May 30, 2003

Excuse Me for a Moment…

Or, rather, for a few moments — I’m going to be out of town and unable to update for a few days — so if you’re starved for biting liberal commentary on the latest news, make sure to check any or all of the wonderful sites I have listed on the left right side of the page.

In the meantime, here are the tantalizing headlines that caught my attention this morning — and which I would have loved to blog, were I not in such a hurry to subject myself to yet another search at the hands of overzealous security people protecting harmless citizens like myself at one of the nation’s finest airports. (Did I ever mention, I hate going to the airport?)

Enjoy! (Well, maybe that’s not the right word…)

British PM shrugs off storm over weapons on visit to Iraq [Toronto Star: World]

POW ‘torture photos’ investigated. An inquiry starts into allegations Iraqi prisoners of war were mistreated, after British soldiers allegedly took pictures of the abuse. [BBC News | Front Page | UK Edition]

Toronto Sars scare grows. The number of people believed to have Sars in Toronto leaps, while thousands more are quarantined. [BBC News | Front Page | UK Edition]

Bush in Cracow/Poland. A nice carnival protest is being held now in Cracow against the imperial politics by G. W. Bush Jr. About 600 people is marching/dancing/noise maki… — www.indymedia.org:8080 [www.indymedia.org:8080 newswire]

Anti-globalization horde on offence. The two alternative villages met in their first demonstration on Thursday afternoon , to counter the efforts of local propaganda criminalizing the … — www.indymedia.org:8080 [www.indymedia.org:8080 newswire]

A Stray Thought: Are all Mac users left-wing Liberals?. “Don’t lie to me, Gustav! You’re a stinkin’ Mac user!” — indymedia.org:8080 [indymedia.org:8080 newswire]

How Much Is Enough?. The Bush administration is learning a simple if unwelcome lesson: it will take more troops to police and secure Iraq than it did to destroy the Saddam Hussein regime. By Michael R. Gordon. [New York Times: NYT HomePage]

Utah recruits firing squad. Officials in the US state of Utah are recruiting a firing squad after two death row convicts elect to be shot. [BBC News | World | UK Edition]

Former Attorney General Says Bush Should Be Impeached [IraqWar.ru (English)]

Blast shakes Canadian troops in Kabul [The Globe And Mail: International]

Blair: Eurosceptics are deluded [Guardian Unlimited: Politics]

Canadian veteran saves plane from hijacker [The Globe And Mail: International]

Canada ready to send peacekeeping troops to settle Palestinian-Israeli conflict [Pravda.RU: World]

British soldier arrested over abuse allegations [The Globe And Mail: International]

Canadian parliamentary committee backs gay marriage [Gay.com UK]

Bush Wants to Avoid Confrontation on Europe Trip [Reuters]

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Afghanistan, Canada, Civil Rights, Europe, George W. Bush, Iraq, Israel-Palestine, Marriage, United Kingdom & N.I., Utah


May 29, 2003

What’s Par for the Libertarians…

Obey the law and keep Bush off the Illinois ballot, say state Libertarians

Illinois should obey its ballot access laws — and keep President George W. Bush off the 2004 ballot.

So said the Libertarian Party of Illinois, after Republicans revealed that they would not nominate their 2004 presidential candidate until seven days after the Illinois deadline for certifying candidates for the November ballot.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) has requested that the Illinois State Board of Elections ignore the law, and place President Bush’s name on the ballot anyway.

“The Republican Party needs to abide by the same rule of law as everyone else,” said Illinois LP Executive Director Jeff Trigg. “You can be sure if the tables were turned — and it was the Libertarians nominating their presidential candidate seven days after the deadline — they wouldn’t lift a finger to help us stay on the ballot.”

The Republican Party will nominate its presidential candidate — almost certain to be incumbent George W. Bush, who faces no significant opposition and has already announced he will seek re-election — at its national convention on September 3, 2004. That’s 61 days before the November 2 general election.

However, Illinois state election law requires presidential candidates to be certified at least 67 days prior to the general election.

In response, the RNC has asked the State Board of Elections (SBE) to grant them an “exception” to the law. The board said it would consider the request at an upcoming meeting after getting a legal opinion from Attorney General Lisa Madigan.

But Libertarians said the State Board of Elections does not have the authority to grant exemptions — and thus arbitrarily decide which political parties must follow the law.

At a press conference in the State Capitol Press Room in Springfield on May 19, Trigg said the only way Bush can qualify for the ballot is if the Illinois General Assembly changes the law. …

Noting that Libertarian candidates have been kept off the ballot in the past because of restrictive ballot access laws, Trigg said the law should be enforced equally.

“Libertarians don’t believe President Bush should be kept off the Illinois ballot because of a technicality, any more than they believe their own candidates should suffer the same fate,” he said. “But the fact is that Libertarian and other candidates have been taken off the ballot on technicalities — and the Republican Party needs to abide by the same rule of law as everyone else.”

If the SBE does grant Bush an exemption to the law, it will merely prove that Illinois has a “double standard,” said Trigg. …

Libertarian Party
May 28, 2003
Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Election 2004, George W. Bush, Illinois, Libertarian Party, Republicans


Wanna Read Over My Shoulder?

Trucks in Iraq Could Be Linked to Bioweapons, C.I.A. Says

The discovery of two Iraqi truck trailers equipped with fermenters is the strongest evidence yet that Saddam Hussein had a biological weapons program, a U.S. intelligence report said Wednesday. But officials still have found no such weapons.

So far, I’m bored. But let’s continue…

The report by the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency comes as the Bush administration faces pressure to prove its justification for the war — that Saddam had to be disarmed of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons programs that were an imminent danger.

Pressure from whom? Georgie & Rummy don’t care if no WMD (that’s “weapons of mass destruction” to peons like you and me) are ever found, any more than they care if Osama-Saddama-Rama-bin-Hussladen is/are ever “hunted down and brought to justice.”

Now, Tony Blair cares — a lot; Poodle Boy’s entire future depends on the discovery of WMD. (Hope you’ve got your resumé polished, Tony!)

But do you really think — after telling the rest of the world to go to hell, and dismissing millions of protesters across the globe as nothing more important than mere “focus groups” — that Junior cares a whit about image?

“Examination of the trailers reveals … an ingeniously simple, self-contained bioprocessing system,” the report says. “Both trailers we have found probably are designed to produce BW agent in unconcentrated liquid slurry.”

“BW” is for “biological weapons.” U.S. officials believe Iraqi leaders were interested in developing mobile fermentation units for such weapons.

Fascinating. My cat is an ingeniously simple, self-contained bioprocessing system, too, designed to produce an amazing amount of unconcentrated liquid slurry like you wouldn’t believe — especially after eating a rodent that’s disagreed with her delicately-tuned system. (And if you don’t think what comes out of a cat can be considered potential “BW,” then you’ve never cleaned a litter box.)

Guess I’d better send Kitty to Syria before the inspectors land in my backyard.

There is no evidence the two trailers were ever actually used to make biological weapons, the intelligence officials said. Officials also said they did not expect to find biological agents inside the trucks, which they said the Iraqis probably had decontaminated.

Or, gee, maybe there never were any biological agents inside the trucks — ya think?

The report’s conclusions key on evidence from an Iraqi source, a chemical engineer who claims to have managed one of the mobile production plants.

That source has also identified photographs of the captured trailers, the new report says. Three other Iraqi sources also described efforts by Saddam’s government to build a mobile biological weapons plant.

Oh, you mean like those cartoons of trailers Colin Powell showed the U.N. back in February, that might be used for some nefarious purpose? That kinda trailer?

Intelligence officials who briefed reporters Wednesday on condition of anonymity, said they had considered and discarded possible legitimate uses for the trailers, ranging from the production of hydrogen to pesticides. The trucks would not be able to do any of those very well, they indicated.

Ah, but — says the prosecutor on cross-examination — they could be used for those things, couldn’t they? Actually, have you inspected them for the existence of, say, a propane burner and a refrigeration unit? How about a sign that says “Polish Dogs with the Works”? Because, boys, I’d be more inclined to believe you’ve stumbled across a roach coach. (Although, I will admit, the stuff produced by some roach coaches is just as toxic as the biochemical slurry that comes out of my cat.)

“The Iraqis had a motivation to inefficiently produce a biological agent,” said one intelligence official. “They had no motivation to inefficiently produce anything else.”

Huh? Back that truck up — figuratively, I mean. “The Iraqis had a motivation to inefficiently produce a biological agent.” You mean they wanted to produce a biological agent that didn’t work? That one’s completely over my head.

Captured Iraqi scientists have said the vehicles were for producing hydrogen for weather balloons in support of artillery. The report acknowledges the trailers could be used to make hydrogen but says the effort would be inefficient compared with widely available commercial hydrogen generation systems.

Okay, and exactly where do you expect the Iraqis are going to get “widely available commercial hydrogen generation systems”? As I recall, Iraq hasn’t been able to buy any “legitimate” war stuff, thanks to U.S.-led sanctions for the preceding twelve years. Gosh, ya think maybe they just had to make do with lousy, inferior hydrogen generation systems?

And, hey, guys, remember those aluminum tubes you were so bloody sure were for deadly bomb-making — and how you ended up with egg on your face? Your track record of speculating what an item might be used for hasn’t been so hot.

At this point, I think my roach coach theory is just as solid as your BW theory.

A technical analysis of the trucks showed they could be used, though inefficiently, to complete the early steps of creating a biological weapon, intelligence officials said. Based on information from the source, they believe each truck was part of a two-truck or three-truck system that could create a finished agent.

Or the beginnings of a U-Haul franchise. Okay, okay, go ahead — I’m listening…

Each of those multiple-truck systems — the CIA believes Iraq had around seven — could produce a few pounds of biological agent a month. The intelligence officials said they do not know which agent — anthrax, botulinum toxin or others — might have been involved.

Anthrax? I thought that’d be the last word you guys would want to mention — considering how the anthrax used in all those attacks right after 9-11 (on The National Enquirer offices, and then Democratic congresspersons) was traceable to an American source. But hey, okay, if you want to remind people of that — and of the high probability that if there were so much as a thimbleful of anthrax in Iraq, it would be because the U.S. sold it to Saddam.

The first truck was captured at a checkpoint run by U.S.-backed Kurdish militia in northern Iraq and then was turned over to American forces. The second, already looted, was found by U.S. forces in early May at the al-Kindi Research, Testing, Development and Engineering facility in the northern city of Mosul.

A third trailer, found in Baghdad, is a mobile toxicology laboratory from the 1980s, the report says. It could have legitimate uses or be part of a weapons program.

Okay, I’m starting to get bored again… Oh, wait! Look…

Information about the trailers, based largely on the Iraqi engineer’s description, was a key component of Secretary of State Colin Powell’s February 2003 presentation to the United Nations regarding Iraq’s alleged weapons programs.

The cartoon trailers! See, I knew that’s what we were talking about! Thanks for clearing that up!

The Pentagon had previously reported the trailers’ discovery and its suspicions that they were mobile labs.

Yeah — and they reported on the discovery of those pesky aluminum tubes, and a bomb casing that a scary “green band” around it, which was a sure sign of WMD. A sure sign. Sure.

The trailers have already been inspected by U.S. and British technical experts and a group of scientists from coalition countries. Another team of international experts arrived in Iraq Saturday to inspect the evidence and will probably need a few more days, U.S. officials in Iraq said Monday.

Hey, Georgie wouldn’t give U.N. inspectors a few more minutes; what makes you think— Oh, yeah, I forgot: You’re under the gun to justify Georgie’s “war.” Sorry, go ahead with your little goose chase.

Meanwhile, former Sen. Sam Nunn urged Congress to investigate whether the argument to go to war in Iraq was based on distorted intelligence. He said there was a possibility that President Bush’s policy against Saddam influenced the intelligence that indicated Baghdad had weapons of mass destruction.

A “possibility”?! Sam, my man, the Bushy Bunch totally put the thumbscrews to the CIA to come up with something, in spite of all those early warnings from the spooks that the WMD story just wasn’t gonna fly! But, okay, I understand — you feel you have to be diplomatic, don’t you?

Well, listen, Sam, I don’t presume to have any experience in the Senatorin’ bid-ness, but I can tell you this: Being “diplomatic” is exactly what got us into this mess in the first place. I mean, if the Democrats had stopped being so goddamned polite all the time and insisted on proper protocol, we wouldn’t have Bush in the White House, the USA Patriot Act in our bedrooms, and—

Oops, sorry, getting off-track here. You just hang in there, Sam, and don’t take no for an answer on this investigatin’ stuff.

The CIA and other U.S. intelligence agencies have begun a review of their prewar views of Iraq.

What’s that mean? That the CIA is going to look at what it was coerced to do in order to justify Georgie’s “war”? That’s what it sounds like to me.

Nunn, a Georgia Democrat and former chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, now heads the nonprofit Nuclear Threat Initiative. He spoke from Paris, where he met leaders about money to fight weapons proliferation.

Trucks in Iraq Could Be Linked to Bioweapons, C.I.A. Says
New York Times
May 28, 2003

Okay, stopping now — my head hurts. But that’s what always happens when I try to make sense of what the gov is trying to say.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush, Iraq, United Kingdom & N.I.


Big Brother Comes to Akron

Students will scan for meals

Akron school board OKs fingerprint system

Akron students will be fingerprinted beginning this fall to identify them in school lunch lines.

After a lengthy debate, school board members voted 5-2 Tuesday to spend $700,000 on a controversial, modernized cafeteria system.

Board members Rebecca Heimbaugh and Mary Stormer voted “no,” mirroring the concerns of parents about the cost and privacy issue involved with fingerprinting students.

“I do not believe that any parent or any student has ever had the expectation that in order to go through the lunch line or to buy a cookie or carton of milk that they or their children would be requested to first be fingerprinted,” said Heimbaugh, who says she will probably refuse to have her three children in the Akron schools fingerprinted. …

The system will replace the meal-ticket method that has been used in Akron middle and high school cafeterias for nearly two decades. It will not be used — at least initially — in elementary schools.

Students’ fingerprints will be put into a scanner that will make a template of binary numbers corresponding with the unique swirls and arches of each print. When students go through the lunch line, they will place their finger on a scanner that will identify them based on the stored template.

Designers of the system say the original fingerprints will be deleted.

School board members received numerous phone calls and e-mails from parents with privacy concerns about their children being fingerprinted. Those opposed to the system will have the option of having their children use an identification card. …

Board President Linda Omobien said the system will enable cafeteria workers to more easily track the number of free and reduced lunches, which they now accomplish by hand-counting meal tickets. She said this is “ludicrous” in modern times. …

Debra Foulk, coordinator of the Akron schools’ Child Nutrition Services, said these methods were less reliable and cost about the same as the one relying on fingerprints. She said children often lose cards — just as they now misplace meal tickets — and forget PINs. …

Raymond Vasvari, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union, said systems like the one adopted by Akron raise serious privacy issues. He said school leaders need to take steps to ensure that the fingerprint images don’t end up in the wrong hands.

“The question remains — is there information that would be useful to someone and how can you be sure this information is not shared?” he said.

Students will scan for meals
Beacon Journal
May 28, 2003

Oh, God forbid some kid should go through the line for an extra Kit-Kat Bar!

Now, seriously, folks, this is scary stuff. If you’re already opposed to the idea of a national DNA database, or a national identification card — or if you’re a traditional conservative who actually cares about the individual’s right to privacy — I don’t have to explain why this bogus excuse to start collecting bio-info from Akron’s schoolchildren is positively bone-chilling.

But, hey, if you need some talking points for your born-again, Bush-lovin’ family or co-workers (or just want to scare them half to death — which can be fun, too), you could always remind them that this is just the first step toward Revelation 13:16-18:

And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

Of course, if they’re really fanatical, they’ll just welcome this as a sign of the coming Rapture… the belief in which, actually, contributed significantly to putting Bush into the White House in the first place.

Huh? How can I say such a crazy thing? Well, one of these days, I promise, we’ll delve into how Bush — and in fact, the bulk of U.S. foreign policy — is driven by Christian fundamentalism (as well as the Bush administration’s willingness to exploit American Christianity for all it’s worth).

But this isn’t the time to get into the scary world of religious fundamentalism — you’ve got enough real facts to think about this morning.

Enjoy your conversation around the water cooler today. :)

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Civil Rights, Homeland Insecurity, Privacy, Radical Religious Right, Youth


Do Ya Think It’s Sexy?

Iraq weapons dossier ‘rewritten’

A dossier compiled by the government on Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction was rewritten to make it “sexier”, a senior British official has told the BBC.

The claim — hotly denied by Downing Street — came as Prime Minister Tony Blair became the first Western leader to visit post-conflict Iraq. …

The intelligence official told the BBC the dossier had been “transformed” a week before it was published on the orders of Downing Street.

He said: “The classic example was the statement that weapons of mass destruction were ready for use within 45 minutes.

That information was not in the original draft. It was included in the dossier against our wishes because it wasn’t reliable.

“Most things in the dossier were double source but that was single source and we believe that the source was wrong.” …

Responding to the BBC report, Defence Minister Adam Ingram rejected suggestions that the US-led coalition had effectively gone to war on a false pretext. He said the allegation that Downing Street had demanded changes to the dossier was untrue. …

Mr Blair has said he is still absolutely sure that weapons of mass destruction will be found. “Rather than speculating, let’s just wait until we get the full report back from our people who are interviewing the Iraqi scientists,” he said on Wednesday. …

The new questions over the dossier came as CBS reported that the bunker that the US attacked in the hope of killing Saddam Hussein at the beginning of the war never existed.

The American network quoted US Army Tim Madere, who is in charge of inspecting key sites in Baghdad, as saying there was no trace of a bunker or of any bodies at the Dora Farms.

Iraq weapons dossier ‘rewritten’
BBC News
May 29, 2003

Oh, didja miss that story about the nonexistent bunker? It’s right here.

Now, I promised you a real shot of Big Brother today, didn’t I? Well, here it comes…

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Iraq, United Kingdom & N.I.


What Elephant? Part 2

Still with me? Good. Now, take a deep breath, and get ready for a real revelation.

Look, I know — talk of the economy is usually a coma-inducer to most of us, because most of us aren’t economists who really get their rocks off on all those mind-numbing little details that go into the complex world of finance. Regular folks like you and me want to cut to the chase, and get to the real bottom line; i.e., will we have a paycheck next week (or next month, or next year)?

But trust me on this — you’ve got to read it, because this is the stuff impeachment trials are made of:

White House shelved deficit report

Study commissioned by O’Neill sees $44 trillion in red ink

The Bush administration has shelved a report commissioned by the Treasury that shows the U.S. currently faces a future of chronic federal budget deficits totaling at least $44 trillion in current U.S. dollars.

Wait. Stop. Read that again. Yes, it says $44 trillion. Not million, not billion, but trillion. Do you have any idea how much $44 trillion is? I certainly don’t. I mean, I can you tell it’s got 12 zeroes in it, but I can’t conceive of just how much money that is in terms of buying power, and, I expect, neither can you.

Okay, once that inconceivable amount of money has sunk in, read on — because the dollar amount doesn’t matter half as much as the fact that BushCo buried a report you should have heard about:

The study, the most comprehensive assessment of how the U.S. government is at risk of being overwhelmed by the “baby boom” generation’s future healthcare and retirement costs, was commissioned by then-Treasury secretary Paul O’Neill.

Emphasis on the “then” in “then-Treasury secretary Paul O’Neill.” Now can you figure why O’Neill was sacked (canned, fired, given his walking papers) in December?

But the Bush administration chose to keep the findings out of the annual budget report for fiscal year 2004, published in February, as the White House campaigned for a tax-cut package that critics claim will expand future deficits.

The study asserts that sharp tax increases, massive spending cuts or a painful mix of both are unavoidable if the U.S. is to meet benefit promises to future generations.

“Future generations,” boys and girls. That means your kids, and their kids, and their kids, and… you get the picture. And if you give half a whit about anybody’s kids, you darn well ought to give a whit about the fact that Bush does not. Give a whit, that is. The only thing the Boy King appears to care about (besides oil money and world domination) is pushing through his completely unrealistic tax cut — which is going to kill us economically, as confirmed by O’Neill’s report.

It estimates that closing the gap would require the equivalent of an immediate and permanent 66 percent across-the-board income tax increase.

The study was being circulated as an independent working paper among Washington think-tanks as President George W. Bush on Wednesday signed into law a 10-year, $350 billion tax-cut package he welcomed as a victory for hard-working Americans and the economy.

The analysis was spearheaded by Kent Smetters, then-Treasury deputy assistant secretary for economic policy, and Jagdessh Gokhale, then a consultant to the Treasury. Mr. Gokhale, now an economist for the Cleveland Federal Reserve, said: “When we were conducting the study, my impression was that it was slated to appear [in the Budget]. At some point, the momentum builds and you think everything is a go, and then the decision came down that we weren’t part of the prospective budget.”

The study’s analysis of future deficits dwarfs previous estimates of the financial challenge facing Washington. It is roughly equivalent to 10 times the publicly held national debt, four years of U.S. economic output or more than 94 percent of all U.S. household assets. Alan Greenspan, Federal Reserve chairman, last week bemoaned what he called Washington’s “deafening” silence about the future crunch.

President Bush signed into law a $350 billion tax-cut package on Wednesday saying: “We can say loud and clear to the American people: You got more of your own money to spend so that this economy can get a good wind behind it.” …

Yeah, there’s a lot of “wind” behind it, all right. (Insert your own snarky pot-shot here, folks — I can’t choose between making some amusing remark about Gone with the Wind, or taking the lower road and going right for the flatulence joke.)

An administration official said the study was designed as a thought-piece for internal discussion — one among many left every year on the cutting-room floor — and noted the budget’s extensive discussion of projected, 75-year Social Security and Medicare shortfalls.

White House shelved deficit report
Financial Times via MSNBC
May 29, 2003

Well, there goes my Social Security (and yours, and your kids’, and their kids’) — but, hey, I knew that. And good thing I’m not relying on the fed to take care of my failing health in my old age — which is, oh, just about 25 years off… or due to begin about the time that first “future generation” is really starting to feel the brunt of a (swallowing hard) $44 trillion deficit.

There is some good news in this bad news: at least this article gives you a virtual outline of talking points the next time some Bush-worshipping right-winger accuses you of being anti-tax-cut because you’re anti-Bush. Your reponse is now spelled out for you:

“I am against Mr. Bush’s $350 billion tax cut because it contributes to the $44 trillion deficit projected by the 2002 Treasury Department report that Mr. Bush chose to ignore in order to push through his own agenda. In order to rectify the damage already done, we would need an immediate and permanent tax increase of more than 66%. If we do not reign in this recklessness right now, your grandchildren and mine will be spitting on our graves as they attempt to make up for our mistakes. Is that what you want?”

Okay, so you might want to change the “spitting on our graves” line. And you might want to hone the whole thing down into shorter sentences; your opponents are even more bored by this economy stuff than you are — and most Bush-worshippers can’t digest more than ten or twelve words strung together. Nah, I’m not saying they’re stupid — I’m saying they’re used to having their information pre-digested for them, and regurgitated in short, easy-to-understand sound bites. That’s why Faux News and CNN (the Conservative News Network) are so popular — they relieve viewers of the burden of thinking.

In any case, be prepared for a fight — Bush drones tend to get very hostile when presented with facts.

But, wait! We’re not done yet, folks! If I’ve failed to amaze you with the first two stories of the morning, perhaps you’ll be more interested in the Iraq campaign — no, silly, not the “war” campaign, but the Iraq disinformation campaign. Stay tuned!

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Business/Economy, George W. Bush


What Elephant? Part 1

Don’t you just hate those mornings when you wake up super-early, realize you have another hour and a half to sleep… and then make the mistake of checking the news for just one teeny-tiny moment — and are sucked right into half a dozen fascinating items?

Well, I don’t hate it — it’s what gets news junkies like me primed and pumped for the day.

It’s a real 1984 kind of morning, folks — one just bursting with half-truths, quarter-truths, outright lies, coverups, convenient memory losses, and various sundry acts of chicanery, all topped off with a fat, red, gleaming cherry of Big Brotherism.

We begin with September 11th, 2001 — and an amazing revelation: No, not the revelation that somebody’s not telling the whole story, as that is neither a revelation, nor amazing, but the almost inconceivable idea that the right-wing mouthpiece known as MSNBC is actually printing Newsweek’s June 2 piece on the vexing secrecy of the 9-11 non-investigation:

Classified: Censoring the Report About 9-11?

Bush officials are refusing to permit the release of matters already in the public domain—including the existence of intelligence documents referred to on the CIA Web site.

Why is the Bush administration blocking the release of an 800-page congressional report about 9-11? The bipartisan report deals with law-enforcement and intelligence failures that preceded the attacks. For months, congressional leaders and administration officials have battled over declassifying the document, preventing a public release once slated for this week. NEWSWEEK has learned new details about the dispute.

Among the portions of the report the administration refuses to declassify, sources say, are chapters dealing with two politically and diplomatically sensitive issues: the details of daily intelligence briefings given to Bush in the summer of 2001 and evidence pointing to Saudi government ties to Al Qaeda. Bush officials have taken such a hard line, sources say, that they’re refusing to permit the release of matters already in the public domain—including the existence of intelligence documents referred to on the CIA Web site.

One document is called the PDB, the President’s Daily Brief. The congressional report contains details of PDBs provided to Bush (and top national-security aides) prior to 9-11. The PDBs included warnings about possible attacks by Al Qaeda. (One PDB was given at the presidential ranch in Crawford, Texas, on Aug. 6, and dealt with the possibility that Al Qaeda might hijack airplanes.) But an administration review committee overseen by CIA Director George Tenet has refused to declassify anything that even refers to the existence of PDBs — though they are described on the CIA’s own Web site (www.CIA.gov). A U.S. intelligence official said the review committee must consult with the White House before releasing anything. But the official denied charges by Florida Sen. Bob Graham, a Democratic presidential candidate, that Tenet’s review committee was covering up White House embarrassments. “We’re not playing politics,” the official says. “Our concern is national security.”

The other hot-button issue is the Saudis, sources say. The report discusses evidence that individuals with Saudi government connections may have provided the hijackers aid. One of them is Omar al-Bayoumi, a Saudi student who helped two hijackers get apartments in San Diego. The administration won’t declassify references to al-Bayoumi even though, in response to a NEWSWEEK story, an FBI spokesman confirmed last November that he was being investigated. The report also includes interviews with U.S. officials about Saudi cooperation in the war on terror. Many were critical of the Saudis. The administration is declassifying only the response by former FBI director Louis Freeh praising Saudi assistance on the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing case. The U.S. intelligence official said that, in response to a letter cosigned by Graham and Rep. Porter Goss, House Intelligence Committee GOP chair, the review committee was considering allowing more portions of the report to become public.

Classified: Censoring the Report About 9-11?
Newsweek via MSNBC
May 29, 2003

Now, if you’ve been following the story thus far (and if you have, you’re in the minority), none of this should come as any surprise. The only surprise here is that it’s hitting the American media, big-time. That’s bad for Georgie Boy — and good for the people of the United States — especially some 3,000 families who deserve to know why their loved ones got blown to bits the morning of September 11th for doing nothing more than getting out of bed and going to work.

Speaking of burying information, stay with me this morning, and let’s do some more digging — not into the rubble of the World Trade Center, but into the rubble of a once-thriving U.S. economy.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: George W. Bush, Homeland Insecurity, Republicans, Saudi Arabia, September 11


Luuuuuuucy! You Got a Lotta ‘Splainin’ to Do!

I was just finishing up a particularly snarky entry about the absence of WMD in Iraq, when I came across this blockbuster — or should I say bunker-buster?

No Bunker where U.S. Bombs Targeted Saddam — CBS

The Baghdad bunker which the United States said it bombed on the opening night of the Iraq war in a bid to kill Saddam Hussein never existed, CBS Evening News reported Wednesday.

The network quoted a U.S. Army colonel in charge of inspecting key sites in Baghdad as saying no trace of a bunker or of bodies had been found at the site on the southern outskirts of the Iraqi capital, known as Dora Farms.

“When we came out here, the primary thing they were looking for was an underground facility, or bodies, forensics, and basically, what they saw was giant holes created. No underground facilities, no bodies,” Col. Tim Madere said.

CBS, saying it was the first news organization to visit the site, reported that the CIA had searched it once and Col. Madere had searched it twice as part of efforts to find traces of DNA that could indicate if Saddam or his sons had been killed or wounded.

The network said the main palace in the compound remained standing despite the surrounding destruction. It quoted Madere as saying anyone who had been in the building could have survived the raid.

Shortly after the attack, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told reporters: “There’s no question but that the strike on that leadership headquarters was successful. We have photographs of what took place. The question is, what was in there?”

The United States effectively acknowledged that the March 20 raid failed to kill Saddam when it launched a second air attack aimed at the Iraqi president on April 7.

The fate of Saddam and his sons Uday and Qusay is still unclear.

Rumsfeld said earlier this month, “If you don’t have evidence he’s dead, you’ve probably got to assume he’s alive.”

Reuters
May 28, 2003

What — you’re not impressed? Don’tcha see? After drilling it into our skulls for the past two months that they were so bloody sure there was a bunker there, and they bombed it — even if Saddam wasn’t in it — now they’re admitting there never was any bunker in the first place. I think that’s pretty amazing.

Well, you know what they say about the first casualty of war. Not, mind you, that I’ve ever taken anything that comes from the collective maw of the Bush administration with more than a grain of salt — but I didn’t think the cracks in the mighty Dam of Disinformation would get so big, so fast!

See, this is why I’m a news junkie — every once in a while, you just turn up something really good… like, the truth.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: George W. Bush, Iraq


May 28, 2003

Clinton Wants Change in Presidential Term Limits

Bad timing, Bill!

I would have been for it were you were still Big-Dog-in-Chief, Bill — but I am not in favor of it until Georgie Boy and his PNAC playground pals are gone, gone, gone.

Bill, my man, I didn’t think you were a premature proposal-maker! Or (God forbid) did Rove pay you to say this?

Former President Bill Clinton said on Wednesday Congress should change the rule that barred him from seeking a third term in the White House, but stopped short of saying he wants to return as commander-in-chief.

Speaking at the John F. Kennedy Library and Museum here, Clinton questioned certain aspects of the 22nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which prevents a person from being elected president more than twice.

Clinton said the amendment, passed after Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected to a record fourth term, should be changed simply to keep a person from being elected to more than two consecutive terms as president. …

Clinton Wants Change in Presidential Term Limits
reuters
May 28, 2003
Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, PNAC & PNACers


Are State Quarters Cursed?

A strange series of coincidences befalls the 50 State Quarters.

Did the Old Man of the Mountain die of natural causes, or was a curse the culprit?

The distinctive rock formation had been famous since native Americans roamed the White Mountains. More recently, New Hampshire selected it for engraving as the state’s contribution to the U.S. Mint’s “50 State Quarters” program. When the rock’s face crumbled to dust in early May, it was a blow for naturalists and numismatics alike.

Age was cited as the official cause of the Old Man’s demise. But conspiracy theorists take note: since the Mint inaugurated the coin series, a string of unfortunate events has befallen many of its subjects.

Call it the Curse of the Quarter. …

Are state quarters cursed?
CNN/Money
May 27, 2003

Cool & eerie — especially if you live in Maryland, New Jersey, Kentucky, Rhode Island, Alabama, or North Carolina.

Since California has taken the title of Most Encononically Screwed State in the Nation (and since Ahhhh-nold is probably going to make a gubernatorial run), I’m almost tempted to say I’m not worried about the consequences once we get our own quarter.

On the other hand, I know all too well how things can always get worse. So once the Gov decides which design he likes, maybe we’ll finally get that one, last, big earthquake that’ll snap us off at the Nevada stateline and send us adrift into the Pacific. (Which, I know, would please far too many Americans!)

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Alabama, California, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Republicans


Giggle-Making Headline of the Day

President Rewards Like-Minded World Leaders With State Visits

“Like-minded”? You mean John Howard, Junichiro Koizumi, and Gloria Macapagal Arroyo can’t pronounce the word subliminal, either — and they make up words like misunderestimated and Hispanically?

Speaking of which, Dubyaspeak offers Junior’s latest mangling of the English language:

Al Qaeda is a group of people that they don’t care about taking innocent life.

— GWB
May 13, 2003
Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Asia, Australia/NZ, George W. Bush, Random Stupidity


Amnesty International Says…

Warning over war on terror.

The US-led campaign against terrorism has made the world a more dangerous place, Amnesty International says.

BBC News

I couldn’t agree more… although, frankly, I’m still working on trying to figure out exactly how attacking Iraq has made us “safer” right here in the good old U. S. of A. That’s what they told us, isn’t it?

If blasting a few thousand civilians to smithereens and turning a relatively civilized Middle Eastern nation into a hell of unchecked choas was supposed to make us “safer” and “protect our freedoms,” then why did we get ramped back up to an Orange Alert last week?

Beats me.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Homeland Insecurity, Middle East


49 & 50 = Smarter Than the Continental 48

Northern Revolt

Alaska Passes Anti-Patriot Act Resolution; Second State to Oppose Feds

Alaska has joined a growing national rebellion against the USA Patriot Act, voting to oppose the massive federal anti-terrorism law passed by Congress soon after Sept. 11, 2001.

The state Legislature used some of the strongest language yet in passing a resolution condemning USA Patriot, following the lead of Hawaii and 112 cities, towns and counties around the country that have passed similar resolutions against the law.

But Alaska’s measure goes further than most, advising police and other state agencies not to “initiate, participate in, or assist or cooperate with an inquiry, investigation, surveillance or detention” if there is not “reasonable suspicion of criminal activity under Alaska State law.”

“We have a concern that [the Patriot Act] could be abused. The potential for abuse is too great,” said Rep. David Guttenberg, a Democrat who co-sponsored the resolution. “America is an open state. There’s a cost to that. Where are we willing to sacrifice for that? Guys are dying on the battlefield to protect our freedoms. It’s up to us to protect those freedoms here at home.”

“We hope that a resolution like this, with the bipartisan support that it has, will urge Congress to re-examine the provisions of the USA Patriot Act that challenge the individual freedoms that make this country great,” said Rep. John Coghill, a Republican from North Pole who co-sponsored the resolution. “If we sacrifice our freedom, we let terrorism win.” …

Northern Revolt
ABC News
May 23, 2003

Read on, and you’ll see the expected rebuttal from “federal law enforcement sources,” who insist that that the civil-rights-gutting Patriot Act is essential for fighting the “war on terror,” yada, yada, yawn.

For some real doublethink, check out the last line of the last paragraph in the article:

Defending the Patriot Act, officials said the “hysteria” over reports that the FBI was watching libraries was stunning. The act does not specifically mention libraries, but library records would be considered business records, which are covered in the law. One senior official said surveilling libraries would be an “enormous waste of time and … would be an asinine use of FBI resources.”

Then why do you reserve the right to do just that — “surveilling” (which isn’t even a bloody word!) libraries — not to mention the plethora of ways the Act tramples the Bill of Rights?

Yeah, yeah, just another case of “Move along, nothing to see here.”

Well, hail, Alaska! I normally don’t dig on the Frozen State’s conservative politics, but the Patriot Act may turn out to be the one thing that really does unite liberals and traditional conservatives in the U.S. — at least temporarily. It goes completely against one of the most solid tenets of traditional conservatism and liberalism: keeping government small, and out of your private life.

The neocons running the country right now seem to know nothing of traditional conservatism. They’re so far off the scale that they’re actually pushing your average American lib and your average American con closer together, ideologically, than Joe American realizes.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Civil Rights, Hawaii, Homeland Insecurity, Privacy


Oh, the… er, What Humanity?

Okay, okay, so Lucky Larry wants rent that was due before September 11, 2001. It’s legal and all, but… comeonfortheloveofmike! Have a freakin’ heart, Silverstein! Cantor Fitzgerald lost 658 employees in the destruction of the World Trade Center — and you were insured up the ying-yang anyway, fercrimenysakes!

Damn, some people are coldhearted — and cheap — bastards:

Cantor Fitzgerald, the United States brokerage house that lost more people than any other company in the destruction of the World Trade Centre, has been sued by its former landlord for failing to pay rent for the six weeks that preceded the September 11, 2001, attacks.

According to a civil complaint filed on Friday and made public on Tuesday in Manhattan Supreme Court, Cantor Fitzgerald Securities, Cantor Fitzgerald L.P. and Cantor Fitzgerald Inc owe rent of US$1,027,658.96 ($1,789,411.39).

The figure covers the rent from August 1 through September 10, 2001, the day before two hijacked planes commandeered by suicide pilots crashed into the towers, killing nearly 3000 people. …

Cantor lost 658 of its 1000 employees when American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into 1 World Trade Centre, the first building to be hit, where Cantor occupied four of the highest floors.

The lawsuit was filed by Larry Silverstein, who held a 99-year lease on the twin towers from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which owned the buildings. In essence, Silverstein collected rent from the tenants and paid lease fees to the Port Authority. …

The suit seeks interest and attorney fees in addition to back rent.

Cantor Fitzgerald sued over World Trade Centre rent bill
New Zealand Herald
May 28, 2003

Just let it go, man. I would — especially with your money in my pocket.

So I’d make a lousy billionaire — so what? At least I could sleep at night.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Business/Economy, New York, September 11


Your Must-Read of the Day

Recently, I was the guest on a radio talk-show hosted by a thoroughly decent far-right Republician. I got verbally battered, but returned fire and, I think, held my own. Toward the end of the hour, I mentioned that the National Security Strategy — promulgated by the Bush Administration in September 2002 — now included attacking possible future competitors first, assuming regional hegemony by force of arms, controlling energy resources around the globe, maintaining a permanent-war strategy, etc.

“I’m not making up this stuff,” I said. “It’s all talked about openly by the neoconservatives of the Project for the New American Century — who now are in charge of America’s military and foreign policy — and published as official U.S. doctrine in the National Security Strategy of the United States of America.”

The talk-show host seemed to gulp, and then replied: “If you really can demonstrate all that, you probably can deny George Bush a second term in 2004.”

Two things became apparent in that exchange: 1) Even a well-educated, intelligent radio commentator was unaware of some of this information; and, 2) Once presented with it, this conservative icon understood immediately the implications of what would happen if the American voting public found out about these policies.

So, a large part of our job in the run-up to 2004 is to get this information out to those able to hear it and understand the implications of an imperial foreign/military policy on our economy, on our young people in uniform, on our moral sense of ourselves as a nation, on our constitutional freedoms, on our constitutional freedoms, and on our treaty obligations — which is to say, our respect for the rule of law.

Nearly 40% of Bush’s support is fairly solid, but there is a block of about 20% in between that 40% and the 40% who can be counted upon to vote for a reasonable Democratic candidate — and that 20% is where the election will be decided. We need to reach a goodly number of those moderate (and even some traditionally conservative) Republicans and independents with the facts inherent in the dangerous, reckless, and expensive policies carried out by the Bush Administration. …

When it’s your kids’ schools being short-changed, and your state’s and city’s services to citizens being chopped, your bridges and parks and roadways and libraries and public hospitals being neglected, your IRAs and pensions losing their value, and your job not being as secure as in years past — in short, when you can see the connection between Bush&Co.’s expensive military policies and your thinner wallet and reduced social amenities, true voter-education becomes possible. It’s still the economy, stupid. …

Bernard Weiner, Ph.D., has taught government & international relations at various universities, and was a writer/editor with the San Francisco Chronicle for nearly 20 years. He now co-edits the progressive website The Crisis Papers.

Bernard Weiner, The Crisis Papers
How We Got Into This Imperial Pickle: A PNAC Primer
Democratic Underground
May 27, 2003
Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: George W. Bush, Homeland Insecurity, Middle East, PNAC & PNACers, Republicans


May 27, 2003

Political Strikes, May 27, 2003

Political Strikes, May 27, 2003

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: George W. Bush, Humor


Spinning Private Lynch

If you’ve followed my blogging for the past two months, you know I’ve developed something of an obsession with the Jessica Lynch story. Not with the 19-year-old soldier herself, mind you (I’m sure she’s a lovely girl, but she’s just not my type — and, having evaluated her brother’s chamber-pot haircut on the evening news, I wouldn’t want to marry into the family). No, my interest is in the continually-morphing story of how Miss Teen American Rambo-ette gunned her way through hordes of evil Iraqis, and was shot, stabbed, and received two or three (or maybe more) broken arms, legs, etc., before being taken prisoner, and held in an Iraqi hospital, where she was slapped, tortured, and denied decent medical care — and then finally starred in a daring, captured-on-video, midnight-rescue raid by U.S. Special Ops forces.

Now, I naturally have my doubts about a lot of “facts” as reported in the American media, but — believe it or not — I’ve going to reign in much of my own skepticism here. I’m simply going to re-tell the tale of Jessica Lynch through nothing more than excerpts from scores of widely-reported news stories.

Why am I re-hashing yesterday’s news? I’m not: The Lynch saga is very much back in the news, thanks to a damning BBC documentary that blasts both the Pentagon’s “official” version of the story, and the numerous, contradictory media reports.

I know what I think about the tale of Private Robo-Teen — but I’m going to let you make up your own mind.

And I can’t be accused of tapping only the (harumph!) “liberal-biased media” — you’ll find such bastions of right-wing spin as Fox News, CNN, the Washington Times, and the Washington Post here, as well as right-leaning MSNBC, and the generally even-handed Reuters, et al.

Contents:

  1. Prologue: Casting Doubt
  2. The Wrong Turn
  3. Robo-Teen
  4. Follow the Bouncing Wounds
  5. At the Hospital
  6. Before the Raid
  7. Saving Private Lynch
  8. Aftermath
  9. Conflicting Viewpoints
  10. Misty Water-Colored Memories
  11. Hello, Central Casting…?
  12. And Get Me Jayson Blair for the Rewrites!
  13. Lights… Camera…!
  14. Just Rewards?
  15. The Iraqi “Hero’s” Payoff
  16. Questions Left Unanswered
  17. Bitter Endings
  18. In Perspective
  19. Rare Moments of Media Self-Reflection
  20. One Last, Odd Note


1. Prologue: Casting Doubt

In the 1998 film “Wag the Dog,” political operatives employ special editing techniques to create phony footage that will engender public sympathy for a manufactured war. Now we find that in 2003 the real-life Pentagon’s ability and willingness to manipulate the facts make Hollywood’s story lines look tame.

After a thorough investigation, the British Broadcasting Corp. has presented a shocking dissection of the “heroic” rescue of Pvt. Jessica Lynch, as reported by the U.S. military and breathless American media.

Robert Scheer
Saving Private Lynch, Take Two
Los Angeles Times
May 23, 2003

Jessica Lynch — an all American icon of the war. Captured by the Iraqis. Saved for the nation in a daring helicopter rescue.

This was a script made for Hollywood. Made by the Pentagon.

War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003

Private Jessica Lynch became an icon of the war, and the story of her capture by the Iraqis and her rescue by US special forces became one of the great patriotic moments of the conflict.

But her story is one of the most stunning pieces of news management ever conceived.

Saving Private Lynch story ‘flawed’
BBC News
May 15, 2003

…[which is] the polite British way of saying “liar, liar, pants on fire.”

Robert Scheer
Saving Private Lynch, Take Two
Los Angeles Times
May 23, 2003


2. The Wrong Turn

US officials say a convoy of vehicles from the 507th took a wrong turn Sunday…

Associated Press
March 26, 2003

The soldier, Pfc. Jessica Lynch, 19, of Palestine, W.Va., was part of the 507th Ordnance Maintenance Company ambushed in Nasiriya on March 23 after the military convoy she was in took a wrong turn in the dark off a highway en route to an antiaircraft battery in southern Iraq.

New York Times
April 1, 2003

Soldiers with the 507th Maintenance Company from Fort Bliss did not take a wrong turn in the early morning of March 23 when their convoy was ambushed by Iraqi soldiers near Nasiriyah, U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, said Thursday.

Reyes, who spoke to three wounded soldiers, including two staff sergeants, at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, said they told him they were ambushed on a bridge as they were attempting to catch up to a huge convoy of tanks and troops moving north to Baghdad. They had fallen behind because they had to repair several stalled vehicles.

El Paso Times
April 4, 2003


3. Robo-Teen

A band of paramilitary Iraqis attacked the truck convoy from all sides. One survivor said the unit immediately descended into chaos and that some of the soldiers’ guns jammed.

Army to probe Lynch capture
Washington Times
May 23, 2003

Pfc. Jessica Lynch, rescued Tuesday from an Iraqi hospital, fought fiercely and shot several enemy soldiers after Iraqi forces ambushed the Army’s 507th Ordnance Maintenance Company, firing her weapon until she ran out of ammunition, U.S. officials said yesterday.

Lynch, a 19-year-old supply clerk, continued firing at the Iraqis even after she sustained multiple gunshot wounds and watched several other soldiers in her unit die around her in fighting March 23, one official said.

“She was fighting to the death,” the official said. “She did not want to be taken alive.”

Rescued POW put up fierce fight
Washington Post
April 3, 2003

Pfc. Jessica Lynch shifted overnight from victim to teenage Rambo: all the cable news shows ran with a report from The Washington Post that the 19-year-old P.O.W. had been shot and stabbed yet still kept firing at enemy soldiers. In the hands of television, the story had instantly gelled into a heroic made-for-TV war movie, “Saving Meg Ryan.” Later yesterday, her father said she had not been shot or stabbed in the ambush of her unit.

New York Times
April 4, 2003

Pamela Nicolais, a cousin of Private Lynch, said that a military official told the family that she had ”limped to a hospital in Iraq” after her unit was ambushed, and had been turned over to Iraqi forces.

Jayson Blair
Rescue in Iraq and a ‘Big Stir’ in West Virginia
New York Times
April 3, 2003

The Jessica Lynch story was not all it seemed.

John Kampfner
War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003


4. Follow the Bouncing Wounds

She [Pfc. Jessica Lynch] was said to be doing well, but CNN reported that Lynch had suffered had suffered multiple gunshot wounds at some point during her ordeal in Iraq that made it hard to move her.

Reuters
April 1, 2003

Her condition was not disclosed, but U.S. officials in Kuwait said she was believed to have broken legs, a broken arm and at least one gunshot wound.

Associated Press
April 2, 2003

Lynch also was stabbed when Iraqi forces closed in on her position, the official said, noting that initial intelligence reports indicated she had been stabbed to death. No official gave any indication Wednesday, however, that Lynch’s wounds had been life-threatening.

Tampa Tribune
April 3, 2003

Lynch… sustained multiple gunshot wounds… Lynch was also stabbed when Iraqi forces closed in on her position, the official said, noting that initial intelligence reports indicated that she had been stabbed to death. …

She was in “stable” condition, with broken arms and a broken leg in addition to the gunshot and stab wounds, sources said. Other sources said both legs were broken, and one arm. …

The only injuries the pharmacist said he was aware of were to Lynch’s leg, but there was no way to evaluate his statement.

Rescued POW put up fierce fight
Washington Post
April 3, 2003

A U.S. commando team whose name remains secret rescued Lynch early Wednesday. She underwent surgery at a military hospital in Germany and was scheduled for more, her parents said yesterday. Her father said doctors had found no evidence of gunshot or stab wounds.

Knight Ridder News Service
April 4, 2003

The 19-year-old Army supply clerk was undergoing surgery yesterday at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany for a fractured disc, two broken legs and a broken arm.

New York Post
April 4, 2003

Since her rescue, Lynch has been flown to U.S. Ramstein air base in Germany and has undergone back surgery. Her parents in West Virginia said she has two broken legs and a broken right forearm.

Reuters
April 4, 2003

Lynch’s family has said doctors had determined she’d been shot. They found two entry and exit wounds “consistent with low-velocity, small-caliber rounds,” her mother has said.

Details Released of Lynch Rescue
Fox News
April 5, 2003

There was never a bullet wound,” said al-Houssona, who operated on Lynch to install a metal plate in her leg. “It’s a myth if [someone said] there was.”

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

[Said Dr Harith a-Houssona:] “They want to distort the picture. I don’t know why they think there is some benefit in saying she has a bullet injury.”

Saving Private Lynch story ‘flawed’
BBC News
May 15, 2003

A medical checkup by U.S. doctors confirmed the account of the Iraqi doctors, who said they had carefully tended her injuries, a broken arm and thigh and a dislocated ankle, in contrast to U.S. media reports that doctors had ignored Lynch.

Robert Scheer
Saving Private Lynch, Take Two
Los Angeles Times
May 23, 2003

[The commander of the military hospital in Germany] also said she had been neither shot nor stabbed. …

But none of those stories got the play of the first, and none of them specifically said, “Look, folks, we’re not so sure anymore.”

Richard Cohen
On Not Admitting Our Mistakes
Washington Post
May 23, 2003


5. At the Hospital

We all became friends with her, we liked her so much,” [Dr. ] Houssona said. “Especially because we all speak a little English, we were able to assure her the whole time that there was no danger, that she would go home soon.” …

[T]hey all made a point of giving Lynch the best of everything, [Raazk] added. Despite a scarcity of food, extra juice and cookie were scavenged for their American guest.

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

Despite her nationality, lack of supplies and the chaos of treating dozens of Iraqi wounded, hospital workers were proud of how they treated Lynch as a “guest” rather than a war prisoner. They said the staff donated two of the three pints of blood she received.

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

We give her three bottles of blood… two of them from medical staff… because there is no blood at this time.

Dr Harith Al-Houssona
War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003

After awakening two days later, Lynch was cared for by two nurses in round-the-clock shifts.

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

Iraqi doctors in Nasiriya say they provided the best treatment they could for the soldier in the midst of war. She was assigned the only specialist bed in the hospital and one of only two nurses on the floor.

Saving Private Lynch story ‘flawed’
BBC News
May 15, 2003

They also assigned to Lynch the hospital’s most nurturing nurse, Khalida Shinah. At 43, Shinah has three daughters close to Lynch’s age. She immediately embraced her foreign patient as one of her own.

[Said Houssona:] “And she really bonded with Khalida. She told me, ‘I’m going to take her back to America with me.’” …

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

Private Lynch’s military guards would allow no other doctor to tend to her and Dr Harith formed a friendship with her. She talked to him about her family, including her arguments about money with her father, and about her boyfriend, a Hispanic soldier named Ruben.

So who really did save Private Jessica?
Times Online
April 16, 2003

Ramona Lynch, whose husband was Lynch’s third cousin, said she suspects that the surgeries on Lynch’s legs may have been necessary because the bones were knitting together improperly.

“She laid there for eight days before they rescued her,” Ramona Lynch said at her home on Lynn Camp Road near Palestine. “They may have had to break them and reset them.”

[Lynch’s cousin, Pam Nicolais] isn’t so sure.

“The doctors and nurses over there (in Iraq), and this is from Greg Sr., were very good to her,” she said. “Whether they did anything to her, I don’t know. That stuff isn’t important to me. Her well-being is what matters now.”

Community celebrates 20th birthday of Jessica Lynch
Herald-Dispatch
April 26, 2003


6. Before the Raid

Briefing reporters at Central Command headquarters, Brooks said the hospital apparently was being used as a military command post.

Rescued POW put up fierce fight
Washington Post
April 3, 2003

Witnesses told us that the special forces knew that the Iraqi military had fled a day before they swooped on the hospital.

Saving Private Lynch story ‘flawed’
BBC News
May 15, 2003

The question is, did the army know beforehand that there were no hostile forces at the hospital where Lynch was kept? As it turns out, of course, there weren’t, so who were the soldiers firing at? Was there any resistance at all? Since the army has already shredded their credibility by lying about Lynch’s “gunshot wounds,” these are reasonable questions to ask.

Kevin Drum
Calpundit

May 20, 2003

“The most important thing to know is that the Iraqi soldiers and commanders had left the hospital almost two days earlier,” [Dr. Harith] Houssona said.

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

John Kampfner: The doctors told us that the day before the Special Forces swooped on the hospital the Iraqi military had fled. Did the Americans know this? We found a man who saw an advance party land in the town. He says he was questioned by the team’s translator.”

Hassam Hamoud: “He said; ‘where is Saddam Hospital?’ I said, ‘in that direction’. He said; ‘are there any Fedayeen over there?’ I said; ‘no, there aren’t any, there is no forces in there or anything.’”

John Kampfner: “All the same America’s finest warriors descended on the building.”

War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003

Watching it all from a safe distance near his house was Hamoud, the hospital neighbor, who said an interpreter with the landing U.S. commandos approached him and asked if there were Iraqi fighters inside the hospital. Hamoud said there were not.

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

There was one more twist. Two days before the snatch squad arrived, [Dr Harith a-Houssona] had arranged to deliver Jessica to the Americans in an ambulance.

Saving Private Lynch story ‘flawed’
BBC News
May 15, 2003

Every time, ‘I want to go home, I want to go home.’ We told her, I secretly between us, I and she, I told her… I will try to escape you to the American Army… but I will do this very secretly because I lose my life.”

Dr Harith Al-Houssona
War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003

[Said Dr. Houssona:] “The night [the Iraqi soldiers and commanders] left, a few of the senior medical staff tried to give Jessica back. We carefully moved her out of intensive care and into an ambulance and began to drive to the Americans, who were just one kilometre away.”

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

Ultimately, Lynch was loaded into an ambulance and driven off by Sabah Khazaal, a hospital driver, and an Iraqi officer, the staff said. Soon afterward, at an Iraqi army checkpoint, another Iraqi gave the officer a gun and told him to shoot Lynch, but the officer refused, saying that was against Muslim belief, according to Khazaal.

Farther up the road, Khazaal said, the ambulance approached a U.S. Army checkpoint. The driver slowed down and turned on his ambulance lights, but then he heard gunfire, which he assumed was coming from the checkpoint, so he quickly turned around and returned to the hospital.

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

The Americans had almost killed their prize catch.

Saving Private Lynch story ‘flawed’
BBC News
May 15, 2003

“We told him go to the American checkpoint…”

Dr Harith Al-Houssona
War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003

“But when the ambulance got within 300 metres, they began to shoot. There wasn’t even a chance to tell them ‘We have Jessica. Take her.’” …

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

That night, another driver, Abdul-Hadi Hannoon, said he told Lynch he would drive her to the U.S. checkpoint in the morning.

About an hour later, just around midnight, the staff heard an explosion that knocked out the hospital’s power. The rescue mission had begun.

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003


7. Saving Private Lynch

You’ve seen the footage on the news: a U.S. special forces team bursts into an Iraqi hospital to snatch the cute blonde soldier from the jaws of the enemy. The whole Hollywood moment was recorded by night-vision cameras.

Eye takes look at war spin
Halifax Daily News
May 25, 2003

Lynch’s April 1 rescue came at a critical time. Field commanders were expressing surprise at the Iraqi resistance, and Lynch went missing during one of the ambushes that gave the impression that the U.S. advance was bogging down. That day’s newspaper front pages featured a disturbing story of how U.S. soldiers wiped out an entire Iraqi family at a road checkpoint.

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

With Jessica’s life in peril a snatch squad was sent in to take her from her hospital bed in Nasariyah. They took fire on their way in and out of the building, a military video team capturing every step in the action.

John Kampfner
War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003

Lynch’s rescue at midnight local time Tuesday was a classic Special Operations raid, with U.S. commandos in Black Hawk helicopters engaging Iraqi forces on their way in and out of the medical compound, defense officials said.

Acting on information from CIA operatives, they said, a Special Operations force of Navy SEALs, Army Rangers and Air Force combat controllers touched down in blacked-out conditions. An AC-130 gunship, able to fire 1,800 rounds a minute from its 25mm cannon, circled overhead, as did a reconnaissance aircraft providing video imagery of the operation as it unfolded.

Rescued POW put up fierce fight
Washington Post
April 3, 2003

As helicopters carrying the Special Ops forces landed outside the hospital, Predator drones circled overhead, sending pictures back to intelligence officers, who briefed commanders in the supersecure Joint Operations Center. One detachment of Marines made a diversionary attack on another part of the city, while the main force landed at the hospital and began searching for Lynch. …

She was hiding in her bed just after midnight when the Special Ops team found her, in a room on the first floor of Saddam (naturally) Hospital in An Nasiriya. A soldier called her name, and without answering she peeked out from under the sheets. “Jessica Lynch,” he called, “we’re United States soldiers and we’re here to protect you and take you home.” The American approached the bed and took his helmet off and she looked up at him and replied: “I’m an American soldier, too.”

Jessica’s Liberation
Newsweek
April 14, 2003

“Jessica held up her hand and grabbed the Ranger doctor’s hand, and held onto it for the entire time, and said, ‘Please don’t let anybody leave me,”‘ Renuart said. “It was clear she knew where she was and didn’t want to be left anywhere near the enemy.”

Details Released of Lynch Rescue
Fox News
April 5, 2003

When they found her, she “seemed to be in a fair amount of pain,” officials later recounted, and she was strapped to a stretcher to be carried down a flight of steps and outside to a helicopter. As her chopper took off, she grabbed the hand of the Army doctor and pleaded, “Don’t let anybody leave me.”

Jessica’s Liberation
Newsweek
April 14, 2003

Lynch was rescued, with the operation — or at least parts of it — caught by soldiers using a night vision camera. Last month, Pentagon officials gave the impression that the raid was carried out against potentially dangerous resistance.

Was Lynch rescue made up? 2 Illinois pols want to know
Chicago Sun-Times
May 25, 2003

But reports have emerged that the raid may have been unnecessary because there was no resistance at the hospital. … U.S. troops burst into the hospital, doctors said, adding that they could simply have walked in with no problem because there were no Iraqi guards left.

POW’s Memory Is Casualty Of War
CBS News
May 8, 2003

Turns out… there was no one there but doctors and patients…

Eye takes look at war spin
Halifax Daily News
May 25, 2003

“We were surprised. Why do this? There was no military, there were no soldiers in the hospital,” said Dr Anmar Uday, who worked at the hospital. “It was like a Hollywood film. They cried ‘go, go, go’, with guns and blanks without bullets, blanks and the sound of explosions. They made a show for the American attack on the hospital — action movies like Sylvester Stallone or Jackie Chan.”

Saving Private Lynch story ‘flawed’
BBC News
May 15, 2003

Having fled to an X-ray room, the hospital doctors said they could not see much but heard explosions, likely the sound of plastic explosives blowing the locks off doors. They said they also thought they heard shooting but afterwards found no evidence of bullet holes.

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

Separately, the Iraqi doctors describe how the tension fell away rapidly once the Americans realized no threat existed on the premises. A U.S. medic was led to Lynch’s room as others secured the rest of the three-wing hospital.

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

But the Americans took no chances, restraining doctors and a patient who was handcuffed to this bed frame.

John Kampfner
War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003

Several staff and patients were placed in plastic handcuffs, including, according to Houssona, one Iraqi civilian who was already immobilized with abdominal wounds from an earlier explosion. …

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

Four doctors and two patients, one of whom was paralysed and on an intravenous drip, were bound and handcuffed as American soldiers rampaged through the wards, searching for departed members of the Saddam regime.

So who really did save Private Jessica?
Times Online
April 16, 2003

“The whole thing lasted about four hours,” [Dr. Mudhafer] Raazk said. “When they left, they turned to us and said `Thank you.’ That was it.”

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

The “rescue mission” amounted to a shock and awe campaign against a bunch of frightened doctors and nurses who were taking care of Lynch.

Mike Hudson
Bush, Willie Nelson Share Much in Philosophy, Texas, Past Drunkenness
Niagara Falls Reporter
May 27, 2003

“They made a big show,” said Haitham Gizzy, a physician at the public hospital here who treated Lynch for her injuries. “It was just a drama,” he said. “A big, dramatic show.”

Iraqis Say Lynch Raid Faced No Resistance
Washington Post
April 15, 2003

Commandos whisked Lynch to the Black Hawk helicopter that had landed inside the hospital compound, he said, while others remained behind to clear the hospital.

Rescued POW put up fierce fight
Washington Post
April 3, 2003

Just after midnight on April 2, Central Command officials summoned journalists back to the base and, after a several-hour wait, informed them about the first successful rescue mission of an American POW since World War II.

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

In an April 2 briefing, Central Command spokesman Gen. Vincent Brooks… showed dramatic film and still pictures of the raid. In one photograph, Lynch is shown aboard a U.S. helicopter with a folded American flag on her chest.

POW’s Memory Is Casualty Of War
CBS News
May 8, 2003

General Vincent Brooks: “It was a classic joint operation, done by some of our nation’s finest warriors who are dedicated to never leaving a comrade behind. At this point she is safe. She’s been retrieved. I asked her who was holding her — the regime was holding her.”

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld: “We are certainly grateful for the brilliant and courageous rescue of Sergeant, correction PFC Jessica Lynch who was being held by Iraqi forces in, in what they called a hospital.”

John Kampfner: “Two weeks ago we visited the scene of Jessica’s rescue. Although Iraqi forces had occupied part of it, this was a hospital like any other.”

War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003


8. Aftermath

The Iraqi medical staff fanned out to assess the damage. In all, 12 doors were broken, a sterilized operating theatre contaminated, and the specialized traction bed in which Lynch had been placed was trashed.

“That was a special bed, the only one like it in the hospital, but we gave it to Jessica because she was developing a bed sore.” …

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

Bizarrely, the rescuers cut open a special bed, designed for patients with bed sores, which had been provided for Private Lynch’s use.

“They took samples of sand out of it,” Dr Harith said. “It was the only bed like it that we have, the only one in the governorate.”

Today, the hospital struggles on without adequate supplies of drugs and without running water or mains electricity.

So who really did save Private Jessica?
Times Online
April 16, 2003

Back at the hospital, the doctors, nurses and drivers have not seen the dramatic reports about how Lynch was saved. They just wish for some acknowledgment of how they helped her.

“Just a thank you,” said Hannoon, the second ambulance driver. “That would make us very happy.”

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

Three days after the raid, the doctors had a visit from one of their U.S. military counterparts. He came, they say, to thank them for the superb surgery.

“He was an older doctor with gray hair and he wore a military uniform,” Raazk said.

“I told him he was very welcome, that it was our pleasure. And then I told him: `You do realize you could have just knocked on the door and we would have wheeled Jessica down to you, don’t you?’

“He was shocked when I told him the real story. That’s when I realized this rescue probably didn’t happen for propaganda reasons. I think this American army is just such a huge machine, the left hand never knows what the right hand is doing.”

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003


9. Conflicting Viewpoints

Several officials cautioned that the precise sequence of events is still being determined, and that further information will emerge as Lynch is debriefed.

Rescued POW put up fierce fight
Washington Post
April 3, 2003

What’s Washington going to do when it finds out that our national broadcaster has aired a documentary that makes the current war-mad regime look like a bunch of ham-fisted liars? Will the U.S. close the borders altogether, instead of just slowing them down? Will we have to endure iris-scans just to pop over the line for a carton of smokes? Or maybe they’ll refuse to sell CTV the next season of American Idol. Now, that would hurt.

War Spin: The Truth About Jessica… (which should have been called Saving Private Lyin’) is from the BBC, which doesn’t, apparently, act as a government house organ either.

Why the kerfuffle? Because veteran reporter John Kampfner shows us that the recent “rescue” of Private Jessica Lynch from Iraq was actually a bunch of bollocks.

Eye takes look at war spin
Halifax Daily News
May 25, 2003

Defense officials said on Friday the Pentagon was insulted by media claims the rescue of Jessica Lynch in Iraq was hyped to boost support for the war as questions swirled over the private’s capture, her rescue and injuries. … Pentagon spokesman Marine Lt. Col. Dave Lapan said it was “ludicrous and insulting” for the BBC to suggest the rescue was staged and hyped up.

Pentagon nixes claim Lynch rescue was hyped
Reuters
May 24, 2003

“In our film, the British military spokesman, who figured very much in BBC, CNN and all the international broadcasters’ coverage of the war, told us on camera that he was deeply unhappy with the American media handling,” [BBC’s John] Kampfner said. “And he said to us, ‘There were two different styles of media management, there was the American one and the British one, and I was pleased to be part of the British one.’ And that, to me, that’s a pretty damning indictment.”

BBC, DOD differ on Lynch rescue news
Stars and Stripes
May 24, 2003

Maybe the Pentagon hyped the Lynch story. Maybe in the confusion of the rescue, some honest people in the Pentagon just got things wrong.

Richard Cohen
On Not Admitting Our Mistakes
Washington Post
May 23, 2003

Experts in war propaganda say the official tale fit all too nicely into the neat story line the Bush administration wanted to push and the American public wanted to hear at a time when the war did not appear to be going very well.

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

HARRIS: Is it your belief right now based upon your investigation that this rescue of Lynch was in any way a staged event and not real?

KAMPFNER: No. First things first. Credit where it is due. The Americans had a legitimate right in getting Lynch out of the hospital in Nasiriya. They had no way of knowing what her fate was, whether she was being well or badly treated.

So, it is entirely legitimate for any country to want to get its own out as quickly and as safely as possible.

Where we took issue with the official version as put out by Central Command, in Doha, [Qatar], to the world’s press, was the way the Americans did it. They went in, all guns blazing, helicopters, a great, heroic rescue mission.

The contention of the Iraqi doctors we spoke to was, well, actually they didn’t need to do that, they could have come and got her. And in fact, one of the doctors said the day before the Americans conducted this very elaborate rescue mission, they had actually tried to get Lynch to the Americans, by putting her in an ambulance, taking her to the front line. In the course of that journey, according to the doctors, that ambulance came under fire from American forces, and they had to take her back to the hospital.

BBC correspondent defends Lynch documentary
CNN
May 20, 2003

The story of Jessica Lynch is the tale of how a modern war icon is made, and perhaps how easily officials and journalists with different agendas accepted contradictory, self-serving versions of what happened to her.

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

Claims about escapes or rescues are often a red flag. There were only 28 escapes throughout the entire Vietnam War and that number included some civilians, [said Mary Schantag, co-founder and researcher for the POW Network].

“There were no planned successful rescues since WWII until Jessica Lynch,” she said, referring to the 19-year-old Army supply clerk rescued during the recent war in Iraq.

Schantag said the public needs to be aware of the problem and exercise some skepticism, especially schools and veterans organizations. The VFW is beginning to require prospective members to agree to searches of their military records, she said.

“People need to do their homework before they get somebody to speak, especially when [the tale] is too good to be true,” she said.

Vets fight to expose fakes
Press Enterprise
May 27, 2003

Though the Bush administration’s shamelessly trumped-up claims about Iraq’s alleged ties to al-Qaida and 9-11 and its weapons of mass destruction take the cake for deceitful propaganda — grand strategic lies that allow the United States’ seizure of Iraq’s oil to appear to be an act of liberation — the sad case of Lynch’s exploitation at the hands of military spinners illustrates that the truth once again was a casualty of war.

Lynch… has suffered enough in the line of duty without being reduced to a propaganda pawn.

Robert Scheer
Saving Private Lynch, Take Two
Los Angeles Times
May 23, 2003

It was a great yarn the White House spun until it became apparent that the poor girl had been injured in a highway accident, hadn’t fired a shot, and had not been shot, stabbed or tortured.

Mike Hudson
Bush, Willie Nelson Share Much in Philosophy, Texas, Past Drunkenness
Niagara Falls Reporter
May 27, 2003

[Longtime peace activist Cindy Litman] said she believed the Bush administration’s “desperate attempt” to generate positive publicity — she counted what she said was the hyping of the story of the rescue of Pfc. Jessica Lynch, something the Pentagon denied Friday — is proof that the anti-war movement made its mark. And, she said, history might yet show that the United States fought the war differently because of international scrutiny.

Peace Coalition brings its perspective to holiday
Davis Enterprise
May 27, 2003


10. Misty Water-Colored Memories

Rescued POW Jessica Lynch (search) says she can’t remember anything about her time in captivity in Iraq — a huge obstacle for military investigators who were hoping the 19-year-old soldier would be the key to revealing Iraqi war crimes…

Sources Say Jessica Lynch Has Amnesia
Fox News
May 4, 2003

Military officials have said that Lynch’s last memory of the attack after which she was captured is a rocket-propelled grenade hitting the vehicle she was riding in. …

[S]he has “no memory whatsoever of any of the events from the time her convoy came under attack until she woke up” in an Iraqi hospital, said [Dr. Greg] Argyros, assistant chief for the Department of Medicine at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and head of the team handling Lynch’s care.

POW’s Memory Is Casualty Of War
CBS News
May 8, 2003

[Dr. Isadore Rosenfeld] said Lynch is likely suffering from something called total global amnesia, which often occurs after someone endures a traumatic emotional and/or physical stress.

Sources Say Jessica Lynch Has AmnesiaFox News
May 4, 2003

[Dr. Argyros] said it’s not a case of amnesia, which he defined as forgetting something you once knew. Rather, Lynch simply has no memory of the ambush March 23 that resulted in her capture.

POW’s Memory Is Casualty Of War
CBS News
May 8, 2003

Asked if Lynch would eventually remember details of her ordeal, Rosenfeld said: “I would expect that she would, yes.”

Sources Say Jessica Lynch Has Amnesia
Fox News
May 4, 2003

It’s unlikely that Pfc. Jessica Lynch will ever remember what happened in Iraq when her Army convoy was ambushed and she was taken as a prisoner of war, her doctor said Thursday.

POW’s Memory Is Casualty Of War
CBS News
May 8, 2003

“These things usually take months — sometimes years — but usually months to eventually clear up,” and the patient recovers, Rosenfeld said.

Sources Say Jessica Lynch Has Amnesia
Fox News
May 4, 2003

Asked if she will ever remember, Argyros said there’s only a small chance.

POW’s Memory Is Casualty Of War
CBS News
May 8, 2003

The military has had Lynch talking to psychiatrists but they may soon bring in additional people, including others from her military unit who survived the ambush, to help refresh her memory. They say she “has to be brought back to reality,” since she may be the last living witness to war crimes in Iraq against those U.S. soldiers.

Sources Say Jessica Lynch Has Amnesia
Fox News
May 4, 2003

“It appears after the evaluations that we have done thus far, that there’s a chance in the future that she may,” [Dr. Argyros] said. “But the likelihood is very low that she will remember any of the events from the time of the attack until the time she woke up in the Iraqi hospital.”

POW’s Memory Is Casualty Of War
CBS News
May 8, 2003

One Army official said that it could be some time before Lynch is reunited with her family, since experience with those taken prisoner since the Vietnam War indicates that soldiers held in captivity need time to “decompress” and reflect on their ordeal with the help of medical professionals.

Rescued POW put up fierce fight
Washington Post
April 3, 2003

Soldiers from Jessica’s El Paso, Texas-based 507th Maintenance Company have been warned not to talk. A soldier in that unit said, “It’s almost ’say a word and you’ll be shot at dawn.’”

Jessica has been locked up in a private Walter Reed hospital room with an around-the-clock security detail normally reserved for high brass to ensure that what happened to her as a prisoner of war remains inside her room. Medical personnel who look after her have been given the same keep-your-trap-shut treatment as the 507th troopers. Almost daily her cover story changes from amnesia to partial amnesia to more recently: “She’s blocked just the ambush event.” …

[S]ooner or later, the truth will be told about Jessica and her 507th comrades-in-misfortune. …

Pentagon covering up Jessica story
(Kankakee) Daily Journal
May 23, 2003


11. Hello, Central Casting…?

One could have easily gotten the impression last week that the war in Iraq is being fought to liberate pretty young American girls from Iraqi hospitals.

After a week of news of Iraqis strenuously resisting U.S. efforts to liberate them, the American campaign badly needed something to make war feel good again in the homeland.

The rescue of Jessica Lynch proved just the thing. The cute 19-year-old private, who had enlisted in the army so she could get a college education and become a kindergarten teacher when she grows up, instantly became the human face of the U.S. war effort.

Now playing: Saving Private Lynch
Toronto Star
April 6, 2003

“Talk about spunk!” said Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), whom military officials had briefed on the rescue. “She just persevered. It takes that and a tremendous faith that your country is going to come and get you.”

Rescued POW put up fierce fight
Washington Post
April 3, 2003

By focusing on the angel-faced, kindergarten-teacher-in-training, we easily forget Jessica is just a tiny cog in the massive U.S. war machine currently invading Iraq, with the stated goal of installing a former American general as military governor. (Not even the White House bothers any longer to pretend this war is about “disarming” Iraq — the goal that Washington put forward for months in trying to line up U.N. support.) Could imperial ambition be any plainer?

Now playing: Saving Private Lynch
Toronto Star
April 6, 2003

“They had another celebration at the courthouse, a praise service — that she was alive,” said Mrs. Johnson. “They’re very grateful to God and to America for caring so much about their little country girl.” … [Clarence Gant, friend of the Lynch family, said:] “God dispatches angels to be around people like her.” … “After we all arrive home, we’re all planning on one heck of a shindig,” Greg Lynch, Jessica’s father told the Parkersburg News. “We love her and the little brat’s caused a big stir in this county.”

West Virginians still rejoicing over the rescue of Jessica Lynch
North Florida Online
April 24, 2003

With the Jessica story front and centre, the most lethal war machine ever assembled in history could be presented as fresh-faced, innocent and eager to please. Suddenly the war campaign no longer seemed to be about dropping bombs (8,700 in 12 days) relentlessly on a city of 5 million people, or killing unarmed women and children in Baghdad markets or at army checkpoints; it was about saving sweet, young co-eds from the Iraqi hordes (or, at least, from inferior Iraqi medical treatment.)

Now playing: Saving Private Lynch
Toronto Star
April 6, 2003

“Jessi’s face shows the kind of character she has — loving, caring,” [Lynch’s cousin, Pam Nicolais] said. “People from all over the world have told me that there is something about her face, that the Lord spoke to them and that she was going to be OK.”

Community celebrates 20th birthday of Jessica Lynch
Herald-Dispatch
April 26, 2003

“She got to talk on the phone to her grandparents and some of her cousins back home,” says family spokesperson Pam Nicolais. Nicolais talked to Lynch herself last Friday night.

“She was in such a good mood,” Nicolais says. “She finally got her hair done.”

Lynch family wants to meet Iraqi who saved Jessica
Herald-Dispatch
May 1, 2003


12. And Get Me Jayson Blair for the Rewrites!

We all know now of Jayson Blair, the former New York Times reporter and world-class liar. But what is perhaps most troubling about the Blair affair was the fact, reported by the Los Angeles Times, that many of the people Blair misquoted or lied about interviewing never bothered to complain. They either thought it would do no good or, worse, considered their woeful experience with the press to be routine.

Richard Cohen
On Not Admitting Our Mistakes
Washington Post
May 23, 2003

[Jayson] Blair is the young African-American New York Times reporter whose series of remarkable scoops on a variety of high-profile stories aroused enough curiosity that the Washington Post investigated, discovering that Blair was plagiarizing or simply inventing entire stories on events as high-profile and disparate as the D.C. sniper and former POW Jessica Lynch. …

Geov Parrish
Jayson, shut up
Working for Change
May 27, 2003

Even today, Linda Davies was still clutching the note that Pfc. Jessica Lynch, her former kindergarten student, sent six weeks ago from the desert of Kuwait, set out on pastel paper in a schoolgirl’s round handwriting and marveling at how far she had come from her home in rural West Virginia.

“I can say I’ve been to places that half of Wirt County will never see,” Private Lynch, 19, wrote with the wonder and awe of a country girl who had not visited Charleston, the state capital, until she graduated from high school but had now embarked on what she plainly saw as a great adventure.

Jayson Blair
Rescue in Iraq and a ‘Big Stir’ in West Virginia
New York Times
April 3, 2003

[Jayson Blair] pretended to go where he had not gone, made up quotes, used quotes other reporters had gathered as if they were his own, submitted false expense reports and lifted whole sections of copy produced by other reporters, submitting them as his own work.

Michael Kelley
Laughing all the way to the door
GoMemphis.com
May 25, 2003

Outside the Lynch family’s tin-roofed, white wood-frame home at the end of a single-lane gravel road, Private Lynch’s father, Gregory Lynch Sr., 43, a self-employed truck driver in heavy boots and blue jeans, put it a different way.

“What she has learned growing up in the country and woods, and by what her brother put her through, that kind of prepared her for a lot,” Mr. Lynch said.

Jayson Blair
Rescue in Iraq and a ‘Big Stir’ in West Virginia
New York Times
April 3, 2003

According to the New York Observer, Blair says he “couldn’t stop laughing” when The New York Times published a correction of a scene Blair wrote for the newspaper that had Jessica Lynch’s father standing on the porch of his house looking out over nonexistent “tobacco fields and cattle pastures.”

“That’s my favorite, just because the description was so far off from the reality,” Blair was quoted. “And the way they described it in The Times story — someone read a portion of it to me — I couldn’t stop laughing.”

Michael Kelley
Laughing all the way to the door
GoMemphis.com
May 25, 2003

[Jayson Blair] seemed to take pride in how he concocted details of the Palestine, W.Va., hometown of captured soldier Jessica Lynch. He wrote that Lynch’s father stared at a tobacco field from his front porch, and that the father fought back the tears.

Never happened.

Blair never even went to the town, although the story was supposedly written from there.

He laughed about it, writer Sridhar Pappu said.

I gagged.

A father didn’t know if his daughter would live, and a writer just made up a story, and now he thinks it’s funny.

Terry Pluto
The truth about some liars
Ohio Beacon-Journal
May 24, 2003

“She kept saying that this is what New York City must be like,” said Glenda Nelson, a family friend who took Private Lynch on her first visit to Charleston for a shopping trip, just before she left for her Army post at Fort Bliss, Tex.

The two spent several hours shopping for clothes and other items Private Lynch needed, and Ms. Nelson said the young woman was much impressed by the lights and buildings in the state capital, a city of about [55,000].

“She is nothing but a wholesome West Virginia country girl,” Ms. Nelson said. “I told her that she needed to get out and see some of the world. I didn’t mean Iraq.”

Jayson Blair
Rescue in Iraq and a ‘Big Stir’ in West Virginia
New York Times
April 3, 2003

[A] BBC (not American) investigation this month revealed that the entire Jessica Lynch story, from beginning to end, was an elaborately planned hoax perpetrated by the Pentagon and the Bush Administration. The pinnacle was a Hollywood-worthy spectacle of Lynch’s Special Forces “rescuers” charging into her Iraqi hospital, shooting blanks and shouting as though an enemy were returning fire. There was no enemy — only Pentagon cameras, which captured and carefully edited the footage to create a heroic and entirely fictitious “rescue” story that dominated American newscasts and headlines for days. That bit of fiction makes anything [discredited New York Times reporter Jayson] Blair did look even more like child’s play.

Lynch, ironically, was one of the assignments Blair faked — describing (from photographs) a trip to her West Virginia home when he never left the city.

Geov Parrish
Jayson, shut up
Working for Change
May 27, 2003

This afternoon, Mr. Nelson said the ordeal just re-emphasized the power of community, prayer and what a special woman Private Lynch is. “She was smart and gentle, a good country girl,” he said. “I think the reason she survived through this is that she is a true angel and God knows that he wants her with us for some more time.”

“I hope to God that the whole country does not forget about what a special hero we have in Jessi Lynch,” Mr. Nelson added, making clear that he had in mind some antiwar protesters who he believes have been too hard on the soldiers fighting in Iraq.

Jayson Blair
Rescue in Iraq and a ‘Big Stir’ in West Virginia
New York Times
April 3, 2003

Hotels in the vicinity of Palestine, W.Va., had no record of [New York Times reporter Jayson Blair]. His co-writer, as well as a photographer who was stationed at the Lynch home for The Times, said they did not see Mr. Blair. Mr. Blair gave his editors and his co-writer a number where he could be reached on April 2, the day the article was written. The number belonged to Glenda and Donald Nelson, friends of the Lynch family; the Nelsons said that they never met or spoke to Mr. Blair. The Nelsons live in Marmet, W.Va., about a two-hour drive from Palestine.

CORRECTION: Rescue in Iraq and a ‘Big Stir’ in West Virginia
New York Times
May 11, 2003

At Wirt County High School this morning, in Elizabeth, the county seat, the 300 students gathered in a packed auditorium to sing songs like “God Bless America” in honor not just of Private Lynch but also of other soldiers, some of them the brothers and cousins of students. …

[Rodney Watson, the high school softball coach] remembers Private Lynch as the feisty right fielder who played for four years on his team. “Being scrappy probably helped her get through this thing,” Mr. Watson said.

Jayson Blair
Rescue in Iraq and a ‘Big Stir’ in West Virginia
New York Times
April 3, 2003

Journalism is alchemy with words. We turn nuances, lies, denials, spin and unreturned phone calls into something called The Truth. Often we succeed. When we don’t, we don’t want anyone to notice. We would like to appear omniscient. Who will read us if we are constantly expressing doubt?

But the public is on to us.

Richard Cohen
On Not Admitting Our Mistakes
Washington Post
May 23, 2003


13. Lights… Camera…!

Mitchell Catlin: “Private Ryan will be treated in Germany after being in the hands of the Iraqi regime for ten days.”

John Kampfner: “Did he say Private Ryan?”

War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003

Dr. Mudhafer Raazk, 27, observed dryly that two cameramen and a still photographer, also in uniform, accompanied the U.S. teams into the hospital. Maybe this was a movie after all.

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

When footage of the rescue was released, General Vincent Brooks, US spokesman in Doha, said: “Some brave souls put their lives on the line to make this happen, loyal to a creed that they know that they’ll never leave a fallen comrade.”

The American strategy was to ensure the right television footage by using embedded reporters and images from their own cameras, editing the film themselves.

Saving Private Lynch story ‘flawed’
BBC News
May 15, 2003

We asked the Pentagon to release the full videotape of the rescue rather than its five-minute edited version to clear up any discrepancies. It declined.

John Kampfner
War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003

[A]ll of this could be completely put to rest if the army simply released the raw tape of the entire rescue, not just the highly edited 5-minute version that was given to the press. But they won’t.

It’s unlikely to the point of absurdity that releasing the raw tape would divulge any important secrets of operational security, so the only plausible reason for witholding it is that it would embarrass them. Bottom line: the army can put this issue to rest any time they want, so they should stop complaining about the BBC’s coverage until they do. What are they afraid of?

Kevin Drum
Calpundit
May 20, 2003

The Pentagon had been influenced by Hollywood producers of reality TV and action movies, notably the man behind Black Hawk Down, Jerry Bruckheimer.

Bruckheimer advised the Pentagon on the primetime television series “Profiles from the Front Line”, that followed US forces in Afghanistan in 2001. That approached was taken on and developed on the field of battle in Iraq.

Saving Private Lynch story ‘flawed’
BBC News
May 15, 2003

Hollywood and the Pentagon working in perfect symmetry. In 2001 the man behind ‘Black Hawk Down’, Jerry Bruckheimer, visited the Pentagon to pitch an idea with his co-producer. … ‘Profiles from the Frontline’ was aired in the US on the eve of war in Iraq. Its popularity with viewers suggested to the Pentagon that a similar approach would go down well once the real fighting began, as long as the embedded reporters played their part.

John Kampfner
War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003

“This story” is the dramatic rescue by commandos of Private Jessica Lynch from an Iraqi hospital, this week. … That she is a blonde, attractive 19-year-old from a tiny hill town in West Virginia only enhances the story. …

[Independent television producer] Larry Sanitsky believes that the Jessica Lynch story is worth about $US300,000 ($500,000) to $US400,000. …

Jessica Lynch had been a very dedicated soldier, Mr Sanitsky said. “Ultimately, when this experience is over, and if there is an economic benefit to her, I don’t see that as problematic.” …

But if a network was wavering, there might be one other factor that could see Jessica Lynch’s rescue transformed into entertainment. “If someone that they normally couldn’t get wanted to do it, like Jennifer Aniston,” Mr Sanitsky suggested, “that would make it different.”

Jessica’s homecoming present: TV networks call
Sydney Morning Herald
April 5, 2003

The dramatic rescue of former POW Jessica Lynch played like something out of a movie — and soon it will be just that, reports Variety. NBC is fast-tracking development on a two-hour telepic detailing Lynch’s jaw-dropping ordeal and the preparations that went into planning her rescue. The network has met with writers and is expected to choose a producer within a few days. No timetable is in place yet, but the goal is to get the movie on the air during the early part of the 2003-04 season.

NBC Making Rescue of POW Jessica Lynch Film
Coming Soon!
April 10, 2003

The footage from the raid, shot not by journalists but by soldiers with night-vision cameras, was fed in real time to the central command in Qatar. The video was artfully edited by the Pentagon and released as proof that a battle to free Lynch had occurred when it had not.

This fabrication has already been celebrated by an A&E special and will soon be an NBC movie.

Robert Scheer
Saving Private Lynch, Take Two
Los Angeles Times
May 23, 2003

So who is a hero? During the attack on Iraq, some of [Rachel] Corrie’s friends emailed her picture to MSNBC asking that it be included on the station’s “wall of heroes,” along with Jessica Lynch. The network didn’t comply, but Corrie is being honored in other ways. Her family has received more than 10,000 letters of support, communities across the country have organized memorial services and children from the occupied territories are being named Rachel. It’s not a made-for-TV kind of tribute, but maybe that’s for the best.

Naomi Klein
Rescuing Private Lynch, Forgetting Rachel Corrie
The Guardian
May 27, 2003


14. Just Rewards?

More than a week after Private Jessica Lynch was rescued in Iraq, money, college scholarships and gifts continue to pour in.

Everything from trips to Hawaii and Hungary, flowers, new cars and money have been offered to the 19-year-old Army supply clerk.

The state has even agreed to foot the bill for a party when she returns home to Palestine, West Virginia. …

Wirt County Assessor Debbie Hennen has coordinated several fund-raisers for Lynch and her family since March 23, when news came that her 507th Maintenance Company had been attacked in southern Iraq.

Hennen established a bank account, which now contains more than $4000.

Various fund-raising events, from car washes to pig roasts, have raised another $4900 and a local Wal-Mart has pledged $1000.

Gifts for Jessica Lynch
WTAP News

Aides to West Virginia’s governor, Bob Wise, a Democrat whose office sent an official to assist the Lynch family the day she disappeared in Iraq, said he was considering issuing a proclamation declaring a “Jessica Lynch Day.” The aides said dozens of calls of congratulations from other states have come in for the Lynch family and for West Virginians.

“I really do consider this a miracle in the mountains,” Governor Wise said.

Jayson Blair
Rescue in Iraq and a ‘Big Stir’ in West Virginia
New York Times
April 3, 2003

[Gov. Bob Wise] offered her a full scholarship to any college in the state system…

Jessica’s Liberation
Newsweek
April 14, 2003

The joy of her rescue still lingers in the area. Lynch’s home county, as well as her home state, are planning large celebrations in her honor when she arrives home from her stay at a Washington. D.C. area Army Hospital, where she is recovering from her extensive injuries. … The state of West Virginia is sponsoring a “statewide party” May 31 in Lynch’s honor. According to the local residents, the media hasn’t seen anything yet as far as a celebration goes — just wait until Lynch returns home.

West Virginians still rejoicing over the rescue of Jessica Lynch
North Florida Online
April 24, 2003

You think you’re busy?

You should work at the post office in Palestine, W.Va., where birthday and get-well greetings are pouring in for Army Pfc. Jessica Lynch.

“We’re getting 2 to 4 more feet of mail a day and 30 to 50 packages a day,” substitute Postmaster Sarah Johnson said Friday.

Before Johnson could finish saying how busy she was, Bob Phillips, an elementary science teacher and United Methodist minister from Beallsville, Ohio, came in and wanted to know Lynch’s address so he could send the 80 or so get-well cards his fifth- and sixth-graders have signed.

“General delivery will be fine,” Johnson answered.

Lynch doesn’t need a route number and box number anymore. …

The Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus honored Lynch and the other deployed troops in Charleston Friday night. … Miriah Duckworth has written “Jessi’s Song” about her friend and recorded it Thursday at Sweetsong Studios near Parkersburg. … Charleston attorney Shawn Bayliss has organized the Operation United Homefront Freedom Ride and Rally to honor Lynch and the troops. … Pam Nicolais, a cousin to Lynch, will receive a gift package for Lynch this afternoon from the Weirton-Wellsburg chapter of the West Virginia Credit Union League — $1,000 in cash, a $500 gift card from Kaufmann’s Department Store, a $100 gift card from Sears Roebuck & Co. and a gift basket from J.C. Penney Co. Inc. … Jerry Parkins, director of the sales department of the Charleston Marriott Town Center, is offering a free two-night stay for Lynch and her family “whenever she wants to use it.” …

Community celebrates 20th birthday of Jessica Lynch
Herald-Dispatch
April 26, 2003

Former POW Jessica Lynch is coming to Hawaii.

After she’s fully recovered, Lynch will be on Maui for a free vacation. And now, state officials are offering free trips to the other POWs.

Lynch said that when she feels better, she’s accepting the invitation extended by the Maui News to visit the Valley Isle. Tuesday, that invitation was expanded to POW Shoshana Johnson and six other American soldiers captured and released during the Iraq War.

The Maui News got involved when Jessica Lynch’s West Virginia hometown paper mentioned Lynch’s desire to visit Maui. Now, many Hawaii businesses want to help.

“The businesses in Hawaii have basically come out of the woodwork in support of this,” said Marsha Wienert, director of the Maui Visitors Bureau.

Gov. Linda Lingle said the visits by the POWs will be tremendous publicity for Hawaii.

Jessica Lynch Coming To Hawaii: Former POW Accepts Invitation For Free Maui Vacation
TheHawaiiChannel.com
April 29, 2003

On April 13, two fully equipped Ervin Cable Construction crews rolled out of Sturgis and headed for West Virginia. The local company assisted Charter Communications by donating labor to construct a 24-mile fiber optic cable extension to former POW Pfc. Jessica Lynch’s home outside of Palestine, W.Va. Some of the construction took place in the rugged hills common to West Virginia — accessible only by ATV. Construction on the cable line was completed within a week.

Local company build connection to Pfc. Jessica Lynch’s home
Union County (Kentucky) Advocate
April 30, 2003

As for Private Lynch, her status as cult hero is stronger than ever. Internet auction sites list Jessica Lynch items, from an oil painting with an opening bid of $200 to a $5 “America Loves Jessica Lynch” fridge magnet.

Saving Private Lynch story ‘flawed’
BBC News
May 15, 2003


15. The Iraqi “Hero’s” Payoff

Lynch’s birthday bash in Palestine begins at the post office on W.Va. 14 at 11 a.m. when members of the Friends of Mohammed — a group founded in Malden, W.Va., to honor the Iraqi lawyer who assisted U.S. troops in locating her — will throw a public picnic featuring Middle Eastern food and dedicate an honorary garden they planted there.

Community celebrates 20th birthday of Jessica Lynch
Herald-Dispatch
April 26, 2003

U.S. troops were tipped off to Lynch’s whereabouts in a Nasiriyah hospital by an Iraqi lawyer who, at great risk, walked six miles until he found some Marines. …

Was Lynch rescue made up? 2 Illinois pols want to know
Chicago Sun-Times
May 25, 2003

[The lawyer, Mohammed Oden] Al-Rehaief was injured during several risky treks up and down a road that came to be known as “ambush alley,” in an effort to transport information on the Nasiriyah hospital were Pfc. Lynch was held to U.S. Marines stationed outside the city.

Iraqi Lawyer Who Helped Save Jessica Lynch Accepts Job in U.S.
Fox News
May 1, 2003

A source close to those who helped the 32-year-old lawyer, Mohammed Odeh Rehaief, come to this country said his injury occurred before Lynch’s rescue, when the car he was riding in was hit by U.S. or British fire. At the time, Rehaief was making a clandestine trip to speak with U.S. Special Forces troops about the captured American soldier.

Earlier reports about Rehaief’s role in rescuing Army Pfc. Lynch have said that he had to travel several miles outside the southern Iraqi town of Nasiriyah to reach a U.S. military checkpoint, at one point trekking through what U.S. Marines had nicknamed “Ambush Alley.”

Rehaief’s injury affects his sight in one eye, the source said.

Asked about the circumstances of Rehaief’s injury, spokesmen for U.S. Army public affairs and for U.S. Central Command said yesterday that they had no information about the incident.

Allied Fire Hit Lawyer Who Aided U.S. POW: Iraqi Gets Treatment; Family Has Asylum
Washington Post
May 2, 2003

According to Newsweek’s April 14 edition, which featured Lynch on the cover, the Iraqi man, who said he witnessed Lynch being slapped around, was twice sent back to the hospital on reconnaissance missions.

Was Lynch rescue made up? 2 Illinois pols want to know
Chicago Sun-Times
May 25, 2003

Remarkably, considering all the guards around the place, Mohammed managed to sneak inside her room…

Jessica’s Liberation
Newsweek
April 14, 2003

To confirm her location, officials with the Defense Intelligence Agency (search), the military counterpart of the CIA, equipped and trained an Iraqi informant with a concealed video camera. On the day of the raid, the informant walked around the hospital, videotaping entrances and a route to Lynch’s room.

Knowledgeable sources told Fox News that this specific informant was paid for his services and that he is still in Iraq. …

Al-Rehaief, whose wife worked in the hospital, told U.S. Marines he saw Lynch being slapped by a security guard there.

Iraqi Lawyer Who Helped Save Jessica Lynch Accepts Job in U.S.
Fox News
May 1, 2003

Severely injured in the attack, [Lynch] was in a nearby hospital when Rehaief saw her being slapped on the face by an Iraqi security officer.

Upset by the incident, Rehaief risked his life to contact U.S. military forces stationed outside Nasiriyah to tell them about Lynch’s location. He made several subsequent trips to provide information about the hospital’s layout to U.S. Special Forces, who rescued Lynch on April 1.

Allied Fire Hit Lawyer Who Aided U.S. POW: Iraqi Gets Treatment; Family Has Asylum
Washington Post
May 2, 2003

The staff members said that an Iraqi intelligence officer was sometimes stationed outside the door but that they tried to move the patient beds to conceal Lynch. And they dismiss as false a well-publicized story told by an Iraqi lawyer about how he had seen a dark-clad man slapping Lynch in her hospital bed.

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

Senior military officials provided only a few details about the intelligence that led to Private Lynch’s rescue, but family members said they were told that she was located because an Iraqi doctor handed a note to a Marine indicating that she was at a hospital, listed the room number and added that she was being tortured.

Jayson Blair
Rescue in Iraq and a ‘Big Stir’ in West Virginia
New York Times
April 3, 2003

Told of the allegation through an interpreter, nurse Shinah wells up with tears. Gathering herself, she responds quietly: “This is a lie. But why ask me? Why don’t you ask Jessica what kind of treatment she received?”

But that is easier said than done. At the Pentagon last week, U.S. Army spokesman Lt.-Col. Ryan Yantis said the door to Lynch remains closed as she continues her recovery at Washington’s Walter Reed Army Medical Centre.

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

“I never saw any strangers near Jessica,” said Furat Hussein, one of the nurses. “She was never mistreated.”

Sorting fact from fiction in POW’s gripping story
Chicago Tribune
May 26, 2003

The Iraqi lawyer, Mohammed Oden al-Rehaief, and his family were whisked off to the United States.

Was Lynch rescue made up? 2 Illinois pols want to know
Chicago Sun-Times
May 25, 2003

An Iraqi lawyer who helped U.S commandos locate and rescue prisoner of war Jessica Lynch has been granted asylum in the United States, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge announced Tuesday.

Ridge identified the man as Mohammed Al Rehaief and said the lawyer and his wife and 5-year-old daughter arrived in the United States earlier this month after Homeland Security granted them “humanitarian parole.” On Monday, the family was granted asylum by the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services.

With the grant of asylum, Al Rehaief and his family can remain in the United States indefinitely. In a year, he can apply for permanent residency and five years after that, he will be eligible to apply for U.S. citizenship.

Iraqi lawyer who helped rescue Jessica Lynch granted asylum
CNN
April 30, 2003

Rehaief, his wife and their 5-year-old daughter have been in the Washington area since April 10, and Rehaief has been receiving treatment at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. On Monday, they were granted political asylum. They were allowed into the country under a program called “humanitarian parole,” which expedites entry into the United States and is often used in medical emergencies.

But a spokesman for the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services said yesterday that Rehaief was approved for humanitarian parole more for his own safety than for medical reasons.

“Quite honestly, it was the fastest way to get him and his family to safety in the United States,” said spokesman Bill Strassberger.

Allied Fire Hit Lawyer Who Aided U.S. POW: Iraqi Gets Treatment; Family Has Asylum
Washington Post
May 2, 2003

The Iraqi lawyer who led U.S. forces to former POW Jessica Lynch (search) has accepted a job offer from Washington lobbying firm The Livingston Group days after the United States granted him asylum.

The company, founded by former U.S. Rep. Bob Livingston, said details on 33-year-old Mohammed Odeh al-Rehaief’s new responsibilities were still in the works.

Iraqi Lawyer Who Helped Save Jessica Lynch Accepts Job in U.S.
Fox News
May 1, 2003

[Al-Rehaief’s] credibility as a source, however, is difficult to verify because he and his family were whisked to the United States, where he was immediately granted political asylum and has refused all interview requests. His future was assured with a job with a lobbying firm run by former Republican Rep. Bob Livingston that represents the defense industry and a $500,000 book contract with HarperCollins, a company owned by Rupert Murdoch, whose Fox network did much to hype Lynch’s story, as it did the rest of the war.

Robert Scheer
Saving Private Lynch, Take Two
Los Angeles Times
May 23, 2003

And the ending to his story?

Al-Rehaief now has an office with a Washington lobbying firm, the Livingston Group, whose principal is the former powerful Republican House member Robert Livingston.

With his own book and other deals pending, al-Rehaief is not saying much.

Was Lynch rescue made up? 2 Illinois pols want to know
Chicago Sun-Times
May 25, 2003


16. Questions Left Unanswered

[T]ens of thousands of taxpayer dollars are being spent on covering up what happened to Jessica Lynch and her mates during and after their unit was ambushed and they were captured.

Pentagon covering up Jessica story
(Kankakee) Daily Journal
May 23, 2003

The Army is investigating the Iraqi ambush of a maintenance company that resulted in nine dead soldiers and six prisoners of war, including the capture of Pfc. Jessica Lynch. …

One question the team is addressing is the plight of 19-year-old Pfc. Lynch, whose capture by Iraqis and subsequent rescue by an allied special-operations team propelled her to folk-hero status across America.

The Washington Post reported that she staged a fierce fight before capture, emptying a gun and killing Iraqi attackers before being stabbed and shot herself.

But two Pentagon officials in interviews cast doubt on that report. The officials said all evidence suggests that Pfc. Lynch’s truck crashed in the chaos of the ambush in the central Iraqi town of Nasiriyah. She suffered several bone fractures and was in no position to put up a fight, the officials said.

Army to probe Lynch capture
Washington Times
May 23, 2003

The dramatic rescue of captured Pfc. Jessica Lynch from her hospital bed in Iraq by the U.S. Special Forces quickly became one of the signature episodes of the Iraq war.

Now two Illinois lawmakers and another from New York want the Defense Department to investigate whether the story that seems too good to be true really is.

Democrats Rahm Emanuel and Jan Schakowsky are disturbed by a British Broadcasting Corp. documentary called “Saving Private Jessica: Fact or Fiction?’” that claims her daring rescue was not quite what it seemed.

“We need to have an independent inquiry to look at what happened,” said Schakowsky. The Pentagon discounted the BBC report, but Schakowsky said there should be another look.

Emanuel, who represents a North Side and suburban district next to Schakowsky’s, sent a letter last week to Joseph Schmitz, the Defense Department inspector general, asking for a probe. The letter was co-signed by Rep. Louise Slaughter, a New York Democrat.

While Lynch’s rescue was “emblematic of the courage and dedication of our Armed Forces,” states the Emanuel-Slaughter letter, the BBC report raised troubling questions as to whether the rescue was “a premeditated fabrication. This story and other reports that followed have threatened to tarnish the image of this daring rescue.”

Emanuel and Slaughter state that they want an investigation into the BBC allegations to ensure that the rescuers’ “selfless act of heroism is never questioned again.”

The storm was set off by BBC reporter John Kampfner, maker of the documentary. In a BBC.com story, Kampfner wrote that the Lynch saga, as portrayed by the Pentagon, is “one of the most stunning pieces of news management ever conceived.”

Was Lynch rescue made up? 2 Illinois pols want to know
Chicago Sun-Times
May 25, 2003


17. Bitter Endings

Far from winning hearts and minds, the US operation has angered and hurt doctors who risked their lives treating both Private Lynch and Iraqi victims of the war.

So who really did save Private Jessica?
Times Online
April 16, 2003

The medical team that cared for Lynch at the hospital formerly known as Saddam Hospital is only now beginning to appreciate how grand a myth was built around the four hours the U.S. raiding party spent with them early on April Fool’s Day.

And they are disappointed.

The real ‘Saving Pte. Lynch’
Toronto Star
May 5, 2003

US soldiers videotaped the rescue, but among the many scenes not shown to the press at US Central Command in Doha was one of four doctors who were handcuffed and interrogated, along with two civilian patients, one of whom was immobile and connected to a drip. “They were doctors, with stethoscopes round their necks,” Dr Harith said.

“Even in war, a doctor should not be treated like that.” …

“There are two faces to Americans,” Dr Harith said. “One is freedom and democracy, and giving kids sweets. The other is killing and hating my people. So I am very confused. I feel sad because I will never see Jessica again, and I feel happy because she is happy and has gone back to her life. If I could speak to her I would say: ‘Congratulations!’” …

“What the Americans say is like the story of Sinbad the Sailor — it’s a myth,” said Harith al-Houssona, who saved Private Lynch’s life after she was brought to the hospital by Iraqi military intelligence.

So who really did save Private Jessica?
Times Online
April 16, 2003


18. In Perspective

It’s great that Jessica is safe. Of course, her war experience is hardly typical.

She’ll emerge not only with her body intact but also with international celebrity and, if she wants, talk show spots and modeling contracts. (One can imagine Playboy is already thinking centrefold for a special issue: PoW Girls of Iraq). Needless to say, thousands of other people — mostly on the Iraqi side — will simply end up dead.

Now playing: Saving Private Lynch
Toronto Star
April 6, 2003

Readers are split in their reaction to the account. While some express pride in the U.S. military’s effort save one of their own, others are upset that the story of one private’s rescue has received so much attentions while others are dying in combat. One Milford, N.J., couple say that “to single out one soldier as ’special’ is a disservice to those who are serving are country in often deplorable conditions. The cover article implies that the American public is only interested in the ‘feel-good’ stories with the happy ending. The more compelling story was the group of bodies that was also removed with Private Lynch, including Private [Lori] Piestawa, the first female killed in Iraq.” And a Jacksonville, N.C., man asks “Is she the only American to serve in a war? … I do agree that she is a Marine [actually, Lynch is in the Army] doing a job. I don’t agree with all the fuss.”

Online Mail Call
Newsweek
April 14, 2003

But where the manipulation of this saga really gets ugly is in the premeditated manufacture of the rescue itself, which stains those who have performed real acts of bravery, whether in war or peacetime.

Robert Scheer
Saving Private Lynch, Take Two
Los Angeles Times
May 23, 2003

A reader in Calgary, Canada, catches a whiff of conspiracy. “What a coincidence; what timing! Just as the American military is getting criticized for blowing away civilians by the carload, a cute, totally photogenic Jessica Lynch, a 19-year-old from West Virginia (Palestine, no less), gets rescued from the clutches of the evil Iraqis. Can you say publicity stunt?” He continues, “A camo-clad damsel gets rescued and all other issues (like hundreds of dead civilians or the fact that no significant weapons of mass destruction have been found) fade into the background.”

Online Mail Call
Newsweek
April 14, 2003

The story was a gift to a grateful media. There was barely a mention of Jessica’s fallen comrades whose bodies had been retrieved from shallow graves during the same mission. A bad story had become a good one.

John Kampfner
War Spin
BBC Two
May 18, 2003

The brutality of our troops in Iraq is now infamous — the making Iraqis run naked, the beating of civilians (documented by independent reporters and Al Jazeera) and the killing of people who do not respond immediately to English orders to “stop” or “lay down your arms”; once again, it may be a language barrier or it may be a new policy of brutality our men are using.

In all these cases, and in the case of Private Jessica Lynch, none of these soldiers returning are allowed to talk with the media. After Senator Byrd returned from having talked with Ms. Lynch, he seemed even more firm in his resolve to condemn the attack in Iraq and condemned Bush even further. I’m sure, from what I heard in scuttlebutt on the hill that he may have heard the truth from Ms. Lynch, not the dispelled myths that the Bush team keeps trying to spin out for the public about her “heroic” fight and her “valiant” rescue!

Sam Hamod
When Trained Killers Come Home
CounterPunch
May 26, 2003

It turns out that the lives of some US citizens — even beautiful, young, white women — are valued more than others. And nothing demonstrates this more starkly than the opposing responses to Rachel Corrie [crushed by an Israeli bulldozer in Gaza seven days before Lynch was taken into Iraqi custody on March 23] and Pte Jessica Lynch.

When the Pentagon announced Lynch’s successful rescue, she became a hero, complete with “America loves Jessica” fridge magnets, stickers, T-shirts, mugs, country songs and an NBC made-for-TV movie. According to former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, President George Bush was “full of joy for Jessica Lynch.” Her rescue, we were told, was a testament to a core American value: as West Virginia senator Jay Rockefeller said to the Senate: “We take care of our people.”

Do they? Rachel Corrie’s death, which made the papers for two days and then virtually disappeared, has met with almost total official silence, despite the fact that eyewitnesses claim it was a deliberate act. President Bush has said nothing about a US citizen killed by a US-made bulldozer bought with US tax dollars. A US congressional resolution demanding an independent inquiry has been buried in committee, leaving the Israeli military’s investigation — which cleared itself of any wrongdoing — as the only official investigation.

Naomi Klein
Rescuing Private Lynch, Forgetting Rachel Corrie
The Guardian
May 27, 2003

[T]he revelation that thousands of media reports regarding [Lynch’s] entire Iraqi experience were utter fantasy is only the latest instance in an endless string of uncovered Bush Administration lies or hoaxes — faithfully and unquestioningly parroted by newsrooms from coast to coast which made little attempt to provide context, let alone accuracy.

Government officials often rely on one of the same favorite devices as [discredited New York Times reporter Jayson] Blair — the “unnamed” or “official” source. How many times, before and during the invasion of Iraq, did the New York Times run a front page story, leaked from the White House, that bore no relationship at all to reality? How many times did some embedded American network or newspaper reporter get a breathless scoop of the discovery of Iraq’s fabled weapons of mass destruction? How many other big, iconic stories, like Lynch’s rescue or the toppling of Saddam’s statue in Baghdad, will yet turn out to have been staged for a gullible public?

Should they ever choose to come clean, the perpetrators of those fantasies might have something interesting to tell us. Jayson Blair doesn’t.

Geov Parrish
Jayson, shut up
Working for Change
May 27, 2003

It was all a PR stunt, which American military types would have no trouble justifying: keeping the country’s war-lust up is more important than providing the stupid, annoying, persnickety truth.

The [BBC] documentary demonstrates how shockingly easy it is to parade this kind of propaganda as “fact”: take a self-congratulatory media and add the memory of the frightening ease with which Bush ignored world opinion and started a war. It’s all bad.

Eye takes look at war spin
Halifax Daily News
May 25, 2003

The Lynch rescue story — a made-for-TV bit of official propaganda — will probably survive as the war’s most heroic moment, despite proving as fictitious as the stated rationales for the invasion itself.

If the movies, books and other renditions of “saving Private Lynch” were to be honestly presented, it would expose this caper as merely one in a series of egregious lies marketed to us by the Bush administration.

Robert Scheer
Saving Private Lynch, Take Two
Los Angeles Times
May 23, 2003


19. Rare Moments of Media Self-Reflection

Sadly, almost nothing fed to reporters about either Lynch’s original capture by Iraqi forces or her “rescue” by U.S. forces turns out to be true. Consider the April 3 Washington Post story on her capture headlined “She Was Fighting to the Death,” which reported, based on unnamed sources, that Lynch “continued firing at the Iraqis even after she sustained multiple gunshot wounds,” adding that she was also stabbed when Iraqi forces closed in.

Robert Scheer
Saving Private Lynch, Take Two
Los Angeles Times
May 23, 2003

Several… readers believe that The [Washington] Post “has some problems of its own with the veracity of its reporting,” as one put it. He was referring to the paper’s exclusive April 3 front-page account of how Army Pfc. Jessica Lynch, according to “U.S. officials,” fought during an Iraqi ambush, continued firing after sustaining multiple gunshot wounds and being stabbed, and shot several Iraqi soldiers before running out of ammunition. This account, which has remained exclusive to The Post, is by far the story that readers continue to question most. I wrote a column about this on April 20, but the questioning, which has nothing to do with Pfc. Lynch but everything to do with anonymous news sources, continues. In fact, it is increasing as journalism is put in the spotlight. If there is a different version, or a confirming version, of this that is authoritative, I hope somebody will write it, along with a more probing account of her rescue.

Michael Getler
According to Someone
Washington Post
May 25, 2003

Pfc. Jessica Lynch’s capture and rescue was certainly a dramatic affair — particularly in The Post. This newspaper told its readers that she had been shot and stabbed, that she had fought off her Iraqi attackers — her gun blazing — until she went down and was taken prisoner, hospitalized and then rescued eight days later. Trouble is, much of that may be false.

Lynch apparently was not shot. Lynch was not stabbed. Lynch may not have put up much of a fight, maybe none at all. The lights may have gone out for her the moment her unit was attacked and her vehicle went off the road. It was then, probably, that she suffered several broken bones. This information, too, was in The Post — sort of.

Richard Cohen
On Not Admitting Our Mistakes
Washington Post
May 23, 2003


20. One Last, Odd Note

There’s something strange with the Jessica Lynch story.

She was allegedly captured on March 23rd… However her nine domain names [jessicalynch .org, .net, .com, .us, .biz, .info, .ws, .tv, .cc] were registered by businessmen on the 17th of March! That’s five business days before her capture, which caused the Dow Jones to climb over 215 points as the media played her story…

Is Jessica Lynch a fake?
American Patriot Friends Network
Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Iraq, Jessica Lynch, Media


May 26, 2003

A Shameful Memorial Day “Tribute”

President Bush to mark Memorial Day with a wreath-laying at Arlington National Cemetery, paying special tribute to troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. …

“Each Memorial Day, we pray for peace throughout the world, remembering what was gained and what was lost during times of war,” the president said in a Memorial Day proclamation.

“From the bravery of the men at Valley Forge, to the daring of Normandy, the courage of Iwo Jima and the steady resolve in Afghanistan and Iraq, our men and women in uniform have won for us every hour that we live in freedom.” …

Bush to Pay Tribute to Troops in Iraq
Optimum Online
May 26, 2003

Positively shameful. Or perhaps a better word is “shameless.”

George, what do you know about serving your country in time of war? Where were you in ‘72?



George Bush had an opportunity to be patriotic and he walked away from that patriotic duty if his comrades in arms can be believed. In any military unit each member looks out for the other in that unit, if one person walks away, the whole unit suffers.

This “desertion” can not be swept under the rug like some traffic ticket. This crime is an offense to every man and women in America and especially those that have served and those that are currently serving our nation in the Armed Forces.

And courage? What do you know of courage? You’re a Vietnam War deserter who sends our young men and women into harm’s way for the purpose of conquering a smaller, weaker country on the premise of… What is it this week, George? Is it still weapons of mass destruction? Or are we back to liberating the Iraqis again? Or shall we return to the deception of avenging the September 11th attacks by invading a country that had nothing to do with 9-11?

And bravery? This, from the Commander-in-Chief who spent September 11, 2001, puddle-jumping across the country in Air Force One while the rest of the nation wondered where you were, what you were doing, and why you didn’t provide us the anchor of sanity and reassurance we needed, when we needed it the most?

I won’t even get into your aircraft-carrier landing stunt. Or the way you plan to exploit the deaths of 3,000 Americans for the benefit of your 2004 election campaign.

My father was a veteran of World War II. He died, a proud patriot, more than a decade ago. Not a day has passed that I don’t miss him, more than words can say.

And yet — for his sake — I’m glad he’s not here this Memorial Day to witness this dishonor to him, and to all servicemen and women who have fulfilled their sworn duty — and worn their uniforms proudly, bravely, and legitimately.

George, this is one day you should have stayed in Crawford and kept a low profile.

To me, it is an affront to the Americans killed or injured in Iraq for the President to exploit the trappings of war for the momentary spectacle of a speech.

Senator Robert Byrd
May 7, 2003

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Afghanistan, George W. Bush, Iraq, Military/DADT, September 11


EU Constitution Unveiled

The proposed EU constitution, unveiled Monday and to be considered by EU leaders next month, calls for an elected president and the post of foreign minister to represent the union internationally, and a binding bill of rights.

The document, drawn up by a 105-member committee led by former French President Valery Giscard d’Estaing, calls for the European Union’s six-month rotating presidency to be replaced by an EU president, elected from the current batch of heads of state for two and a half years. He also favors creating the post of EU foreign minister to represent the bloc on the world stage.

Perhaps as important, at least to the British, was that the document does not use the term “federal” and the European Union will not be renamed “United Europe” of the “United States of Europe.” …

Giscard d’Estaing’s power-sharing proposals have gone down well with larger member states, such as Britain, France, Italy and Spain, but are fiercely opposed by smaller states, the European Commission and the European Parliament.

More popular among delegates to the Brussels-based body, which has been compared to the Constitutional Convention, which gave birth to the United States, are proposals aimed at boosting the bloc’s foreign policy powers.

In a nod to the recent splits over Iraq, the draft text unveiled Monday calls on members to “actively and unreservedly support the Union’s common foreign and security policy in a spirit of loyalty and mutual solidarity.”

It also commits the 15 members to come to each other’s defense in the event of terrorist attack.

EU constitution unveiled
UPI
May 26, 2003

Interesting. Most interesting. I wonder about the consequences the next time Junior bucks international opinion in order to wage war?

More than that, however, realize this: You are witnessing a major turning point in European history. Think about the comparison to the Constitutional Convention for a moment. Let it sink in.

And be awed. I am.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Civil Rights, Europe, United Kingdom & N.I.


Michael Moore Site Update

UPDATE (3:59 a.m. EDT): Looks like Mike’s ISP caught the hack, and has erected a “placeholder” page, presumably until Mike (or whoever runs his site) can reconstruct the front page. Well, at least I was able to grab the hacked message while it was still up (that’s the reward for having a couple dozen news feeds running simultaneously on your desktop!) — but eventually, one semi-”mainstream” news site (albeit the right-leaning WorldNetDaily) finally caught up with us lowly bloggers; e.g.:

The website belonging to filmmaker Michael Moore is back online after being hacked this weekend, apparently by someone hoping the director’s Academy Award gets taken away. …

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Celebrities, Crime, Homeland Insecurity, Movies


May 25, 2003

Michael Moore’s Site Hacked

MichaelMoore.com has been hacked. As of 11:48 p.m. EDT, the front page is blank, except for the following message:

Mr. Moore, your documentary “Bowling for Columbine” is fictitious, not factual. David Hardy’s Truth About Bowling is simply damning. You deliberately deceive your viewers, who are only expecting a slightly biased factual report. Mr. Moore, my personal hope is that you publicly apologize, not for your ideas, but for dubbing your lies the truth.

Please see revoketheoscar.com

Love always,
NHA Crew.

Greets to: Colin L. Powell, DoubleOh, xyral, qu3da, Rav3n, GOD, Zombie *good luck in the marines*, kluster, Ruder, OSS, YuY, Bill O’Reilly, Tyger, Avangel, sub_pop_culture, AcIdR3IgN, Renegade

What, you’re surprised? Come on, liberals, you know the score.

As is par for the course, the worst of the anti-peace brigades do their dirty work in the most anti-American of all possible ways: They attempt to suppress the constitutional right to freedom of speech of those who disagree with them.

Mr. Ashcroft, are you listening? You don’t have to agree with Mr. Moore’s views (even I don’t agree with him half the time) — but an investigation into this hack (which, if I read your USA PATRIOT correctly, constitutes an act of domestic terrorism) would be a much more efficient use of the services of the Department of Homeland Security than, say, chasing down 51 Texas legislators at the request of Mr. DeLay.

P.S. I’d start by talking to the owner of the revoketheoscar.com domain.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Celebrities, Crime, Homeland Insecurity, Movies


Dear Iraqis…

Greetings from America!

How are things? Oops, sorry — I guess that was a pretty insensitive question. Things suck, don’t they?

I hear Uncle Sam’s been fudging the number of civilians slaughtered by coalition troops — not, of course, that this comes as news to you or me; I’ve been tortured sick since Day One of Georgie Boy’s “war” by the few reports that did manage to trickle out — but I did want to let you know that at least now the truth is finally beginning to come out in American news sources:

Evidence is mounting to suggest that between 5,000 and 10,000 Iraqi civilians may have died during the recent war, according to researchers involved in independent surveys of the country. …

Such a range would make the Iraq war the deadliest campaign for noncombatants that US forces have fought since Vietnam. …

By one measure of violence against noncombatants, as compared with resistance faced by soldiers, the war in Iraq was particularly brutal. In Operation Just Cause, the 1989 US invasion of Panama, 13 Panamanian civilians died for every US military fatality. If 5,000 Iraqi civilians died in the latest war, that proportion would be 33 to 1. …

The US Department of Defense has refused to give any sort of estimate on deaths. …

Surveys pointing to high civilian death toll in Iraq
Christian Science Monitor
May 22, 2003

(Hey, now, don’t let the “Christian” in “Christian Science Monitor” turn you off — it’s a damned darned good source of information.)

I also hear that those of you left alive and in captivity by the U.S. are being treated as badly as — if not worse than — the Gitmo prisoners (if that’s even possible, in light of the news that the U.S. “has floated plans to turn Guantanamo Bay into a death camp, with its own death row and execution chamber”):

The United States is illegally holding thousands of Iraqi prisoners of war and other captives without access to human rights officials at compounds close to Baghdad airport, The Observer has learnt.

There have also been reports of a mutiny last week by prisoners at an airport compound, in protest against conditions. The uprising was ‘dealt with’ by the Americans, according to a US military source.

The International Committee of the Red Cross so far has been denied access to what the organisation believes could be as many as 3,000 prisoners held in searing heat. All other requests to inspect conditions under which prisoners are being held have been met with silence or been turned down.

There is circumstantial evidence that prisoners are being gagged and hooded, in the manner of the Afghans and other captives held at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba — treatment in itself questionable under international law. …

Red Cross denied access to PoWs
The Observer
May 25, 2003

My God, I’m sorry. I’m especially sorry there’s not a damned thing I can do about it. I’ll just keep bringing such atrocities to light here, in the hopes of awakening a few sleepyheads among the nearly 288 million Americans happily encased in their big, collective coma.

That’s all I can do.

Now, listen, Iraqis, I know the last you need is any more bad news, but frankly, I’m concerned about your health. No, no, I’m not being facetious — I mean, if you’ve read along this far, it means you’re still alive, and have at least one working eye (unless you’ve been blinded in a bomb blast, and somebody has to read this to you). In any case, aside from the possibility that you’re starving to death, missing a limb or two, and in danger of getting your ass shot off in the streets of Baghdad tonight, I’m worried about your longterm health prospects.

You see, there’s a whole lot of depleted uranium (DU) lying around your neighborhood right now. DU is, simply, “a very dense metal fashioned from low-level radioactive waste, allows [conventional munitions] to easily pierce armor and buildings that would deflect other projectiles.”

Yeah, well, the problem is, that “low-level radioactive waste” has pierced more than a few human bodies, too, and some of you folks are walking around (or lying in your hospital beds) with radioactive shrapnel in your bellies.

The really scary thing, though, is that you didn’t have to take a hit from U.S. fire to be affected by DU. The U.S. government plays down the dangers of exposure to DU, but — come on — is there a single Pentagon official who’d be willing to have the stuff lying around his backyard in order to prove there’s no risk?

Go talk to the widows of the tens of thousands of Gulf War I veterans who died after returning home from Kuwait — or talk to those who lived long enough to sire babies with “severe deformities, including missing eyes, blood infections, respiratory problems, and fused fingers.” (Just what do you think “Gulf War Syndrome” is, anyway?) Or go talk to the Afghans who show “‘astonishing’ levels of uranium in their urine.”

You can speculate all you like about what the longterm health hazards of DU exposure might be, or — like the terminally corrupt American media and the idiots who lap it up — you can swallow the official propaganda and blow off the idea that all those tons of DU we left lying around Kuwait and Iraq in ‘91 are dangerous.

So, dear Iraqis, if your local hospital hasn’t been bombed out of existence, ransacked, or filled beyond capacity already, I urge you to go get tested as soon as poss—

Wait, what am I saying? You’re just trying to stay alive at this point, aren’t you?

Damn, sorry. I forgot that for a second. That’s too easy to do in the comfort of my nice, big, American house, with a PBS special on Mexican music providing pleasant white noise in the background, as I kick back with my keyboard on my lap, and wonder idly what I’m going to make for dinner tonight.

See, Iraqis, that’s the problem with us Americans: We’re too fat and sleepy and ignorant to realize you don’t have a lot of choice in anything anymore. Betcha never thought this was what “liberation” and “democracy” were all about, didja?

I apologize. I’ll do better. I can’t promise my fellow countrymen will do better, but I’ll try. Really I will.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Afghanistan, Chemical Weapons/DU, Civil Rights, George W. Bush, Guantanamo Bay, Health & Wellness, Iraq


May 23, 2003

Political Strikes, May 23, 2003

Political Strikes, May 23, 2003

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Christianity, George W. Bush, Humor, Islam, Radical Religious Right


May 17, 2003

Your Required Weekend Reading

If you don’t have an account with the online version of The New York Times, you should; fickle left-right pendulum swings (it’s never “neutral”) and Jayson Blair aside, its op/ed pages are nearly unbeatable. (I said “nearly”; the NYT is still consistently too far to the right for my liking.)

And it’s worth registering (for free, mind you) just to read the piece below in its entirety:

Is President Bush a religious zealot, or does he just pander to that crowd? …

[Mr. Bush’s public piety] contributes to an image of crusading arrogance abroad, and to a fear of invasive moralism at home. Most recently, the president’s reluctance to offend Senator Rick Santorum — a Catholic theocrat who believes that states should have the power to arrest gay lovers in their bedrooms, or even to criminalize couples who use contraceptives — was an occasion to wonder what, exactly, Mr. Bush was born-again into. …

I’ve long suspected the essential fact about Mr. Bush is that God was his 12-step program. … This kind of born-again epiphany is common in much of America — the red-state version of psychotherapy — and it creates the kind of faith that is not beset by doubt because the believer knows his life got better in the bargain. …

It is probably not entirely irrelevant to our international relations that Tony Blair is, as one British columnist put it, “the most overtly pious leader since Gladstone,” while Jacques Chirac of France and Gerhard Schröder of Germany are adamantly secular. Mr. Schröder was the first German chancellor to refuse to end his oath of office with the customary “so help me God.” …

So God is a kind of fraternity handshake. … Mr. Bush’s frequent invocation of the Almighty in his speeches grates on the ears of worldly Europeans, who, when the president says, “God bless America,” imagine they hear, “And to hell with everybody else.” But it is a tradition of long standing in America, where our dissident origins, First Amendment protections and entrepreneurial spirit have created the most diversely religious population in the world. Mr. Bush comes nowhere near the profuse sectarian language of, say, Lincoln or the Roosevelts. He is also the first president to expand the routine homage to “churches and synagogues” to include “mosques.” That amendment came long before 9/11, and was welcome, even if it was motivated by the awareness that American Muslim voters constitute a growing, unexploited voter pool. …

His advocacy of faith-based social programs, for example, clearly grows from his conviction, based on personal experience, that religion can bring an extra charisma to problems like drug abuse. If that also happens to win him religious votes and to coincide with the Republican aversion to government social programs, so much the better for Mr. Bush. …

Perhaps the most important effect of Mr. Bush’s religion is that, for better or for worse, it imparts a profound self-confidence once he has decided on a course of action. This has been most conspicuous since Sept. 11 in the way he has talked about his mission to make the world safe for democracy. Some listeners take it as presumptuous, messianic, even blasphemous. …

As for the enduring notion that Mr. Bush takes his instructions from the organized Christian right, it misses a much more interesting story: as an independent political structure, the Christian right is dying.

For one thing, the organizations that hit their stride in the 1980’s have waned. The Moral Majority is long gone. The Christian Coalition is withering. Bombastic evangelical power brokers like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson have aged into irrelevance, and now exist mainly as ludicrous foils. …

At the same time… many local activists have gravitated into the Republican Party as county chairmen and campaign consultants. Once an independent force hammering at the president and Congress, they are now an institutional part of the party base. They must be kept mollified — but in balance with other parts of the coalition, like business, and within the bounds of what a majority of voters will accept. Karl Rove, the White House political genius, has a master plan for enlarging that ecumenical array of believers — churchgoing Catholics, Mormons and Jews as well as the evangelicals — and welding them permanently into the Republican mainstream.

The interesting story, then, is not that Mr. Bush is a captive of the religious right, but that his people are striving to make the religious right a captive of the Republican Party.

Bill Keller
God and George W. Bush
New York Times
May 17, 2003

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Catholicism, Christianity, Civil Rights, Europe, Free Speech, George W. Bush, Homophobia, Islam, Judaism, Karl Rove, LDS/Mormons, Privacy, Radical Religious Right, Religion & Spirituality, Republicans, Rick Santorum, September 11


Another 242 Iraqis Liberated!

This should warm the hearts of the pro-war brigades (sorry I couldn’t find any pictures for the truly bloodthirsty — or for those who like their real-life gore in living color):

Statistics unpublished until today reveal the stark facts: 242 people have died in Baghdad in just over three weeks, almost all from bullet wounds. It is an epidemic, and it is getting worse.

But the late-night scenes in a city hospital tell the real story of the postwar price that the Iraqi capital is paying for the occupying forces’ failure to live up to their responsibility to make the streets safe.

At 3.20am yesterday, Haider Khassem’s friends stuffed him half-dead into the back seat of a car. Doctors at al-Kindi hospital’s casualty department had done all they could to treat the four bullet wounds in his chest with which he had been brought to them 90 minutes earlier, a hefty young man thrashing in agony and spouting blood like a clubbed seal. They concluded he needed urgent treatment by specialists at a cardiothoracic hospital 20 minutes away. The driver of al-Kindi’s only remaining ambulance — the other three have been stolen or looted — had disappeared. So the dangerously ill Mr Khassem was bundled into a clapped-out, rust-bitten orange Moskavich 408. A friend held his intravenous drip out of the back window. In the front seat sat Salah Fayek, his head wrapped in a turban of bandages to staunch an injury inflicted in the same attack.

Thus, the maimed and wounded set off into the benighted streets of Baghdad, a city under curfew and echoing with sporadic gunfire, to try to save a life. …

Dr Fa’ak Amin Bakr, director of the city mortuary, says 242 people have died in the past 25 days, of whom more than nine out of 10 had been shot. He says that before the invasion Baghdad had an average of one death a day caused by gunshot wounds.

Battles between looters and score-settling from the Saddam years have taken hold, fuelled by a security vacuum that owes much to a decision by Donald Rumsfeld, the American Defence Secretary, to invade and occupy Iraq with minimum troop numbers — two divisions short, say well-informed sources within the Allies’ reconstruction team.

They are the by-product, too, of the failure of the Allies to coax the Baghdad police to return to work in sufficient numbers. Most of the Iraqi officers who have returned have yet to come out of their police stations.

And homicide figures are going up. The 124 who died from bullet wounds in the past 10 days is a rise of 60 per cent on the previous 10-day period. …

This is the mess that Washington has deployed Paul “Jerry” Bremer, a protégé of Henry Kissinger, to sort out. Unlike Jay Garner, the man he replaces as Iraq’s chief administrator, he has been assigned full authority over the Allied administration in Iraq.

At his first press conference in Baghdad yesterday, Mr Bremer… [said the] “serious law and order problem” in the capital was a top priority… He noted that 100,000 inmates were released from Iraqi prisons in October by Saddam Hussein. “It’s time those people are put back in jail,” he said.

This peculiar endorsement of Saddam’s judicial system will not endear Mr Bremer to human and civil rights activists. Less likely to object are the desperate doctors of Baghdad who want something to be done before hundreds more end up in the mortuary.

Baghdad pays the postwar price: 242 die in three weeks
The Independent
May 16, 2003

Gee, I hope this story was enough to make the anti-peace bunch happy. I sure will try to do better next time, and find you some nice, big pictures of this Crusade of Carnage you support.

Sleep well tonight.

Posted by: Sapphocrat

 |  |

Tweet This Tweet This Post! Tweet This


Filed Under: Iraq


 

 
The newest and sexiest books are just a click away.
 

Latest Comments to
The Lavender Newswire
and
The Gaytheist Agenda


 

 

 

Bad Behavior has blocked 1149 access attempts in the last 7 days.