September 10, 2007

Oh, But Then We’d Be Expecting Our Representatives to Actually Represent Us!

Charles Manson, Rolling Stone no. 61, June 1970
The message of gay
marriage opponents
is clear: Queers just
aren’t as good as
Charles Manson.

 

Regarding the same-sex marriage bill the California legislature just passed for the second time — which Governator Arnold Schwarzenegger is expected to veto — Patrick Connors asks a question that the bigots really wish none of us would ask:

I’d like to ask a question that pertains to the campaign platforms of the Democratic party candidates for President. Is this development in CA an example of the states taking care of the issue of same sex marriage? The California State Legislature is made up of two political bodies: the assembly and the senate. Both of these bodies are comprised of politicians that were elected by the citizens of California. Both of these bodies passed a bill — for the second time — that gives same sex couples the right to marriage. This legislation would undo the legislation passed in 2000 (Prop 22) that defined marriage in a way that prohibits LGBT (lesbian-gay-bi-transgender) people from being married.

Does the action of the legislature (elected by the people) represent the will of the voters or does Proposition 22 represent the will of the voters? …

. . .

The politicians that dodge the issue or offer the platitude “let the states decide” are accomplices to the bigotry… so are the people that don’t push political leaders to take a principled stand in support of equality and fairness.

If it’s ok for the states to decide this issue, then tell me: Was this issue resolved by the voters of California in 2000, or was it decided by the voters of California when they elected and re-elected their state representatives?

Also, please tell me why it is acceptable to jerk around a minority group that is not guilty of any crime and only seeks to have the same consideration of citizenship that an imprisoned serial killer has? Charles Manson can get married without having to put up with religious fanaticism, political opportunism or feckless friends getting in his way.

See also:
California senate OK’s same-sex marriage bill

Discuss this story

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |


Filed under: California, Marriage Equality







 

 
VOTE NOV. 4th!

 
Know the
SIX BIG LIES
About Proposition 8
a.k.a. "Six Consequences
If Proposition 8 Fails"

 
CALIFORNIA

California - Vote No On Proposition 8
 

Protect Marriage! Vote NO on California Proposition 8!
NO ON H8!
Wide variety of designs to
STOP California's anti-marriage amendment, Proposition 8

 
Can I Vote On YOUR Marriage Now?
Can I Vote On
Your Marriage Now?

Ripped off by
copycats everywhere!
Do the right thing
and get the original!

 
 
 
ARIZONA

Arizona - Vote No On Proposition 102 - Again!
 
 
 
FLORIDA

Florida - Vote No On Amendment 2