marriage undercuts marriage between men and women. But thousands of gay and lesbian couples have been married in California since the May ruling and marriage remains intact.

Similar discriminatory measures are on the ballot in Arizona and Florida. They also should be rejected.

Thank you, NYT!

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: Arizona, California, Florida, Marriage, Media, Proposition 8






CAH’s First Ad Takes Aim at A1 Storage Caster Family’s $293,000 to Prop 8

Takeoff on Lyndon Johnson Daisy Spot – 1964

LOS ANGELES — September 29 — On the same day that the Yes on Proposition 8 campaign released its first commercial, the independent Californians Against Hate posted its first commercial.

On its web site:
http://californiansagainsthate.com/

On YouSendIt:
https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php…

On YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl3e–c2L5o

This groundbreaking spot depicts San Diego mega-donor Terry Caster. Caster and many of his eight sons and daughters and their spouses have given a combined total of $293,000.00 to the Protect Marriage / Yes on Proposition 8 campaign between January and July of 2008. Caster owns A-1 Self Storage Company of San Diego. A-1 Self Storage has 40 locations throughout California with over 4 million square feet of storage.

Caster has been the focus of a “Call Terry Caster Campaign” for the past two months, which has generated so many calls to his office that he had to put in a separate phone line to field them all.

The commercial features one of his 38 grandchildren, portrayed by four-year-old Madison of Los Angeles, asking her grandfather, “Why did you give so much money away, Grandpa?” The innocence of the little girl is in stark contrast to the mega-contributions of Caster and his family. The spot opens with Madison plucking the pedals off a daisy, just like the little girl did in what is arguably the most famous political ad in American history, Daisy Girl 1964. That commercial ran only once, but it became the centerpiece of President Johnson’s landslide victory over then U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater.

Fred Karger, Campaign Manager of Californians Against Hate said with the release of their first commercial, “We want to remind people exactly who is giving vast sums of money to try to take away marriage equality here in California. We will have at least one more commercial featuring another mega-donor that will be coming out soon.”

The commercial was produced, filmed and directed by noted filmmaker and documentarian, John Keitel and his Shelter Productions.

Television stations and other media outlets can download a high-resolution, broadcast-quality version of the 43-second Daisy Girl 2008 commercial:

https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php…

Records of major contributors to the Yes on Proposition 8 campaign, including Terry Caster and his family’s contributions, can be found on the “Dishonor Roll” on the Californians Against Hate web site:

http://www.californiansagainsthate.com/

Here is a summary of the Caster Family donations thus far:

Terry Caster & Family
A-1 Self Storage
4607 Mission Gorge Place, San Diego, CA 92120
Tel: 800.219.4854

www.a1storage.com
www.castergrp.com
www.servinghands.com

$293,000

Terry Caster - $172,500

Barbara Caster - $9,100

Brian Caster - $29,100

Candice Caster - $9,100

Cha Cha Caster - $9,100

Christina Caster - $9,100

Craig Caster - $9,100

Gary Davidson - $9,100

Justin Caster - $9,100

Kenneth Kremensky - $9,100

Mechele Kremensky - $9,100

Nick Caster - $9,100

The Caster Family owns A-1 Self Storage, with 40 locations throughout California. Terry Caster is quoted in the San Diego Union Tribune as saying “without solid marriage you are going to have a sick society.” Son Craig Caster is the Founder/Pastor of Family Discipleship Ministries in San Diego. The Caster family has donated more to Proposition 8 than any other family in San Diego.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: California, Homophobia, Marriage, Press Releases, Proposition 8






September 29, 2008

Dow: Wow.

Front page of Yahoo! Finance:

Dow Jones 777 down, September 29, 2008

 
1929, meet September 29th.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: Business/Economy






Supreme (Court) Hypocrisy: Alliance Defense Fund’s “Pulpit Freedom Sunday”

Somebody explain something to me.

How come when gay people challenge the law by filing suit against the state, and the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, the result is “overturning the will of the people” by “activist judges” who “legislate from the bench” …

…yet when the same people who level such charges challenge the law by breaking the law, and provoking the government to enforce the law as an excuse to file suit against the state, they’re making “a bold defense of the First Amendment’s Establishment, Free Exercise, and Free Speech clauses”?

Maybe somebody at the Alliance Defense Fund can explain the difference to me, what with them bein’ such real smart, book-learned lawyer types and all.

While we wait for an answer (don’t hold your breath), let’s review yesterday’s attempt to overturn the will of the people through legislation from the bench…

Backstory: Alliance Defense Fund Proceeds With Lawsuit-Baiting Ploy; AU Vows to Report Violators to IRS, September 24, 2008

First, today’s press release from Americans United:

Americans United Urges IRS To Take Action Against Six Churches That Joined Pulpit-Politicking Scheme

Church-State Watchdog Group Criticizes Religious Right Lawyers For Luring Congregations Into Intentional Violation Of Federal Tax Law

Americans United for Separation of Church and State today filed complaints with the Internal Revenue Service about six churches whose pastors endorsed candidates from the pulpit during a mass defiance of federal tax law last Sunday.

The Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), a Religious Right legal group in Scottsdale, Ariz., urged pastors to defy federal tax law by endorsing or opposing candidates during a so-called “Pulpit Freedom Sunday” Sept. 28. Under the IRS Code, churches and other 501(c)(3) tax-exempt groups may not intervene in elections.

“These pastors flagrantly violated the law and now must deal with the consequences,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United.

Continued Lynn, “This is one of the most appalling Religious Right gambits I’ve ever seen. Church leaders are supposed to tend to Americans’ spiritual needs, not behave like partisan political hacks. I urge the IRS to act swiftly in these cases.”

Lynn also scored the ministers who took part in the ADF gambit.

“A pastor who knowingly violates federal tax law is setting a poor example for his or her congregation,” Lynn said. “Every pastor who took part in this stunt ought to be ashamed.”

The ADF overture has been roundly criticized. Many pastors refused to take part, arguing that America’s pulpits should not be politicized. In addition, three former IRS officials have filed a complaint asserting that the ADF has violated ethics standards governing tax attorneys by urging clients to violate the law.

The six churches reported to the IRS by Americans United today are:

Bethlehem Baptist Church, Bethlehem, Ga.: According to press accounts, Pastor Jody Hice “urged his congregation to vote for Sen. John McCain and to not vote for Sen. Barack Obama.”

Fairview Baptist Church, Fairview, Okla.: The Associated Press reported that Pastor Paul Blair “says he told his congregation that as a Christian and as an American citizen, he would be voting for John McCain.”

Warroad Community Church, Warroad, Minn.: Pastor Gus Booth told his congregation, “We need to vote for the most righteous of candidates. And it doesn’t take a brain surgeon to figure that out. The most righteous is John McCain.”

Calvary Chapel, Philadelphia, Pa.: The Rev. Francis Pultro told the congregation, “As Christians it’s clear we should vote for John McCain. He is the only candidate I believe a Christian can vote for.”

First Southern Baptist Church, Buena Park, Calif.: The Rev. Wiley Drake said, “I am angry because the government and the IRS and some Christians have taken away the rights of pastors. I have a right to endorse anybody I doggone well please. And if they don’t like that, too bad… According to my Bible and in my opinion, there is no way in the world a Christian can vote for Barack Hussein Obama. Mr. Obama is not standing up for anything that is tradition in America.”

New Life Church, West Bend, Wisc.: Speaking from the pulpit, Pastor Luke Emrich said, “I’m telling you straight up I would choose life. I would cast a vote for John McCain and Sarah Palin.”

Said AU’s Lynn, “When five of the six pastors choose to endorse John McCain, it’s hard not to see the ADF scheme as partisan in character.”

In complaint letters filed with the IRS, Americans United urged swift investigations of the churches and appropriate penalties.

Next, a few choice reactions:

Jay Bookman, Atlanta Journal-Constitution:

[“Pulpit Freedom Sunday”] was organized by the conservative Alliance Defense Fund, which sees the IRS rules as an infringement on the First Amendment freedoms of religion and speech.

The rules are neither. Hice and other ministers have every right to preach politics from their pulpits. Nothing government does can or will stop them. However, they simply cannot endorse candidates AND maintain their tax-exempt status. That status is a special benefit conferred by government, and government has every right to set conditions on receipt of that benefit.

Furthermore, the IRS rules in question apply not just to churches but to a wide array of tax-exempt non-profit groups that perform religious, educational or charitable functions. Donations to such groups are tax-deductible; donations to political groups and candidates are not.

It is perfectly reasonable and fair for the IRS to enact rules to protect that distinction.

Religion scholar Martin E. Marty, Dallas Morning News:

Is this a real “pulpit freedom” issue? Some want to compare it to Martin Luther King and conscientious objectors and any who appeal to a “higher law.” But King and the objectors know that they are vulnerable to arrest or penalties, and have often paid them by sitting in jails. The Pulpit Freedom advocates appeal to no “higher law;” they simply want the freedom to break existing laws. They may serve some purpose by forcing more definition from IRS and church leadership, but most immediate purposes are to be straight-out political and to have the citizenry at large pay, indirectly, to subsidize their messages.

Waco Tribune-Herald:

A charade is being played … and a grandstand play. …

This is a fest for a few who are a little too full of political zeal. …

Of course, pastors can express political opinions. But they can’t use their institutions as political machines and expect them to be treated as tax-exempt.

Comment, Newsweek:

I always find it odd that so many conservative Christians don’t see the conflict between conservative politics and Biblical message. …

In the Gospels, we never find Christ trying to manipulate the state power of the Romans or influence its leaders, but instead He spoke to the hearts of the people, telling them that it was up to them to seek a change of heart and find their way to God. …

The strength of our faith comes from a choice we make after searching our hearts and seeking to draw closer to Christ. Wagging our fingers at the behavior of others and trying to pass laws to prevent them from behaving a certain way is Old Testament legalism, and Christ condemned the Pharisees pretty harshly for similar behavior.

Finally, it looks like the ADF is going to have a hard time arguing that pulpit politicking is okey-dokey with the American people; a Los Angeles Times poll which asks, “Should pastors be allowed to deliver political sermons and endorse presidential candidates?” is currently showing 81.4% say NO.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: Alliance Defense Fund, Church-State Separation, John McCain, Press Releases, Radical Religious Right, Religion & Spirituality, Republicans, United States






Prop 8 Crusaders Haul Out One of Their Biggest Lies in First Attack Ad

I haven’t watched the ad yet — Firefox hangs on videos when one has dozens of tabs open — but per the No On 8 camp (the good guys), the first anti-marriage ad by the Yes On 8 camp (the bad guys) includes the big (and I mean Radio-City-Music-Hall-big) lie that “school children will be taught about same-sex marriage unless Prop 8 passes.”

Frankly — or rather, Frank-Schubert-ly — I’m surprised the rabid radicals would resort to one of the most easily debunked lies in their arsenal of propaganda — especially after (by many accounts, none of which I have handy to link to at the moment) the Prop 8 camp was expected to avoid any overt anti-gay attacks, and instead soft-sell “traditional” marriage, with images of happy heteros and their perfect children.

But then, when truth is not on your side, all you can do is lie some more, and hope nobody notices. Isn’t that right, Frankie?

Today’s announcement from No On 8 (the good guys):

This morning, the proponents of Prop 8 turned to their only real weapon when they began their ad campaign to eliminate marriage for same-sex couples — fear and lies.

Their ad claims that the California Supreme Court “mandated” the right to marry for same-sex couples and, as a result, school children will be taught about same-sex marriage unless Prop 8 passes.

Of course it’s a blatant lie.

What the Court did was uphold the Constitution’s promise of equality.

And the proponents know that their claim that the law requires that children be taught about same-sex marriage in school is also a lie, just like the other false claims in their misleading ad.

But honesty clearly is not a value that the proponents of Prop 8 believe in.

We must respond to their ad. Please make a donation today.

Unfortunately voters may believe their lies unless we can raise the significant money needed to do our own ads telling the truth.

It is now very clear: the proponents of Prop 8 will stop at nothing to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry.

They will even use children as a political tool to mislead voters.

And they are spending millions of dollars to get their misleading message out to voters throughout California.

We can’t let this attack go unanswered. We must tell Californians the truth.

Help us respond to their ad — make a donation.

We know that a growing number of voters are beginning to see Prop 8 for what it really is: an effort to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry.

While we might be slightly ahead in some polls, we are still behind in dollars.

And money will be a major factor in whether we win or we lose — because this election will be decided on the airwaves. Whoever has more to spend — and is most effective in their ads — is more likely to win. It is that simple.

In the next four weeks, you can expect the proponents attack ads to get even uglier. The only way we can win is to match them dollar-for-dollar in ad buys — and then respond to their untrue attacks.

We cannot let their ads go unanswered!

Will you help us win the critical battle of the airwaves? Donate now!

Sincerely,

Dale Kelly Bankhead
Campaign Manager
No On 8

Donate today! Click to contribute

Me, I don’t get paid again until October 15th — but I did get some money for my birthday… and I know what I’m going to use it for.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: California, Education/Schools, Homophobia, Marriage, Media, Proposition 8, Radical Religious Right






September 28, 2008

And We’re “Just Curious” If Danny Funderburk Is A Delusional Crackpot

Mayor ‘just curious’ if Obama is antichrist

FORT MILL, S.C. — Fort Mill Mayor Danny Funderburk says he was “just curious” when he forwarded a chain e-mail suggesting Democratic Presidential Candidate Barack Obama is the biblical antichrist. “I was just curious if there was any validity to it,” Funderburk said in a telephone interview. “I was trying to get documentation if there was any scripture to back it up.” …

The e-mail, which has circulated in the last six months since Obama secured the Democratic nomination, claims the biblical book of Revelation says the antichrist will be in his 40s and of Muslim ancestry.

There is no such scripture. And Obama is not a Muslim. …

The urban legend Web site Snopes.com first exploded the myth in March. Funderburk forwarded the e-mail this month.

When asked if he believed Obama was the antichrist, Funderburk replied, “I’ve got absolutely no way of knowing that.” …

“I am curious about current events and their connection to the Bible,” he said.

We’re also curious about whether or not Funderburk’s brain stem goes all the way to the top.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: Barack Obama, Radical Religious Right, Random Stupidity, South Carolina






We’d Suggest Somebody Give Cindy Michaels a Makeover, But She Actually Enjoys Looking Like That Idiot

Just heard about this Bangor, Maine, news anchor named Cindy Michaels, who not only bears a striking resemblance to Sarah Palin, but shares the same frightening hair-don’t, cringemakingly trendy eyeglasses, and complete cluelessness in the proper application of makeup.

Normally, we’d feel sorry for Michaels — who says she’s been getting hate mail from both Palin-haters and Palin-lovers (sadly, the latter do exist) — and ask for volunteers to offer the poor thing a free makeover. Thing is, she likes looking like that idiot from Alaska. Go figure.

On the bright side, here’s one person who doesn’t have to fret about finding the right Halloween costume this year — answering the door in her everyday wear is sure to make children run screaming into the night:

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: Humor, Media, Republicans, Sarah Palin, Videos






If Palin Goes, It’ll Be Via the Ol’ Reliable “I Want to Spend More Time With My Family”

The ever-breathless New York Daily News sez:

Calls rise among Republicans for
Sarah Palin to step down from GOP ticket

As the economy worsens, so does Palin in the eyes of fellow Republicans.

Sarah Palin faces the biggest test of her month-old candidacy with this Thursday’s vice presidential debate, but many Republicans are already convinced the Alaska governor is not ready for prime time — and may never be.

“It was fun while it lasted,” conservative National Review columnist Kathleen Parker regretfully concluded last week. “But circumstances have changed since Palin was introduced as just a hockey mom with lipstick.” …

More enjoyable dimwit-dishing at the link.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: Election 2008, Republicans, Sarah Palin






Sarah Palin’s Neighbors Corroborate Christofascist Takeover of Wasilla

Last week, we heard from Rev. Howard Bess:

“Things got very intense around here in the ’90s — the culture war was very hot here,” Bess said. “The evangelicals were trying to take over the valley. They took over the school board, the community hospital board, even the local electric utility. And Sarah Palin was in the direct center of all these culture battles, along with the churches she belonged to.” …

This week, a longtime Wasilla resident tells an uncomfortably familiar story to Michelle Goldberg (author of Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism) in The Nation:

Pat O’Hara, a journalist who served on the Wasilla school board for twelve years, remembers how the religious right made her feel like a stranger in her own community. …

It wasn’t until the 1990s that local churches like the Wasilla Assembly of God, which Palin grew up attending, became aggressively political. A few years before Palin became mayor, a group of preachers confronted the school board with questions about social issues that had never before surfaced in local politics, according to O’Hara, who wrote first for the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman and then for the Anchorage Daily News. “They started asking me, ‘Would you allow a homosexual to teach in schools?’ and ‘Do you favor abortion?’” she said. “At the time, I didn’t know what was coming. I said, ‘This is not a school board issue. We have overcrowding. We have funding problems.’” The last time O’Hara ran, conservative pastors mounted an effort to defeat her, saying she favored hiring homosexuals, but they failed. Nevertheless, in 1996, feeling increasingly alienated in a place she’d lived for twenty-five years, she quit the school board and moved to more liberal Anchorage.

“The whole community changed,” she said. “It became extremely rigid and intolerant, and you can see that in every election since.” Palin, said O’Hara, “represents the worst of those values. She feels that because she’s a member of the right church, she’s chosen by God to inflict her values on everyone.”

With her vice presidential nomination, Sarah Palin has become the ultimate religious-right success story. Ever since the Christian Coalition was formed using the infrastructure of Pat Robertson’s 1988 presidential run, the movement has focused on building power from the ground up, turning conservative churches into little political machines. …

She has not always governed as a zealot; in fact, she’s a bit of a cipher, with scant record of speeches or writings on social issues or foreign policy. Nevertheless, several people who’ve dealt with her say that those concerned about church-state separation should be chilled by the idea of a Palin presidency. …

Palin’s nomination, and the energy she has injected into the GOP, show that, once again, reports of the death of the Christian right have been greatly exaggerated. …

Palin — who opposes gay rights, believes abortion should be banned even in cases of rape and incest, and supports the teaching of creationism — wasn’t known as a leader in Alaska’s religious right, but she clearly had ties to it, and to some of the more extreme fundamentalists in the United States. …

[Curt Menard, mayor of Mat-Su Borough (which includes Wasilla)] and his wife, Republican State Senate candidate Linda Menard — the former director of the Miss Wasilla pageant — have known Palin since she was in third grade. … They clearly adore Palin, and when Curt Menard describes her connections to the religious right, he doesn’t intend to be critical.

Echoing Pat O’Hara’s account, he recalled that the area had been solidly Democratic until the rise of politicized right-wing religion. …

When Palin ran for governor in 2006, Christian conservatives mobilized to help elect her — the Alaska Family Council, a group that formed that year and is loosely affiliated with Focus on the Family, distributed a voter guide showing Palin’s alignment with its ideology. …

Like McCain, Palin appears to believe that the United States is a Christian nation. As governor, she signed a resolution declaring October 21-27 Christian Heritage Week in Alaska, in order to remind Alaskans of “the role Christianity has played in our rich heritage.” Written in the mode of some right-wing revisionist historians, it describes the nation’s founders — including George Washington and Thomas Jefferson — as “Christians of caliber and integrity who did not hesitate to express their faith.”

The conviction that America is a Christian nation could be especially worrisome when coupled with the kind of apocalyptic beliefs espoused by the Wasilla Assembly of God, since the combination suggests a profoundly messianic foreign policy. …

Much more at the link to send a “ninety-mile-an-hour Alaska north wind” down your spine.

Posted by: Sapphocrat